The Ewoks beat both! They captured the rebels strike team (Including the last Jedi in the galaxy) and could have killed and ate them, and they defeated a legion of the greatest stormtroopers.
Aren't there two massively popular video games set in the old republic, plus a MMO coming out set in that same time period?Mike Fang said:I have to go with rebellion, 'cause I tend to get sick of the "playing the bad guy is cool" conformity going on all the time. Though, really, one thing I"d like to know is when they're going to stop living in the prequel era and move on to develop stuff AFTER the fall of the empire. There's a great big golden land of opportunity for movie, tv and video game development in the after-Return-of-The-Jedi era that so far has only been touched by books, comics and wookiepedia. I think I've seen one game set in the post-fall Star Wars years, "Star Wars: Dark Forces II." Geeze people can we stop living in the damn era of Anakin Skywalker and Jar Jar Binks and MOVE ON?!
Read the books. That's all I will say. Also, if they're willing to blow up an entire planet of civilians just to make a point--keep in mind that many Imperials had family they, Tycho being one of them--then that should give you an idea of their policies.J03bot said:Until the prequel trilogy, it was never made clear why there even was a rebellion. The empire didn't seem overtly evil in anything other than the destruction of Alderaan (and yeah, the fact that Palpatine popped up and said 'I'm evil!').
I want to see a selection of empire policies that made rebelling a necessity. I want proof that the people of the empire were sufficiently subjugated that removing the emperor was in their best interests. How do we know that the rebels weren't just entitled douchebags looking to replace the current fascist state with a pseudo-republic of their own control?
Fine. When the original trilogy was first in production, and thus before the expanded universe had been delved in toSniper Team 4 said:Read the books. That's all I will say. Also, if they're willing to blow up an entire planet of civilians just to make a point--keep in mind that many Imperials had family they, Tycho being one of them--then that should give you an idea of their policies.J03bot said:Until the prequel trilogy, it was never made clear why there even was a rebellion. The empire didn't seem overtly evil in anything other than the destruction of Alderaan (and yeah, the fact that Palpatine popped up and said 'I'm evil!').
I want to see a selection of empire policies that made rebelling a necessity. I want proof that the people of the empire were sufficiently subjugated that removing the emperor was in their best interests. How do we know that the rebels weren't just entitled douchebags looking to replace the current fascist state with a pseudo-republic of their own control?
I'm on the side of the rebels all the way. I want to be part of Rogue Squadron if I can't be a Jedi.
*looks at avatar* Yeah,figures I 'spose....tc1259 said:The Empire all the way
What? The Rebel stuff looks kick ass, look at the goddamn X-Wing! The Tie Fighter in comparison falls short, in fact there's no reason it even has wings, the only reason planes on Earth have wings to force the air below it to push it up, with that gone (being in space and all where there IS no air) you could just get the wings cut off and have all these metal balls which are just as effective and are alot harder to spot and shoot at making them doubly more effective.Sean Hollyman said:Which do you prefer?
I really hate the Rebels (REBEL SCUM!!), and always root for the Empire in the games/films.
The Rebels have no cool stuff, and they just overall suck, except for a few characters.