The only reason it should ever be done is for medical purposes, otherwise, no matter what anyone says it IS genital mutilation by very definition. You're cutting off a piece of skin which is there to protect the head of the penis.
I'm uncut, so yes I will probably be a bit bias, and anyone who is an adult and and wants it removed should be able to as they wish (I've considered it) but doing it to children is wrong.
Even though most of the "Medical benefits" are false, and have been proven false. Lets just consider they're true. You don't have a surgery as a child, to get your appendix removed, even though it 'Might' have medical benefits do you? And risk aside, this is no different. As for personal opinion on what it looks/feels like, well a parent wouldn't make an infant get a tattoo even if they thought it looked nice, so why is this any different to that either? There's no excuse for it, not even religious (Y'know, since people don't always follow a parents religion, like OP) it's barbaric to do that kind of thing to a child.
I'm uncut, so yes I will probably be a bit bias, and anyone who is an adult and and wants it removed should be able to as they wish (I've considered it) but doing it to children is wrong.
Even though most of the "Medical benefits" are false, and have been proven false. Lets just consider they're true. You don't have a surgery as a child, to get your appendix removed, even though it 'Might' have medical benefits do you? And risk aside, this is no different. As for personal opinion on what it looks/feels like, well a parent wouldn't make an infant get a tattoo even if they thought it looked nice, so why is this any different to that either? There's no excuse for it, not even religious (Y'know, since people don't always follow a parents religion, like OP) it's barbaric to do that kind of thing to a child.