I just had a flashback of doing an essay on train wrecks and stumbling upon that. *Shudders* I don't think I've ever closed my browser down that fast before. *Twitch*Daveman said:Thomas the tank engine. That would make me violently sick.
Second!! Oh big time second! *shudder* It's that stupid rule that makes me a fan of "corrective programming" (essentially brainwashing).DJDarque said:I'm going to go ahead and say all of it.
This kind of intrigues me, good sir. This sounds like comedic gold in, and of itself! XDCasual Shinji said:Odd celebrity porn.
Those freaky photorealistic faces staring at me from a top bodies in compromizing positions, their photoshopped headshots seemingly unaware of the actions they're partaking in.
I can take all kind of weirdness, but this just freaks me the fuck out.
One of the least important sciences in Rule 34 is anatomy.TheDarkEricDraven said:The vast majority of western animation, with a less then a hand full of exceptions, like Daria.
But...toys don't HAVE genitals. They are like Ken and Barbie dolls! Especialy Ken and Barbie!Jezzascmezza said:Toy Story porn.
I know it probably exists, but I never ever want to see it, because if I did, it would literally ruin many of my childhood memories/feelings...
<img width=400>http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS1SDYAmLTHrNsvB8sU6RYXtE2A7h1vlyHdAHbsmb9BH4VjdeA0jJQB6XecsQCeress said:Is there rule 34 of rule 34? D: