A simple thread really.
Those 2 unique RTS have been largely ignored (the former so much to the point of being "one of the most underappreciated games of all time") and there are cases where the reviewers that DO care to play it dont enlight much on the problems they may have (COUGHyahtzeeCOUGH). Is it really that hard to give an honest opinion on what does and doesnt work? Do you have to have an expertice on RTS games or every genre those games made off to deal with something this unique?
I ask you, the gamers, your opinion on the subject. We should at least start with what those games did right and wrong just at first sight without any knowledge of RTS or of what a genre even IS. Then we compare the games in a more global sence, like what did manage to innovate both inside and outside their genres.
Those 2 unique RTS have been largely ignored (the former so much to the point of being "one of the most underappreciated games of all time") and there are cases where the reviewers that DO care to play it dont enlight much on the problems they may have (COUGHyahtzeeCOUGH). Is it really that hard to give an honest opinion on what does and doesnt work? Do you have to have an expertice on RTS games or every genre those games made off to deal with something this unique?
I ask you, the gamers, your opinion on the subject. We should at least start with what those games did right and wrong just at first sight without any knowledge of RTS or of what a genre even IS. Then we compare the games in a more global sence, like what did manage to innovate both inside and outside their genres.