REPORT: US Military to Research Pew-Based Weaponry

Recommended Videos

PsychicTaco115

I've Been Having These Weird Dreams Lately...
Legacy
Mar 17, 2012
5,950
14
43
Country
United States
[Img_Inline width="300" height="240" Caption="Officers converge on Ferguson protests with prototype pew guns="right"]http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3112/3127767089_f5a736f813.jpg[/Img_Inline]

Earlier today, the US Military announced that they want to focus more of the defense budget on the research of what they deem "Pew-Based" weapons.

"Laser guns, laser beams, anything laser is the way of the future" said US Department of Defense Chuck Hagel.

When asked whether or not such weapons are even possible in a doable timeframe, Hagel answered quickly.

"Look, war flat-out sucks. If we make the weapons make silly noises, we think people won't take war as seriously and we'll have a fresh wave of recruits who just want to play laser tag. As we speak, we've sent a shipment of weapons to Ferguson and we'll see how they do there."

Hagel also told us where the inspiration for such a daunting project came from.

"Every kid wants a space blaster, every adult wants a laser beam and every general wants to minimize the amount of bloody corpses that make it to the media. It's a win-win-win."

The first budget report will be coming out sometime in the next few years.

Source

-TACO News: Barely Meets the Deadlines
<color=darkred>Older News: <url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.858917-REPORT-White-Man-to-go-on-Apology-Tour-for-Slavery#comment_form#comment_form>White Man to go on Apology Tour for Slavery[/color]
 

Barbas

ExQQxv1D1ns
Oct 28, 2013
33,804
0
0
Well as any avid reader of Warhammer fiction can tell you, las weaponry certainly may sting like a ***** but at least it cauterizes the wound. That means less time spent moping in hospitals and more time tagging and bagging!

I for one welcome this important step on the road to a more tacticool future.
 

Euryalus

New member
Jun 30, 2012
4,429
0
0
You joke, but lasers are one of the heavier research areas the DOD's involved in. They actually were able to properly weaponize a few chemical laser designs, but ultimately chemical lasers were deemed to risky if I recall. The idea of carrying around all those volatile chemicals didn't sit very well with the military for mass production/use.

The ideal design they'd want is a 100 kW or more Free electron laser so they can switch between wavelengths.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,170
143
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
Pah, the US army's pew-based weaponry is no match for my laser-equipped sharks, next please.
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,836
0
0


Let's face it, if if they reduce people into ash, it will reduce wounded casualties in war by 200%!

Really, its more humane.
 

Supernova1138

New member
Oct 24, 2011
408
0
0
Redlin5 said:


Let's face it, if if they reduce people into ash, it will reduce wounded casualties in war by 200%!

Really, its more humane.
No, we really need to focus more on Plasma weaponry, as turning your enemy into green goo is cooler than turning your enemy into dust.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
T0ad 0f Truth said:
You joke, but lasers are one of the heavier research areas the DOD's involved in. They actually were able to properly weaponize a few chemical laser designs, but ultimately chemical lasers were deemed to risky if I recall. The idea of carrying around all those volatile chemicals didn't sit very well with the military for mass production/use.

The ideal design they'd want is a 100 kW or more Free electron laser so they can switch between wavelengths.
God bless DARPA, the premier researcher into both Super Science, and Mad Science. Fire up the Tesla Coils and bring out the 200 scientist choir hired just for mad cackling!

Chemical lasers were abandoned by DARPA is 2012, and they've since moved on to electrical laser systems. The chemical 'cartridges' were deemed simply too dangerous in storage and in usage, which is something to consider when your talking about an organization that has hundreds of tons of explosives, fuel, and nukes laying around all over the place.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
You have no idea how sad and disappointed I am that this is not, in fact, about a tank that fires church pews. ;____;
 

Ghost_Star

New member
Apr 24, 2011
6
0
0
For a second there i thought they were gonna weaponise pewdiepie, everything went better than expected.
 

spartan231490

New member
Jan 14, 2010
5,186
0
0
Oh yay, experimenting with lethal military weapons in a city that rioted in response to excessive force from overzealous militarized police forces, what could possibly go wrong?
 

Harpalyce

Social Justice Cleric
Mar 1, 2012
141
0
0
I hate to tell you this, Ace Journalist Taco, but it appears you've mixed up images to run with this article. Here's the correct one...[footnote]yes I realize this joke has been already made, no I don't care, I am unrepentant to the core[/footnote]

 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
I have good faith in this project. Last year they came out with a new type of kleenex, and it was nothing to sneeze at.