Question for the Transgenders here.

Recommended Videos

Dizchu

...brutal
Sep 23, 2014
1,277
0
0
McElroy said:
But in my country we don't call anyone 'people'. And the pronoun I use for this table is the same I use to refer to my grandma and the dog and everything else. I'm not even kidding. We have the ultimate liberty - linguistic liberty! Anyway, they just worked gender identity stuff into the school curriculum a few years ago. Imagine if due to some global sensibility they'd have to add a footnote "remember kids, don't call them transgenders", and soon everyone's back to using the local word for 'tranny'. But this is a small country, anything could happen.
That's a completely different argument though, we're talking about the English language. In Spanish "negro" means "black", as in the colour. In English it's considered an offensive term to refer to black people.

Annie said:
Shhh... the Americans, Canadians, the Brits, and the Aussies are pretending to be the center of the world again.
Would you go to a Japanese messageboard and complain that they think Japan is the "center of the world"?
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,759
0
0
The_State said:
The thing about your question is that you're operating on a generalization, you even use the term "generally" in your initial asking.
Sounds to me like he was looking for a broader understanding by opening up the question to a board he knows has a large trans population.

TheLaughingMagician said:
So yeah, etymologically "transgenders" might not seem offensive but how it's been used has affected it, just like cromulent wasn't a word until a very clever comedy writer got a voice actor to say it and we all collectively went "yep that's a word now." Even if it doesn't appear in the dictionary.
Except I'm not arguing that etymologically, it's not offensive. I was actually arguing that culturally, your own examples are perfect examples of cultural issues with words that you used as alternatives to the culturally offensive ones. That "gay people" is used contextually, culturally, like "gays" and "the gays." That transgender itself is used as a sneer word.

My subpoint would relate to your telling of the word queer:

Like @SomethingAmyss said, queer is a good example. Most of my gay friends identify as queer, but one guy in particular actually finds ****** less offensive than queer because even without hate behind the word queer in it's most traditional use means weird so it's a label he resents.
I'd make a tangential note that I have no problem identifying as weird. My username is Something Amyss not just because I could cram the name "Amy" into it in a name-based pun, but also because I embrace my inner freak. I myself am strange and unusual. I'm a freak, on or off a leash. However, this is more of an aside. People don't like being called queer for that reason? Fine. Long as they don't tell me how I can use language to describe myself.

When I brought up queer earlier in the thread, it was in the context of an argument over whether it could be used at all. Not whether you should call person X queer, or whether it's a term straight people should use on gays, but on whether or not it should be acceptable to use at all. I can no longer, according to a good chunk of both the gay and trans community, call myself queer. Or, more accurately, cannot call myself queer without social repercussions of my self-identification.

I'm in my thirties now, and have watched the language surrounding the trans community evolve. That's fine. I've watched a broader, more blanket understanding of trans individuals evolve. That's beyond fine. It's freaking awesome. When I was growing up, the notion that you could be trans and not want a "sex change," if you'll pardon the term, was almost completely alien. You were "pre-op" or "post-op." So changing that is great. Hell, in the last 6 years, my partner has discovered nonbinary identity and now finally feels there is a category that actually describes them. And that's awesome.

The problem I have, then, is the way some words are actually being policed. "transsexual" is often deemed unacceptable, even if the person feels the label fits them. People who have called themselves genderqueer are under fire because of the notion that "queer" is now an unacceptable word (which i why I chose that specific word, because it impacts both LGB and T individuals). I usually say "trans" or "transfolk" to jump around the issue, but...I know that at some point in the future, assuming someone doesn't murder me for being "queer," those will come under fire, too. Basically, as a term catches on in the mainstream, it will become a slur in some fashion. We're seeing this with transgender already. Worse, because "transgender" is already a clumsy word when used in a descriptive fashion. Kyuubi indicated the best case scenario for "transgenders" was that it was used by people who are totally ignorant to trans people, but I doubt that applies to HappyNinja. In my experience, it's often used by people who don't know how to conjugate "transgender."

Hell, Saelune has used "transgendered" before, and a lot of transfolk don't like that. I'm not saying she's wrong to say it, but I've been yelled at for defending the use of the word by other trans people.

Having been policed before, both on my identity and how I choose to express it, by people in this very thread no less, I think this is a germane issue.

But more specifically, there's an issue here with the notion that "gay people" is somehow socially not going to carry the same baggage as "gays" or "the gays." Especially since the former is still used by gays. I don't know anyone who calls themselves "the gays," but I can point you to a ton of gays, lesbians, and bisexuals who will call themselves "gays," "lesbians" or "bisexuals." Or, I could, if they wanted anything to do with a gaming site. For some reason, there's kind of a stigma about video games and homo/transphobia.

I don't personally know any trans person who uses "transgenders," but I do know plenty of people who have been policed for their "problematic" self-identity. Myself included.

As I said before, this is what a "Social Justice Warrior" ostensibly is: someone who is so progressive they will erase me.

Now, it occurs to me, I don't know anything about you really. Just that I like your Andy Kaufman avatar and a lot of your posts. But I don't know if/what minority groups you might belong to. Could be none. But if you might try, imagine any group you are a part of actively precluding you in the name of progress. I don't know, hopefully I get my point across. My track record is kind of poor, and the answers I've gotten on here effectively boil down to "I don't like being discriminated against or erased from our culture, but it's okay if I do it to others." Do unto others that which you would not want done to you.

Some days, I find the trans community so toxic I really wish I could get out. No, obviously #notalltranspeople, but still.
 

DudeistBelieve

TellEmSteveDave.com
Sep 9, 2010
4,771
1
0
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
First off, the term "transgenders" has become derogatory... At best it's used by people who are totally ignorant to trans people, the kind of people who generally don't even understand that trans men exist... Though mostly it's like "the gays" anymore, it's used generally as a dismissive, or fear inducing generalization...
Serious, when did this change happened?

Cause I've been saying that for quite a while now ever since I got corrected.

Good looking out, I learned something. Our language is evolving way to fast.
 

KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime

Lolita Style, The Best Style!
Jan 12, 2010
2,151
0
0
DudeistBelieve said:
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
First off, the term "transgenders" has become derogatory... At best it's used by people who are totally ignorant to trans people, the kind of people who generally don't even understand that trans men exist... Though mostly it's like "the gays" anymore, it's used generally as a dismissive, or fear inducing generalization...
Serious, when did this change happened?

Cause I've been saying that for quite a while now ever since I got corrected.

Good looking out, I learned something. Our language is evolving way to fast.
The thing is "transgenders" that's with an "s" at the end is used to avoid saying "transgender people", "trans people", "transgender folk", "trans folk", "transgender community", or "trans community". As best as I can tell it originated with vocal transphobes, as I've never seen a trans person ever use the term, and most trans people are not cool with "transgenders". It's not a change, it's the fact that it's a term that wasn't used to refer to trans people until anti-transgender groups coined it.
 

DudeistBelieve

TellEmSteveDave.com
Sep 9, 2010
4,771
1
0
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
DudeistBelieve said:
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
First off, the term "transgenders" has become derogatory... At best it's used by people who are totally ignorant to trans people, the kind of people who generally don't even understand that trans men exist... Though mostly it's like "the gays" anymore, it's used generally as a dismissive, or fear inducing generalization...
Serious, when did this change happened?

Cause I've been saying that for quite a while now ever since I got corrected.

Good looking out, I learned something. Our language is evolving way to fast.
The thing is "transgenders" that's with an "s" at the end is used to avoid saying "transgender people", "trans people", "transgender folk", "trans folk", "transgender community", or "trans community". As best as I can tell it originated with vocal transphobes, as I've never seen a trans person ever use the term, and most trans people are not cool with "transgenders". It's not a change, it's the fact that it's a term that wasn't used to refer to trans people until anti-transgender groups coined it.
Huh... I've only ever used it to save on syllables or because I didn't feel like saying "trans folk" (one of my preferred go to, but occasionally I feel like it gives the tone of my text a unintentional southern twang)... Well good to know, Trans Folk it is exclusively now.
 

s0denone

Elite Member
Apr 25, 2008
1,196
0
41
The_State said:
As interesting and overwrought as the resulting conversation on this thread is, I'm going to try to address the original topic.

Trans people are often times just like regular people. Mostly because they are regular people. Their sexual taste varies completely based on the individual.

My girlfriend and I are both pre-op transwomen, and while I'm not terribly fond of her penis, she ADORES mine. Fact is I don't like most genitalia, and their existence doesn't factor in for me in terms of attraction. Whereas my ladyfriend is waaaay into transgirls and dates them almost exclusively. And I think that dichotomy kind of highlights a basic conceptual flaw in your query.

The thing about your question is that you're operating on a generalization, you even use the term "generally" in your initial asking. But we, as trans people, only have that one thing in common. Sure some of our experiences in that specific regard might be similar, but aside from that we're all going to be radically different people. Well, I guess it's a fair bet that we're also all into video games on this board. My point is that you're going to get a lot of different responses because the question you're asking doesn't directly correlate to the group you're asking it of.
Disregarding everything else, it seems like a like of the trans boys and girls of this forum have one major thing in common: Dating other trans.

I'd say it seems unfair to call transpeople exclusively dating transpeople fair and rational and then say a cisgendered person not wanting to date a transperson is irrational.
 

DudeistBelieve

TellEmSteveDave.com
Sep 9, 2010
4,771
1
0
MarsAtlas said:
DudeistBelieve said:
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
First off, the term "transgenders" has become derogatory... At best it's used by people who are totally ignorant to trans people, the kind of people who generally don't even understand that trans men exist... Though mostly it's like "the gays" anymore, it's used generally as a dismissive, or fear inducing generalization...
Serious, when did this change happened?

Cause I've been saying that for quite a while now ever since I got corrected.

Good looking out, I learned something. Our language is evolving way to fast.
Its not "transgender", its the "s" at the end, and really this applies to most groups. I know most of us wouldn't expect to hear anything good following somebody saying "the blacks" or "the gays", no? I certainlycringe whenever I hear a person say "they're a black" or "they're a gay" before they even get to saying anything derogatory. Even without hearing what they say first we assume the worst because there's implications to saying "the x's" like that. Its kind of sort of like that with that with this. While not necessarily intentional it is a tad bit dehumanizing to describe a lot of groups in that way because you're defining everybody in that group by that characteristic. When you say "blacks" as opposed to "black people" you're stripping away the "people" part and focusing solely on that one characteristic, even defining their existence around that trait. I personally think that more often than not that it is not deliberate (though sometimes it certainly is[footnote]As an example, "homosexuals" being deliberately used by vehement homophobes vs "gay people" being used by everybody else. Even a lot of homophobes say "gay people" but many homophobes are deliberately being dehumanizing when they say "homosexuals".[/footnote]) but intentional or not words have implications. Thats just the unfortunate reality of being a species that doesn't communicate instantaneous through psychic means. Or means that are basically being psychic, like with the Geth from Mass Effect. Now it seems to be oversensitive to get upset over it but people point it out because language does rub off on people over time. Ironically, when this is brought up a lot of people bring up Orwell, invoking Newspeak from 1984 while usually missing the point of Newspeak in the first place.

Its a bit similar with "transgendered", though that one is a bit more obvious. Does "angryed", "saded" or "happied" sound right to you? Does "muslimed" or "asianed" or "gayed" sound right to you? Besides just sounding off to most people the implication is that its a state of being that happens at some point rather than just being. For example, Langston Hughes and Nelson Mandela are black but they were never "blacked" or "blackened" but you might order a steak that was "blackened" as it was at one point not black. The implication, intentional or not, with "transgendered" is that gender dysphoria is something that is foisted upon them at some point in their life by an outside force rather than just something simply naturally occuring. Having the stupid monkey brains that we do most make the logical assumption that if we can do something we can undo it, hence stuff like transgender conversion therapy, which is literally the exact same thing as gay conversion therapy but with a few words swapped around. To further my point, if you look into gay conversion therapists and so-called "ex-gay" people you'll find that its unsuccessful and that the people are still gay, yet they say it works. Why? Because they define "gay" by actively pursuing sexual contact with somebody of the same gender. In other words, to them you aren't simply gay, but being gay is something foisted upon you by outside forces. This example is a deliberate manipulation on their part to get out of a philosophical dilemna - its to wiggle out of a very logical question, in this case "why would god make me gay?", by redefining one or more of the words used. Its logical trickery, which is the entire purpose of newspeak.
mmm... I may of very well been playing a part in that logical trickery this whole time and not been aware of it. Well fuck me, I feel kinda like dick.

Cause, ya know, sometimes I discuss topics in a very flippant matter. Like I've said "blacks" before, not intentionally stipping away the identity in subtle way but more out of... ya know, attempt to subvert the gravitas of whatever subject it was at hand. Ya know, I am a dick in that I don't like to take things seriously. I'm not a dick in the sense I want to make someone feel somehow less of a human being.

But if I've been dehumanizing people with my language and coming across like that. Well shit, I gotta re-work my phrasing and what not.
 

KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime

Lolita Style, The Best Style!
Jan 12, 2010
2,151
0
0
s0denone said:
Disregarding everything else, it seems like a like of the trans boys and girls of this forum have one major thing in common: Dating other trans.

I'd say it seems unfair to call transpeople exclusively dating transpeople fair and rational and then say a cisgendered person not wanting to date a transperson is irrational.
I think you kind of miss the point here... Nearly all trans folk I know personally, including myself, don't care if the person they're dating is cisgender, or transgender, that's not a factor for most trans people. On the other hand, just being trans is a massive deal breaker for most cisgender people. That's the difference here. Virtually all trans people are open to dating cis folk, but for most cis folk dating a trans person is out of the question to them. That's the thing, for trans people often our only option is a trans partner, because cisgender people won't date us. That's regardless of the anyone's sexuality too. It seems often that cis people are a lot more hung up on gender assigned at birth and genitals than trans people.
 

s0denone

Elite Member
Apr 25, 2008
1,196
0
41
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
I think you kind of miss the point here... Nearly all trans folk I know personally, including myself, don't care if the person they're dating is cisgender, or transgender, that's not a factor for most trans people. On the other hand, just being trans is a massive deal breaker for most cisgender people. That's the difference here. Virtually all trans people are open to dating cis folk, but for most cis folk dating a trans person is out of the question to them. That's the thing, for trans people often our only option is a trans partner, because cisgender people won't date us. That's regardless of the anyone's sexuality too. It seems often that cis people are a lot more hung up on gender assigned at birth and genitals than trans people.
I don't know if I personally would, possibly not; but I don't think it has ever been a theme.

In the end I think most examples of trans women I've seen look way too masculine to be attractive to me, and I am naturally not attracted to trans men, as I am not attracted to cisgendered men.

I don't understand why it would be hard for you to understand people being "hung up" on genitals.
I am turned on by female genitalia, but not turned on by a big ol' cock 'n' balls. The vast majority of people feel like that.

If a transman or transwoman is pre-op and ignoring literally everything else about them, it is totally fair and rational for a heterosexual to not be attracted to them.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
I've never really thought about it to be honest. I find trans* people to be good company in general. I enjoy the intimate company of others as much as the next person, but sex rarely comes into question now. Years of antipsychotics and drinking has dulled the need. The occasional fling, perhaps, but frankly I don't really consider being trans as an important quality of finding someone who I could see myself living with.

In terms of sexual attraction ... I think trans people are generally more interesting. I also find that cisgender people eroticize trans* people, so being with trans* people feels less superficial(?) ... so there's that working in their favour also. But with the clubs and scenes I attend when I decide to bother to go out drinking and dancing, the idea of hooking up with a trans* person regardless of gender identity and sexual preference isn't exactly super uncommon. BDSM places are a lot of fun for that reason. I'm 5'10'' ... so I'm tall enough. Not lanky when presenting as male, but tall presenting as female. And given years of HRT and orchiectomy ... basically shifted in that direction as primary expression because it's just easier to do so.

By dint a lot of trans women are going to be slightly taller than average, and I like roughly 5'08 - 6'+, I find height sexy ... that and because I don't want to be that sole person who has to reach up and take things from the top shelf in supermarkets. Frankly I prefer trans people because they ask less questions and it feels less like some existential checklist of 'things to do' in someone's life. But this is purely shallow attraction. When talking about mental attributes, skills, talents, knowledge, how someone lives their life? Trans or cis, doesn't really matter.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,990
118
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
FirstNameLastName said:
It kind of seems like you're calling the OP "totally ignorant" with that statement. Considering you describe your post as a gentle correction and polite I'm assuming the OP was supposed to exclude themself from the category of "people who use the word transgenders" but there wasn't really anything in your original post suggesting it didn't apply to everyone. Just saying, it seems a lot harsher than you were probably intending it to be.
Yeah I probably should have said that it tends to be used by people who are to some degree ignorant about trans issues. Then again I've only seen the word itself poping up recently, the fact that a lot of trans people are against that particular word is something I've seen even ardent and highly active allies fail to notice. Still that's beside the point, as I've pointed out myself, I often word things badly, despite trying to do the opposite.

I'd also like to point out that ignorance in and of itself also isn't a damning thing, because it can easily be rectified by learning new information.
Well, seeing as you are the first person to ever say that the word transgender is now an offensive term, and I've heard several members of that community use the term simply to describe themselves in a plural fashion, when talking about broad impacting issues, or just in general as a descriptor. I think it's more accurate to say that you specifically are offended by the term? I may only be a cis, but I have spoken to several members of your community, and I've read articles by many of them, and listened to multiple discussions of their issues on vlogs and podcasts. And not once, have any of them mentioned "by the way, we don't like the term transgender." Not once. And most of these interviews I've watched are, what some might call Trans Issues 101 discussions. Where it's a trans person explaining stuff to a cis about their issues.
 

Poetic Nova

Pulvis Et Umbra Sumus
Jan 24, 2012
1,974
0
0
Musette said:
Now, I'm not on HRT yet, but I start... well holy shit, I start tomorrow
Congratulations on starting on HRT!

Mine is still atleast a month or 2 away >.>

Honestly? For me the gender doesn't matter at all when it comes to having a partner. While I still keep looks in high regards, the personality is more important.
 

KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime

Lolita Style, The Best Style!
Jan 12, 2010
2,151
0
0
Happyninja42 said:
Well, seeing as you are the first person to ever say that the word transgender is now an offensive term, and I've heard several members of that community use the term simply to describe themselves in a plural fashion, when talking about broad impacting issues, or just in general as a descriptor. I think it's more accurate to say that you specifically are offended by the term? I may only be a cis, but I have spoken to several members of your community, and I've read articles by many of them, and listened to multiple discussions of their issues on vlogs and podcasts. And not once, have any of them mentioned "by the way, we don't like the term transgender." Not once. And most of these interviews I've watched are, what some might call Trans Issues 101 discussions. Where it's a trans person explaining stuff to a cis about their issues.
I made the relevant portion bold because it's incorrect and misleading...

Transgender is not an offensive term, but transgenders as a plural is. It's tacking on an s so you don't have to refer to transgender people as people, it's a classic dehumanization tactic that hate groups. Now I'm not saying you're a bigot or anything like that, because I've seen you post enough and I know you're not a bigot, transphobe, or anything like that. The word transgeders, that's with an 's' at the end when used as a plural, only entered the lexicon when anti-transgender forces started using for the bathroom debate, as a derogatory way way of classifying transgender people.

To be absolutely clear the word transgenders is like saying 'the gays', or 'the blacks', or similar. They're terms designed to refer to a group while avoiding referring to the group in question as people.

Sorry for the confusion on this point. It's not 'transgender' that's an offensive term, it's purely 'transgenders that's the derogatory term.
 

Addendum_Forthcoming

Queen of the Edit
Feb 4, 2009
3,647
0
0
KyuubiNoKitsune-Hime said:
I made the relevant portion bold because it's incorrect and misleading...

Transgender is not an offensive term, but transgenders as a plural is. It's tacking on an s so you don't have to refer to transgender people as people, it's a classic dehumanization tactic that hate groups. Now I'm not saying you're a bigot or anything like that, because I've seen you post enough and I know you're not a bigot, transphobe, or anything like that. The word transgeders, that's with an 's' at the end when used as a plural, only entered the lexicon when anti-transgender forces started using for the bathroom debate, as a derogatory way way of classifying transgender people.

To be absolutely clear the word transgenders is like saying 'the gays', or 'the blacks', or similar. They're terms designed to refer to a group while avoiding referring to the group in question as people.

Sorry for the confusion on this point. It's not 'transgender' that's an offensive term, it's purely 'transgenders that's the derogatory term.
My personal bugbear is -ed. As in a past tense. It sounds weird. It feels like it's something people write but wouldn't say. 'Transgendered' sounds really ... obtuse. It's like if somebody said; "Well, I thought he was straight, but over the weekend he just came out as gayed." It sounds ridiculous. Especially when you end up making it longer and ending with a harsh final syllable that ultimately makes follow up words in the same sentence more difficult to say. It takes longer and is more uncomfortable to say ... so I don't get why it's persisted. But once again, I think it's something people write but don't actually say.

As for the pluralising of a plurality ... it sounds weird. But I can sort of see how it comes up innocently enough. I mean homosexuals, lesbians, heterosexuals, etc ... I've never really come across it as an insult. At least nothing compared to a certain slur. I can see why it's problematic though as; "The gays..." as a term I have seen, usually as if a precursor to a lot of bigoted garbage.
 

Gengisgame

New member
Feb 15, 2015
276
0
0
MarsAtlas said:
Happyninja42 said:
She mentioned how she isn't attracted to transmen, and is basically only attracted to cisgender men.
Did she say that she isn't attracted to trans men or did she say that she doesn't date trans men? There's a difference. The former is just a psychological block people tend to put up, particularly regarding trans folk
A natural thing

People say they they are put off by plastic surgery and breast implants and it rarely has anything to do with the look if the job is done well enough. If they look real then to the beholder they are just as attractive as the real thing but if you find out there fake then subconsciously you realize that this persons features are not because of genetics and these won't be passed on. In the case of a trans that's a given to a larger degree.