Funnily enough, Starcraft has all those things.latiasracer said:You like Sci-Fi?
You like Tanks?
You like 'MERICAAAAAAAAA (and tanks)
You should check it out, it's the game that brought me into the RTS scene in the first place, something Blizzard, Age of Empires and Command and Conquer wasn't able to do. It's innovative, interesting and quite different from the general RTS formula, and it looks pretty good as well. Also you can blow up most of the terrain if you want to, which is always satisfying.samnoxid said:No i haven't because i am put off RTS's set in modern(ish) eras but i don't know why. I guess im just afraid to try new things but saying that i really enjoyed rise of nations which goes though lots of time periods, from everyone throwing rocks at each other to launching nukes in the information age, so i should really be willing to give it a try! :L Thanks i will try looking it up.AC10 said:Have you tried company of heroes? It's probably my favourite RTS released in the last 10 years.
I have rise of legends but i didn't enjoy it as much as i did rise of nations.The Last Nomad said:I was about to suggest Rise Of Nations, but it seems you've already played that. Maybe you could try the sorta-sequel Rise of Legends, I never played it myself but it looks almost as good, with a bit of magic and fantasy thrown in.
Or you could just go with Age of Empires, can't fail with that. AoE 2 and its expansion are probably the best. I played a demo of 3 and it didn't really impress me all that much, don't remember much empire building...
I already have AoE 1 and 2 which is why i want to try 3DasDestroyer said:If you're going to try Age of Empires then I suggest you try I or II instead of III.
Starcraft 2 seems to be the RTS I play most as of late, so give that a try too.
Nice list and i have the star wars one and while i really enjoyed the space battles i found that the ground battles just were not my cup of tea :LIlikemilkshake said:Sins of a Solar Empire is a frikkin awesome game.
Basically you start of with 1 planet under your control, and the aim of the game is to dominate and expand your empire across the known universe.
You end up having massive battles with numerous empires controlling hundreds upon hundreds of ships fighting it out. There's no land battles though it's all in space which is pretty awesome.
Star Wars: Empire at War is a similar theme just on a much smaller scale and set in the Star Wars universe, there's land battles in it aswell as space ones if you're interested in that.
The Total War series is awesome aswell. I enjoy almost all of them, although most of the older ones are hard to play now given how outdated the AI is.
Mount & Blade: Warband is an awesome game, its a mix of an RTS and a first person RPG. Its got some really awesome fighting mechanics which are quite realistic, it seems odd at first but once you get the hang of it its hard to understand why everygame doesnt use them. You start of as a simple mercenary or tournement fighter but eventually you and your warband can conquer the entire continent.
Europa Universalis 3 is real time but not in the traditional sense, there's not alot of action to control. Its an empire building/nation management game.. not everyones cup of tea but its alot of fun especially if you're into history and/or messing with history, You can play as any country that existed between 1400-1800 so there's tonnnnes of replayability.
Hearts of Iron 3. Pretty much the same as Europa but set in the 1930's-40's
anddd thats all i can think of just now.
I'm defenetly more used to the "straight up RTS" but im willing to try out anything if they sound interestingMercurySteam said:It depends on which type of RTS you enjoy. I can recommend you some that focus on different RTS aspects.samnoxid said:Thanks in advance![]()
If you enjoy a straight up RTS with basebuilding, army building and want a great story and amazing cutscences with a bit of army customisation mixed in then Starcraft II: Wings of Liberty will sate your needs.
If you prefer a game where yo can build up a city and a civilisation and basically create your own paradise then Anno 2070 is a great choice. It looks beautiful, has interesting missions and will suck you in and take up a lot of your time. It's easy for beginners, but you do have to do a fair bit of reading to learn how the game works.
If you would like a combat based RTS where you only control a single sqaud, but you still want to able to customise their abilities and equipment without overloading you with customisation choices like Mass Effect 1, but also lets you play the story with different squads to keep things interesting then look no further than Dawn of War II: Retribution. It's way more refined than DoW II or DoW II: Chaos Rising and let's you play as Eldar, Orks, Space Marines, Imperial Guard, Tyranids or Chaos Marines with different characters and armies driving each race towards the same goal.
I myself played a lot of RTS games like Red Alert 3 Command & Conquer 3 (Tiberium Wars and Kane's Wrath) and when I tried SarCraft: II I was suprised because I'd never played an RTS where you can customise your army in between missions, plus you can also travel around the Hyperion and drink in the story and brilliant characters.samnoxid said:I'm defenetly more used to the "straight up RTS" but im willing to try out anything if they sound interesting![]()
Well like i said, Sins of a Solar Empire is awesome. Its basically Empire at War times a thousand but without the land battles (which for the record i didnt really like either, i'd always skip them if i could)samnoxid said:Nice list and i have the star wars one and while i really enjoyed the space battles i found that the ground battles just were not my cup of tea :LIlikemilkshake said:snip
Oh, well I personally didn't like AoE 3, but I guess it is worth trying.samnoxid said:I already have AoE 1 and 2 which is why i want to try 3![]()
Wait, how is "Hard to master" a con? "Easy to learn but hard to master" is pretty much the scheme that every competitive/skill-based/strategy-based game strives towards, since it means that anybody can pick it up, yet it will take people a great deal of effort to become "one of the best", and if they do, they can still better themselves.b15h4m0n said:StarCraft 2 - Wings of Liberty
Pros:
+ BALANCED, COMPETITIVE multiplayer gameplay
+ Interesting world/campaign storyline
+ Hyper-Active community (casts, tournaments, BarCrafts, leagues etc)
+ Lots of custom maps on b.net (almost like you're buying more than one game)
+ Fast paced, with little to no downtime during a match
+ Easy to learn
Cons:
- Hard to master
- Fast paced
- Addictive as hell, not only when playing (watching streams, reading etc)
samnoxid said:I have already played some homeworld games, and i quite enjoyed themlatiasracer said:samnoxid said:I am really in the mood for a good RTS to play but i havent found one i have liked for years, although i admit i haven't been looking too hard, and would appritiate any recomendations.
My all time favorite RTS is Age of Mytholgy. I have lost count of the amount of times i have come back to this game, i just absolutely love it, so a game similar to this would be preferable. The reason i liked it so much was for its decent length campaign which was a nice story and wasan't just a collection of random missions and the gameplay was solid in my opinion so i could have plenty of fun with skirmishes and online play.
Games that i have also enjoyed includes Warcraft 3, rise of nations and the stronghold series.
Also games im thinking of trying are age of empires 3, stronghold 3 and starcraft 2, so if anyone could comment on these that would be great.
Thanks in advance![]()
You like Sci-Fi?
Homeworld Saga
You like Tanks?
Ground Controll 1+2
You like 'MERICAAAAAAAAA (and tanks)
World in conflict (This is really very good!)![]()
As you're a fan of the "Classic RTS", I find it absolutely amazing that you haven't played Starcraft, which is basically the Godfather of the genre. It may not have the most bloated feature set, or the most imaginative IP, or the most progressive and revolutionary game play, but it's exceedingly well tuned.samnoxid said:I'm defenetly more used to the "straight up RTS" but im willing to try out anything if they sound interesting![]()
It's not as good, IMO.samnoxid said:I already have AoE 1 and 2 which is why i want to try 3
I think I played this. It wasn't my favorite but I had fun.CM156 said:Empires: Dawn of the Modern World is my favorite RTS.
It can be a con, if you:DasDestroyer said:Wait, how is "Hard to master" a con?