Yea, thats sort of what I had been thinking, but then I realized no one else ever lets you do that. So I understand what you are thinking, but it seems like you missed the next step.
teh_pwning_dude said:Um, if you buy a game in the shops, you'll generally have to buy it again when you switch computers.
So yeah, they're the heroes of the situation. Don't be such a dick to them.
Everyone seems to have missed my point. Yes, you have to buy it twice for PS3 because the systems that handle them are entirely different in interface and style, publishing-wise. You can't pop a blu-ray disk in a 360 and say "go".guardian001 said:Really? That was stupid of you. Most other games that are multi-platform require you to buy bother versions. Heck, most games that aren't multi-platform require you to buy multiple copies for multiple computers.Catalyst6 said:But I had kind of assumed that buying one version of something would mean that you got to play all versions.
Ah, this might explain it, actually. Man, D2D are bastards... go Steam...Void(null) said:Direct2Drive and Gamers gate force you to buy the Mac & PC versions of Games separately, even if the retail version supports both.
This is why Steam is advertising as they are, its a way to say "Look, we are better than the competition by treating our customers fairly, buy more games from us, you don't need Direct2Drive!"
While the baseline hardware arcitecture of the average modern PC and the average Mac are identical, the problem is games do not talk directly to the hardware. In fact, in both cases the design of the OS is such that even if a programmer wanted they can't write code at that level in anything approaching a convenient fashion. Instead, you have several layers of software in between your program and the hardware itself acting as an intermediary, and unfortunately for all, these are far from identical.Catalyst6 said:Everyone seems to have missed my point. Yes, you have to buy it twice for PS3 because the systems that handle them are entirely different in interface and style, publishing-wise. You can't pop a blu-ray disk in a 360 and say "go".
However, Steam has made it so that the aforementioned blu-ray *could* go into something else, while using the same "disk". Yes, PCs and Macs use different coding, but they are still bound by the same service, Steam. I was just saying that it seemed odd that they would advertise that you could play it on both systems, which seems like it should be a given. I mean, they let you play it on different computers just like that, yes?
Don't get me wrong, I use Steam for everything except MMOs. TF2, L4D2, I even bought Splinter Cell: Conviction over it not too long ago (unfortunately... stealth-a-way). So I don't hate Steam.
Well, they are the superior form of game distrubution.Anticitizen_Two said:ITT: How an incredibly minor complaint about Valve can still make the legions of fanboys pissed off.
Seriously, they're gonna take over the world some day.
(now watch someone respond with something like, "Well, at least if Valve took over the world, they would only make you work in the salt mines for 20 hours a day! Activision or EA would make you work all 24! Valve at least cares about their slaves!")