Reddit Bans Subreddits about Making Fun of Fat People, Neogaf, and others.

Recommended Videos

joshuaayt

Vocal SJW
Nov 15, 2009
1,988
0
0
Truly a devastating blow to assholes who like to make fun of fat people. A single tear.

There's literally thousands of subreddits, I think probably they just haven't gotten around to shutting down SlutJustice. Which, to be clear, they absolutely should, because harassment isn't OK.

There's nothing stopping jerks from going and making their own platform to be jerks, so this isn't a freedom of speech issue. No one's arresting people for this, or silencing them in any way, they're just saying "Hey, maybe this sort of conduct isn't acceptable, maybe go do it elsewhere."
 

jklinders

New member
Sep 21, 2010
945
0
0
I can't speak of the other subreddits but it looks like r/fatepeoplehate forgot to leave their shitslinging at home when they left their little corner. That tends to constitute a violation of one of their few rules which is actually about harassment.

Now is this a violation of freedom of speech? No, no it is not. Pretty sure they use US law and as such they can only break the first amendment if they are acting on behalf of the US government.

Is it censorship? Yes it is. They have the right to do just that as the owners of a private communications platform. Not every act of censorship is grounds for a rights violations accusation so that leads to the next question. Is that censorship being unevenly or unfairly applied? Not enough information. Will there be enough information? *shrug* Your guess is as good as mine. honestly their terms of use don't require them to give any explanation. I looked it up upon reading this thread and they have that standard caveat of "we can ban you and your forum at any time for any reason we see fit."

I know I am pissing in the wind here, but can we please stop with conflating the minimal overlap between censorship and freedom of speech violations? The hay fields can't keep up with the demand for all those strawmen being ordered.
 

DerangedHobo

New member
Jan 11, 2012
231
0
0
Freedom of speech, freedom of expression etc etc ad nauseum. That's the "ideal" anyway, in practice, you don't own the business or the space so they can tell you to get fucked with little recourse (that is my layman's understanding, anyway). However the main problem I have with it is that when you persecute an ideology, be it religious, political, whatever, you give that thought (or at least, it's believers) credibility. They feel as if they are being persecuted and that they are the repressed minority, regardless of how asinine or bat shit crazy that thought process is.
 

Silence

Living undeath to the fullest
Legacy
Sep 21, 2014
4,326
14
3
Country
Germany
1. It is apparently very clear that they don't really care about harrassment. I have yet to see evidence of the opposite.
Shitredditsays I don't know much about, but this sub was also of course not banned:


Edit: Oh, apparently they deleted the thread and made it more acceptable. I hope they also removed the doxxing information of Liana K.

2. It doesn't matter if it is censorship or not. Many people use Reddit, and if they feel censored, it leads to consequence (I can't believe I just used "muh feels" but whatever, it's true in this case).

3. People don't understand the Streisand effect. Wow. pls.


I couldn't give a shit about fatpeoplehate, but that tweet from boogie actually put something like a perspective in me:
People have hated me my whole life. It was actually kind of nice to see them organizing it to prove I wasn't just paranoid.
(https://twitter.com/Boogie2988/status/608772852293230592)
 

runic knight

New member
Mar 26, 2011
1,118
0
0
tm96 said:
BloatedGuppy said:
Not a freedom of speech issue.
Even if you flash in great big neon lights 24/7 people will still say it is. If this is censorship to some people does that mean schools saying don't swear is censorship?
Yes. Actually, yes, that is not only an issue of censorship by the basic definition of censorship, that possibly actively involves a government backed organization doing the censorship considering the funding of school and the general rulings against schools when applying other government restricting rules such as separation of church and state, thus may also be a first amendment right issue as well. It is very much an example of censorship. But much like the "you can't scream fire in a crowded movie theater" rule, when an argument can be made about the free speech interfering with other rights, the censorship tends to be accepted. So essentially like all rules, if the majority can tolerate it or find reasonable justification to do so, the censorship is accepted.

The problem with this current example is not so much reddit is dictating the rules for their site, as while still censorship, that is the nature of any working forum. The issue is the sudden, unevenly distributed, and heavy-handed response going down on a site that itself has claimed to stand for free speech. So you have a very strange nuclear option against a very disparate group of claimed offenders, most other offenders of worse are overlooked, and the sudden restriction seem nearly arbitrary excuse rather then enforcing of existing established rules in a fair way.

I think they alway forget they can do that. If they did that it at least make the internet at least a little better.
They are also the sole reason the site matters to anyone at all, and they know well that a site that offends the community who made it too much will quickly be passed by competitors. But much like yourself I imagine when a rule in your nation is passed you don't agree with, you don't tend to react the first time by throwing the baby out with the bathwater and moving to another country. Instead you'd likely express your dissatisfaction, try to work within the established system to get the change and should that fail, move on to more drastic options such as full exodus.

You know I find it interesting myself how quickly the "you can just leave" attitude comes up as an excuse for this weird sort of behavior in sites as though the users have no ability or right to disagree with the sites they promoted and helped grow in actual importance and value. Because lets be honest, without the people that are currently being pissed off right now, reddit itself would never have been worth a damn. So I can't blame those that want to stick with the site and get changes to what they see as something wrong with the current actions, even if it is protesting them shutting down specific subreddits with little to no discernible consistency while still claiming to be about free speech.
 

SecondPrize

New member
Mar 12, 2012
1,436
0
0
The silencing of discussion is a problem whether the government is involved or not. Reddit didn't violate anyone's constitutional right to freedom of speech, but they did stifle their freedom to speak, which is a shame given the platform's previous commitment to providing a platform for speaking freely.
 

PainInTheAssInternet

The Ship Magnificent
Dec 30, 2011
826
0
0
VanQ said:
Casual Shinji said:
Wow... I was never really familiar with Reddit, and now I thank God for that.
I'm only vaguely familiar in that I had a look around there when it was fairly new. Trust me, imageboards and traditional forums are a much better place to discuss things. The biggest problem with Reddit is the upvote system, which means that only the most popular opinions rise to the top while all others naturally sink to the deep depths of the thread where they'll likely never be seen or heard. It's groupthink on an organized scale.
I don't have much doubt that the above happens, but my experience is more along the lines of literal groupthink. The exact same jokes being repeated multiple times on the same thread. Just recently, there was an article about the possible discovery of 75 million year old tissue, and two separate comment sections consisted overwhelmingly of Jurassic Park references, often word-for-word copies of one another.

tm96 said:
BloatedGuppy said:
Not a freedom of speech issue.
Even if you flash in great big neon lights 24/7 people will still say it is. If this is censorship to some people does that mean schools saying don't swear is censorship?
I agree that what happened wasn't censorship, but your example is. It's a representative of the government telling you what you cannot do or say.

OT: Hooray! Some shitty subreddits are gone! That's a good start. There are quite a few to tackle, though this seems to have been just targeted at harassing groups. Now PunchableFaces should be next on the chopping block. All the subreddit does is single out people's pictures and hate on them.
 

Scars Unseen

^ ^ v v < > < > B A
May 7, 2009
3,028
0
0
Longing said:
Redditors are such whiny little babies. I cannot for the life of me understand the kind of people who would spend all of their days relentlessly mocking others. What sad, sad little people.
Casual Shinji said:
Wow... I was never really familiar with Reddit, and now I thank God for that.
Just so you know, Reddit isn't some unified community. There are subreddits like the ones mentioned in this thread, and yeah, they're pretty fucking awful(but then there's subreddits that spoof them like /r/farpeoplehate [http://www.reddit.com/r/farpeoplehate/]). And there are political and activist related subreddits that are pretty much giant echo chambers.

But then there are topic-focused subreddits. And those are some of the best places to discuss a specific topic to be found. They can be broad, like /r/anime/ [http://www.reddit.com/r/anime/] or /r/visualnovels/ [http://www.reddit.com/r/visualnovels/], or you can get more specific, such as /r/projecteternity/ [http://www.reddit.com/r/projecteternity/] or /r/xkcd/ [http://www.reddit.com/r/xkcd/]. Want to learn how to draw? /r/artfundamentals/ [http://www.reddit.com/r/ArtFundamentals/] wouldn't be a bad place to start. Or try /r/learnjapanese/ [http://www.reddit.com/r/LearnJapanese/] to start learning a new language(if the language you want to learn happens to be Japanese). Maybe you feel like listening to music and want to try something new. /r/listentothis/ [http://www.reddit.com/r/listentothis/] has you covered.

Reddit definitely has its dark and grungy side, but overall, it's the best place I've found for discussing most of the topics I'm interested in, including gaming.
 

GladiatorUA

New member
Jun 1, 2013
88
0
0
Damn it, Pao. Why FPH? If you decided to ban TumblrInAction or KotakuInAction, I could jump on Pao-hate bandwagon without a second thought. But FPH is a vitriolic circlejerk shitstain of subreddit... But it shouldn't have been banned. On the flip side r/thinpeoplehate is funny.

#firechairmanpao
 

BreakfastMan

Scandinavian Jawbreaker
Jul 22, 2010
4,367
0
0
The Lunatic said:
BreakfastMan said:
Spare me your grandstanding nonsense.

And seriously, what is the danger if this is unevenly applied? Or never invoked again? Reddit is only slightly improved instead of massively improved? I don't get why this is an issue. Nor do I get why people assume everything is going to be perfect and instantly fixed when a company says it is going to make improvements. That isn't how real life works.
Then, to put it bluntly, you don't understand freedom of speech. Regardless of what people say, they have a right to say it. I mean, sure, we may wish they wouldn't, but, the important part is allowing them to say it.
Sure. That doesn't mean every private enterprise needs to give them a platform. If people want to post sexist/racist/whatever crap they want, there are plenty of other websites that cater to that, like Stormfront and ReturnOfKings. Reddit doesn't have to allow that shit there.
 

kenu12345

Seeker of Ancient Knowledge
Aug 3, 2011
573
0
0
Wait, Neofag was banned? Why? Like I don't understand, was it cause of the word fag in the title? I'm gay and I like using that word for myself sometimes. Whats the big deal
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
13,054
6,748
118
Country
United Kingdom
Ehh, almost every site and forum moderates the content that is allowed.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
runic knight said:
Because lets be honest, without the people that are currently being pissed off right now, reddit itself would never have been worth a damn.
Yes, without the sterling denizens of r/fatpeoplehate or Neofag at its heart, reddit would never have been worth a damn.
 

layne

New member
Jun 14, 2013
43
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
Wow... I was never really familiar with Reddit, and now I thank God for that.
I feel the same way. I'm glad I've never been tempted to explore that particular area of the internet.
 

Somekindofgold

New member
Feb 24, 2015
67
0
0
Reddit claims they will only delete subreddits where their moderators aren't doing what they can to stop these sort of harassing posts, but we've seen that all it takes is one or two bad eggs and then they've got an excuse. We saw an example of how easily you can do this with the /gg/ 'brianna wu doxxing' , all it took was one post, which every other person in the thread called out, that was up for a few minutes before it got deleted, for the national media to permanently label you a hate group.

And like others have said, SRS is STILL up despite their well documented history of doxxing, that is evidence enough that this isnt a harassment crackdown otherwise they'd have been first on the chopping block.

This isnt about stopping hate, its about shutting the undesirables up.

As for why people are mad about this. Reddit got so popular because it offered an alternative to the censorship happy digg, that is what built Reddit, without that moderation style Reddit would have been nothing. The users feel betrayed and rightly so, so now they're leaving or protesting this. Sadly voat is currently down due to the influx of new users straining the site so for a few days the people who want to leave are going to stay and shit up the site to show their dissatisfaction.

Reddit can change its moderation style, its a private site, but the users of that site also have a right to call Chairman Pao every bad word under the sun and show their dissatisfaction.
 

Areloch

It's that one guy
Dec 10, 2012
623
0
0
Fappy said:
Eh, it's their site. If they want to ban certain discussions that's their prerogative. By all means, tell them their decision is wrong if you believe it to be, but I wouldn't call this censorship. There are other avenues still available to express these ideas and Reddit's CEO isn't stopping anyone from taking their business there.

They clearly want to change the site's image and clean up its content/community. I can hardly fault it for that, honestly. Reddit's rep is seemingly worse than 4chan these days.
This line of thinking seems weird to me. If a private site's censorship of it's userbase is acceptable on the grounds that they could just go elsewhere, couldn't we change a few words and do this:

Eh, it's their country. If they want to ban certain discussions that's their prerogative. By all means, tell them their decision is wrong if you believe it to be, but I wouldn't call this censorship. There are other countries still available to express these ideas and USA's Government isn't stopping anyone from taking their business there.

They clearly want to change the country's image and clean up its content/community. I can hardly fault it for that, honestly. USA's rep is seemingly worse than 4chan these days.
And justify government level censorship too?

Not saying I think privately-owned website censorship is as straightforward as governmental-tier, but the above is kind of a poor handwave of the possible censorship issue, isn't it?
 

Jux

Hmm
Sep 2, 2012
868
4
23
So reddit is a little less of a cesspool now? Good on them I suppose. And there aren't enough laughing gifs on the internet to encapsulate how I feel about people bemoaning this as some great attack on freedom of speech. Reddit is a privately owned platform, there are plenty of other places for people to spew their hate on the internet.
 

SecondPrize

New member
Mar 12, 2012
1,436
0
0
BloatedGuppy said:
runic knight said:
Because lets be honest, without the people that are currently being pissed off right now, reddit itself would never have been worth a damn.
Yes, without the sterling denizens of r/fatpeoplehate or Neofag at its heart, reddit would never have been worth a damn.
Is not liking neogaf a sin now? Yeah, fph is a place most people don't want to go, so they don't go there. But mocking neogaf is the right thing to do.

Jux said:
So reddit is a little less of a cesspool now? Good on them I suppose. And there aren't enough laughing gifs on the internet to encapsulate how I feel about people bemoaning this as some great attack on freedom of speech. Reddit is a privately owned platform, there are plenty of other places for people to spew their hate on the internet.
You understand that all these people are still on reddit, right? They just removed the containment boards.