Responsible Gaming.

Recommended Videos

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
Not 20-minutes ago while I was washing my hair, I was thinking about video games and their recent history as an excuse for vile, immoral behaviour. The people who blame video games may be trying to escape responsibility for their own actions.

For as long as I can remember, the British (or English speaking) media blamed video games such as GTA (Grand Theft Auto) for children as young as 12 rioting and looting, but quickly revoked that idea from intense pressure from outside sources. The ACL?s (Australian Christian Lobby) representative Jim Wallace blamed the Norway massacre on video games after he leaned that Anders Breivik?s manifesto was made mention of how he used the game Modern Warfare 2 as ?training.? This pushed his anti-gaming agenda into the public spotlight again. The ACL also neglected to mention that Breivik was one of their own, a conservative Christian.

I?m in agreement that there is some evidence video games can impair a young person?s attention span, desensitise them or even lead them to violent behaviour, it?s not the only cause of such personality changes. There is evidence that aggressive children were already displaying these tendencies before they began playing video games.

I was at a GAME store one afternoon after I finished work. I was looking for the Batman: Arkham Asylum game. While I was talking to a staff member a young mother came up to the counter with her son who didn?t look any older than eight. She held a copy of Call of Duty 4 in her hand.

?I?d like to purchase this please,? she placed the copy of the game on the counter. The MA15+ sticker on the cover was clearly visible. She placed her hand on the back of her son?s neck. For a second, I thought about telling this woman off. Thankfully, the clerk restored my faith in gamers. ?You realise this game isn?t suitable for your son? This is rated R18 for adults. I?d recommend buying him a different game,?

Maybe she hadn?t thought of it; he had provided her with a reasonable suggestion. She might not have been aware of the contents of the game, but she blew him off with, ?I?m sure he can handle it. He?s mature for his age.?

This is where I really wanted the clerk to make her sign a legal document waiving her right to *****, moan, complain or subsequently blame video games on her son becoming a deviant.

Thankfully, the government will soon be introducing an appropriate rating for adult-themed games ensuring that young people won?t be able to buy games so easily and get the rest of us in trouble.

As the gaming community?s voice grows, I feel we need to take a greater responsibility for our actions and the actions of others around us. As I wrote above, the ACL found it easy to lay all responsibility upon the shoulders of video games without looking his own religion. What I took away from his speech was that he thought the entire gaming community to be a bunch of murdering, corrupt psychos-in-waiting and that we?re all as bad as each other. A counter-statement during the same interview was presented by Seamus Byrne. He said, (sic) ?Breivik referenced the Bible and Christianity hundreds of times, but I don?t hold all Christians to blame.?

Somehow, Wallace?s close-minded statement can be related back to an old proverb, ?People fear what they do not understand?. The gaming community is a hard community to understand from the outside. We play games where we shoot people, pilot spaceships to far away galaxies and even simulate real life. We indulge in games that take the player away from reality. Often, we could take an active role in the activities we?re simulating in the games we play if we were motivated enough, but we instead sit on a comfy chair and switch off for a few hours. I understand how we might be seen as brainless miscreants, but I?ve seen the gaming community do more. We have been pro-active in our quest to ensure that our pastime isn?t misinterpreted as merely an interactive cartoon for children, but we also aren?t the most understanding people in the world either.

Those who play games tend to interpret criticism as a personal attack and respond as so which perpetuates the idea that we?re aggressive, short-tempered people. I know I've been guilty of it from time to time myself. This is another part of gaming responsibly that we need to be aware of. While others may bait gamers, tear gamers down or call us horrible names. We collectively need to remember that words should not hurt or worry us and we can take the high road.

Gaming probably will always be looked upon as an easy target for blame because of the topics that are sometimes encountered in our hobby. While gaming can be used to bring people together, discuss difficult topics, educate, and engage us in new ways , those who don?t devote time or try to understand it will find it easy to abuse their lack of knowledge or use their own agenda to over-shadow the good video games can do.

Rade is trying her hardest to get her <a href=www.dailyrade.wordpress.com>blog off the ground. Talking about important topics in gaming, you're welcome to subscribe!
 

Sean Steele

New member
Mar 30, 2010
243
0
0
Why? Book readers do not need to apologise for the Oklahoma City Bombing after Timmothy McVae read "The Turner Diaries." Music fans did not need to take responsability or overtly disavow Charles Manson after he overtly linked his own crimes to a Beatles Song. The concept of the source of media the criminal enjoyed being blamed as opposed to the criminal themselves only comes on fringe media. (Comic Books early on, Movies early on, various genres of music in their infancy and now Videogames.) We should not have to sit there and try to run PR for people who don't know anything about games and use it as a scapegoat. Their opinion should not matter, because it is always an uneducated and ill informed one.
 

werty10089

New member
Aug 14, 2011
210
0
0
1000 pages worth of debates, summarized into a short nifty paragraph. You my good sir, we thank you.
 

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
Sean Steele said:
Why? Book readers do not need to apologise for the Oklahoma City Bombing after Timmothy McVae read "The Turner Diaries." Music fans did not need to take responsability or overtly disavow Charles Manson after he overtly linked his own crimes to a Beatles Song. The concept of the source of media the criminal enjoyed being blamed as opposed to the criminal themselves only comes on fringe media. (Comic Books early on, Movies early on, various genres of music in their infancy and now Videogames.) We should not have to sit there and try to run PR for people who don't know anything about games and use it as a scapegoat. Their opinion should not matter, because it is always an uneducated and ill informed one.
Which is entirely true, but when our side of the fence is screaming things back, it doesn't make us look good. Would you rather be known as a warmongering idiot or someone who accepts their opinions but takes the higher ground. I'm trying to encourage gamers to take the high road so our hobby/pass-time/career can be as accepted as film or books.

Look at Twilight: It's a terrible series that has a rabid fan base. If you say something horrible about it, the fans get violent which makes the series worse. But the author accepts what the "haters" say and doesn't really get involved.
 

Sean Steele

New member
Mar 30, 2010
243
0
0
Or we could just ignore/laugh at them. If we start pretending like their opinion is valid they will think it is. The entire 'pretend like both sides have a valid arguement' notion weakens debate completely. To often I see people being purely unashamedly wrong in something and expecting to get their half of the arguement as fairly aknowledged as someone who genuinely knows what that they are talking about. Thats why someone who says gay marriage is unconstitutional gets to sit across from the educated lawyer who says they are wrong, and a creationist always gets to present themselves as equally qualified to debate evolution as a PHD Biologist.
 

Flailing Escapist

New member
Apr 13, 2011
1,602
0
0
Give it 50 years.
There will be a new form of entertainment just starting to blossom by then.
And everybody will pick on it!
 

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
Sean Steele said:
Or we could just ignore/laugh at them. If we start pretending like their opinion is valid they will think it is. The entire 'pretend like both sides have a valid arguement' notion weakens debate completely. To often I see people being purely unashamedly wrong in something and expecting to get their half of the arguement as fairly aknowledged as someone who genuinely knows what that they are talking about. Thats why someone who says gay marriage is unconstitutional gets to sit across from the educated lawyer who says they are wrong, and a creationist always gets to present themselves as equally qualified to debate evolution as a PHD Biologist.
I'm not saying that. If you want the debate to end, you need to find a middle ground. There's no point in burying your head in the sand and say "If I can't see you, your argument is invalid", it's just as immature as the other side. There's proof for both but it doesn't completely disprove the other side.
 

Sinclair Solutions

New member
Jul 22, 2010
1,611
0
0
I think the people at Gamestop (at least, the ones I visit) do all that should be done when it comes to violent games. They calmly ask if I am old enough to buy the game, and, if a parent is there, they mention the game rating and all that it contains. Much like the clerk in the original post did. Anything beyond that is up to the parent. We cannot hold people's hands and withhold responsibility from them. The mother in the post is responsible for what her child plays, and she should be the one controlling what she does and does not buy for her child. She should have researched it. She should know what he child can handle. It is the woman's responsibility to be a good parent and do what is right for her child. If she came in a few days later ranting about the violence, the clerk could plainly tell her that it was because she was irresponsible with her purchase and that she decided to buy the game despite his warning. And then she will learn from the experience and maybe start researching games in the future.

But I doubt we could find a way for the masses to be informed. There are already thousands of videos and articles about what game ratings mean. People don't read or watch them. So let them be ignorant. Know that you and I and everyone else on this site will be responsible. Don't pander to their ignorance, respect your own knowledge.
 

Total LOLige

New member
Jul 17, 2009
2,123
0
0
Nice summary. No one ever blames religion, it's caused more wars and murders than video games, books, films and whatever else.

That mum is way too lenient I was barley allowed to play a 12+ at age 11.
P.S the link to your blog won't work. Might just be me.
 

Sean Steele

New member
Mar 30, 2010
243
0
0
As someone whose parents decided to let the Mario Brothers Lu Kang and Duke Nukem work part full time as my nanny I don't really think playing violent things as a child or seeing it stops you from being a well adjusted adult.

Cause you know, I'm awesome.
 

Phoenix Arrow

New member
Sep 3, 2008
1,377
0
0
There is nothing you can do.
People grow up in their own bubble of influence and anything new that threatens this bubble will ultimately be sinful. The media knows that and plays it to their advantage. It's why all new technology is rumoured to cause cancer. It'll pass with time. Something else will be to blame and one day, the generations who grew up with video games will be in charge and will know the situation.

There's really no point in fighting in my opinion, unless they try to ban stuff, it's all just hot air designed to point fingers. It genuinely doesn't affect anything and I have more important things to do with my life than fight meaningless battles that can't be won.

Besides, if you rise to the bait, you've already lost. If you want to prove the validity of games, don't get irate over stuff like this and don't wave some kind of banner. Just get on with life.

ToTaL LoLiGe said:
No one ever blames religion,
...yeah, Muslims never get blamed for anything.
 

5BlueBars

New member
Aug 18, 2011
3
0
0
ToTaL LoLiGe said:
Nice summary. No one ever blames religion, it's caused more wars and murders than video games, books, films and whatever else.

That mum is way too lenient I was barley allowed to play a 12+ at age 11.
P.S the link to your blog won't work. Might just be me.
Unfortunate because I played Half Life when I was 4. With my dads supervision of course, but that did spark my gaming "Career".

Ontopic, people will always be ignorant to what they don't know. You made very good points though, kudos.
 

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
ToTaL LoLiGe said:
Nice summary. No one ever blames religion, it's caused more wars and murders than video games, books, films and whatever else.

That mum is way too lenient I was barley allowed to play a 12+ at age 11.
P.S the link to your blog won't work. Might just be me.
www.dailyrade.wordpress.com

For some reason, Escapist links its URL in with some external URLs.
 

Zantos

New member
Jan 5, 2011
3,653
0
0
My father, who is almost 60 and has never seen my gaming habits as anything more than "a phase to grow out of", today went into GAME with me as I went to buy a particularly violent game, something which he often does if I'm after something specific. Nothing short of Prototype, which has a big 18 on the front, most like for "fucking obscenely violent in ways that don't even make sense". As I queued, someone was arguing with the assistant about how the game she had bought for her 10 year old child was making him overly aggressive (It was one of the Call of Duties, I think BlOps). My Dad went to her and said "My son owns that game, and he's one of the most kind and thoughtful young adults I know. It clearly says 18 on the box, why would you buy this for a young child? I think the aggression maybe comes from someone stupid enough to not read a box cover but angry enough to shout at an innocent cashier about it."

The message I suppose, it doesn't matter if someone doesn't understand gaming, and it probably never will. Even those well outside the community that would never think about joining it can still support us against blind stupidity. All we are is a scapegoat, and if we can stand by and show we're all decent mature people with a decent hobby, it'll speak wonders. I don't know how relevent this ended up being, but I thought it was an awesome story.
 

Total LOLige

New member
Jul 17, 2009
2,123
0
0
Radelaide said:
www.dailyrade.wordpress.com

For some reason, Escapist links its URL in with some external URLs.
I think I've subscribed.
Phoenix Arrow said:
ToTaL LoLiGe said:
No one ever blames religion,
...yeah, Muslims never get blamed for anything.
What I was getting at was that the head of the ACL didn't say anything about him being christian.
 

let's rock

New member
Jun 15, 2011
372
0
0
Radelaide said:
This is where I really wanted the clerk to make her sign a legal document waiving her right to *****, moan, complain or subsequently blame video games on her son becoming a deviant
I swear If this guy did this he should be fucking knighted and personaly given a thank you card hand signed by the leader of every major country in the world
 

Darklink82

New member
Jun 30, 2011
9
0
0
I actually did a report on this in school (yes I am that nerdy) and I figured that the only reason games are picked on is because people do not understand them, or they simply want a scapegoat onto which they can blame haneous crimes. An example of this is when Jack Tompson blamed a school shooting on counter strike before the name of the shooter had been anounced. However we do need to get rid of the people who threaten to skullfuck people's moms because they prefer one game over another. I take responsibility and I respect other people's opinions. Except for when they threaten to skullfuck my mom, then i want to track them down and debate their logic and then send them to a phsyco ward.
 

Radelaide

New member
May 15, 2008
2,503
0
0
Darklink82 said:
I actually did a report on this in school (yes I am that nerdy) and I figured that the only reason games are picked on is because people do not understand them, or they simply want a scapegoat onto which they can blame haneous crimes. An example of this is when Jack Tompson blamed a school shooting on counter strike before the name of the shooter had been anounced. However we do need to get rid of the people who threaten to skullfuck people's moms because they prefer one game over another. I take responsibility and I respect other people's opinions. Except for when they threaten to skullfuck my mom, then i want to track them down and debate their logic and then send them to a phsyco ward.
Skull-fucking mothers seems somewhat excessive, but that's the behaviour I'm trying to discourage!