Sorry for the vague title, but I wasn't sure exactly what to call these questions...
Question one:
Why do people feel the need to fight in order to have secure a relationship? Let me explain. Jim and Tina are dating. Bobby flirted with Tina, so now Jim must fight Bobby. On top of this first question, what makes a person think that if you can beat up someone's significant other, you can take their place? IE: If Bobby beats Jim, Tina will like Bobby more, so Bobby believes. Actually, in general, why does anyone believe that if you can beat the other person in a fight their argument is more valid?
Question two:
Why does someone feel that others in a relationship are still able to be obtained? Let's go back to Jim, Tina and Bobby. Bobby flirted with Tina, knowing full well that she is happy with Jim. Tina tells Jim of this flirting and so Jim goes to confront Bobby. Bobby is outraged that Jim would dare confront him about this.
Where is the logic here?!
Finally, if those two items are not juicy enough for discussion, are there any other strange questions you have about how relationships work that just drive you batty?
Edit: Forgot to mention, Jim and Tina are a happy couple in a fairly committed relationship. Tina does not like Jim for his fighting abilities. She's not that superficial. Not sure if these things needed to be said or not.
Second Edit!: My description of the first question is not what I meant it to be. It was "If Bobby beats Jim, Tina will like Bobby more" -- Thinks Bobby. Right, it didn't really make sense before.
Question one:
Why do people feel the need to fight in order to have secure a relationship? Let me explain. Jim and Tina are dating. Bobby flirted with Tina, so now Jim must fight Bobby. On top of this first question, what makes a person think that if you can beat up someone's significant other, you can take their place? IE: If Bobby beats Jim, Tina will like Bobby more, so Bobby believes. Actually, in general, why does anyone believe that if you can beat the other person in a fight their argument is more valid?
Question two:
Why does someone feel that others in a relationship are still able to be obtained? Let's go back to Jim, Tina and Bobby. Bobby flirted with Tina, knowing full well that she is happy with Jim. Tina tells Jim of this flirting and so Jim goes to confront Bobby. Bobby is outraged that Jim would dare confront him about this.
Where is the logic here?!
Finally, if those two items are not juicy enough for discussion, are there any other strange questions you have about how relationships work that just drive you batty?
Edit: Forgot to mention, Jim and Tina are a happy couple in a fairly committed relationship. Tina does not like Jim for his fighting abilities. She's not that superficial. Not sure if these things needed to be said or not.
Second Edit!: My description of the first question is not what I meant it to be. It was "If Bobby beats Jim, Tina will like Bobby more" -- Thinks Bobby. Right, it didn't really make sense before.