Lyri said:
Why would you even announce that this is actually possible and not just quietly get into contact with the developers of the brand and discuss your findings?
Regrettably, sometimes a release like this is the only way to get companies to act on this kind of information. Sometimes people in positions of power can be very cavalier about the possibility of other people's lives being in jeopardy, judging the danger to be too remote to warrant acting upon. If someone
did act on it, it could well take a very long time before anyone discovered the means by which people were being killed. Patients with serious heart conditions dying? Not a surprise to anyone. And having all patients who had that brand of pacemaker come in for a firmware reset- or possibly a replacement- would not be cheap or easy, and result in a significant PR black eye.
Also, he only did the experiment on one brand; that's not to say that others might not be similarly hackable. By making this information public, he gives companies he
hasn't tested reason to make sure that if they need security protocols on their software, it's up to snuff.
And finally, there's nothing in the article to say that he
didn't make that information available to the company- and for all the reasons above, subsequently making the information public may have been the right call.
I'm surprised no one has made a Cheney joke yet. Tasteful bunch.