Swine what? Was their a pig epidemic or something?theironbat46 said:I was talking to my friend 2 days ago and we got onto the long forgotten topic swine flu. Do any of you remember Swine Flu? The last I heard of it was March. Then it just flew out of existence. Personally, I think the Oil Spill killed it, then it will kill our bad Econmy.
Edit: Also, I got the next day. The swine flu must of heard me.
Ok, let's put it this way. I had a huge temperature, no energy, trouble breathing, inability to eat or walk, I'd been in direct contact with someone who had swine flu, and I had to be lifted home because I couldn't focus on walking.deus-ex-machina said:You still didn't answer my question.The symptoms you listed could still have been a bad sniffly cold. Man-flu, perhaps? It was very easy to test for and unless you're a microbiologist and you tested yourself, saying you KNOW you had it still doesn't mean much, even if you spell it in capitals.
In all fairness, SARS was actually pretty deadly. In china, people were executed because they had SARS. The inability to find a cure for that occationally deadly epidemic turned into a 100% death rate for those that had it based on the nation a person caught it in.findler said:Oh and don't forget West Nile, Mad Cow and SARS!
Yeah, but until we hit that point, it was so facepalm inducing how people were flipping out. Here's a bunch of hand sanitizer EVERYWHERE, don't leave your house if you have even the slightest fever, etc etc... So silly.child of lileth said:It went away long before the oil spill. Besides that, it's no more dangerous than the normal flu. Once people realized that, it wasn't worth mentioning anymore.
Care to give a source on that overstated lethality and it being no more contagious than any other influenza?ZephrC said:No. It was never any more contagious or deadly than any of the other forms of influenza that have been around for centuries. This particular form only even got on the news because a couple Mexican doctors overstated how fatal it was in the first couple weeks and it's a distant relative of the Spanish Influenza, which was actually bad. The whole thing was in reality a sadly overhyped mess.SakSak said:However, in the case of potentially pandemic diseases there is a correlation between public and private action, availability of information, and reduced severity of said disease.findler said:Hahaha I was just thinking about how stupid the whole swine flu thing was the other day and how it went away virtually overnight. They always want just one big story to hype over and over and over. Remember before the oil spill it was Haiti? Now I never see stories on that. Even the spill is getting stale, prepare yourself for the next tragedy.
The reason we do not hear of swine fly anymore is because all the measures taken reduced the threat of pandemic to levels where it is no longer any more dangerous than common seasonal influenza. Because in the case of global diseases the one thing we lack is time to respond and develop medicines, as well as build resistance on population scale. Washing/disinfecting hands, visibility in media (for informational, educational purposes and repeating of given preventitive instructions), and extraordinary measures at transportation hubs and entertainment centers etc can drastically buy that time.
It wasn't a case of hype, it was a case genuinely global deadly disease that was defeated in part due to said 'hype'.
Here's the overstated lethatlity (They mention it at the bottom): http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2009/05/swine-flu-us-ca.htmlSakSak said:Care to give a source on that overstated lethality and it being no more contagious than any other influenza?