If you've already got something, don't try to risk losing it to get more: You already have the bird...don't risk it getting away by going for the two that are in the bush.King Toasty said:"A bird in the bush is worth two in the hand."
What?
If you've already got something, don't try to risk losing it to get more: You already have the bird...don't risk it getting away by going for the two that are in the bush.King Toasty said:"A bird in the bush is worth two in the hand."
What?
It's a result of a belief that wishing an actor good luck in a performance would jinx them, as such saying "break a leg", is an understood replacement for wishing good luck without literally doing so.Cyd0n1a said:"Break a leg!"
Makes no fucking sense. Breaking a leg is not fun nor is it something that one usually has a good time doing.
Actually that is a very very long story but long story short a along time ago a life form living in the sky carried objects including people into the sky until they would pass out of the lack of oxygen before carrying them across a distance then setting them swiftly but safely on the ground leaving the person or in this case cat or dog extremely disorientated as you could imagine while there is no hard evidence supporting this theory i am however open to theories such as this, hence the raining of the cats and the dogs.Akytalusia said:"it's raining cats and dogs" never made a lick of sense to me. anyone care to explain?
A tourist at the top of The World Trade Center, 9/11 2001.Shreder55 said:"At the wrong place at the wrong time"
Never really got it. If your at the wrong place at the wrong time then you should be fine because its the wrong time. What it should be is,
Wrong place at the right time.
or
Right place at the wrong time.
thylasos said:It's a result of a belief that wishing an actor good luck in a performance would jinx them, as such saying "break a leg", is an understood replacement for wishing good luck without literally doing so.Cyd0n1a said:"Break a leg!"
Makes no fucking sense. Breaking a leg is not fun nor is it something that one usually has a good time doing.
A while ago "prove" meant the same thing as "test" (hence, "proving ground"). This phrase was never really updated. Therefore, "the exception that proves the rule" means "the exception that tests the rule". Doesn't make the rule any more valid as a result, only that it's being tested (and most likely is wrong).TheDarkEricDraven said:"The exception that proves the rule". What the fuck does that mean? If its an exception, it doesn't prove anything!
This makes the most sense when you say it in reverse. "You can't eat your cake and have it too"supersupersuperguy said:I've never understood what it meant to "have one's cake and eat it too". I mean, what else are you going to do with a cake? A cake is functionally useless if you can't eat it. Unless, of course, you're going to throw it at someone, and I'm sure not going to do that. It's my cake! I have it and I'm going to eat it, too!
This. Jesus I hate this. "There's an exception to every rule" I kind of get, since that can be true enough (not in science), but proving the rule? Wat?TheDarkEricDraven said:"The exception that proves the rule". What the fuck does that mean? If its an exception, it doesn't prove anything!
Because it is better to have experienced love, and then had your heart broken, than to never have experienced love at all.Phantomess said:Thoroughly agree. Worst saying ever. Honestly, since when has getting your heart broken been better than not having it broken at all?shadyh8er said:"It's better to have loved and lost, than to have never loved at all."
Sorry hon, but I've seen what happens to people who love and lose. It ain't pretty!
Either you didn't get my sarcasm, or i'm not getting yours.Danny Ocean said:It means close your book/laptop, sit down, and stop making noise. It's an order to listen.Sizzle Montyjing said:Shut up, sit down and be quiet.
I seriously have no clue to what that means, but it usually is said halfway through one of my riveting speeches.
Can anyone explain?
I always thought the person/people who split the atom must hate that phrase! "FUCKING HELL I SPLIT THE ATOM AND STILL SLICED BREAD IS THE MEASURE OF BRILLIANCE!!"Arkvoodle said:"Greatest thing since sliced bread." What the hell's so great about bread slices???
Bad grammar.People use this to imply that they have no knowledge of a particular subject.It's a double negative though so it in fact means that they do have knowledge.The proper thing to say would be "I know nothing"Alon Shechter said:"I don't know nothing."
I don't get it.
"Less haste,more speed" - this means that the faster you try to do something the more likely you are to make mistakes which may cause you to have to redo it.Therefore it's better to take your time and do something properly as it ultimately may end up being faster that wayexcusablegold said:"less haste more speed"
wait, what?
or even better:
"i dont know 'im for a bar 'o soap"
serously...why?
Same friend, this video was posted in another thread. I'm now fully up to date with them and a good few hours deprived of sleep. Love David MitchellJinxyKatte said:I hope you're happy, I was getting ready to go to sleep until you showed me that vid. Now I can't stop watching them.Kiefer13 said:This is more just a mistake rather than an actual saying, but I *really* don't understand why some people feel that the phrase "I could care less" (rather than "I couldn't care less") actually makes sense.
David Mitchell explains it better than I.
<YOUTUBE=om7O0MFkmpw>
But it's the emphasis on could. I could care less, it's entirely within the realm of possibility, but I already care so little that it is an unlikely eventuality.Chairman Miaow said:No, it isn't. I could care less could be any amount of caring >0. You could care a great deal and care less, or you could care a tiny bit and care less. It's a saying that only tells us that you do care about something, but not how much you care.Ironic Pirate said:Except that "I could care less" still makes sense as a saying, just a different meaning. It's for when you have a tiny little bit of caring, but not much. For example, a tv show you watched a couple times and moderately enjoyed gets cancelled. You care very slightly. You could care less, but not much.lumenadducere said:This one, along with "I could care less," drive me insane. Why? Because they're not the actual sayings - they've somehow been twisted into what they are now, and what they are no makes no sense whatsoever.Mr. Underson said:"Same difference". Huh?
"Same difference" is a combination of "same thing" and "big difference." I have no idea what smacktard decided that it was a good idea to go around saying it, but I do know that I first began hearing it several years ago and had never heard it beforehand. Somebody started it, it spread like the plague, and that person needs to be backhanded.
"I could care less" also originally was "I couldn't care less" but likewise some monkey decided to remove the negative in the sentence and yet retained its current meaning. Everyone uses it to convey "I couldn't care less" but the statement itself doesn't actually say that. Whoever first said that should be smacked as well.