The worst way that somebody could misuse them is using them to track what students are doing on the school grounds. But, I think that's a moot point, because if a school was resorting to tracking all of their students, they probably have a legitimate reason for doing so, and if they really wanted to keep track of their students on the school grounds, there are other methods that they could use, like hall monitors. Schools use cameras instead because they're cheaper and require less people to use.Flames66 said:If they are not there, the opportunity to misuse them does not exist.ohnoitsabear said:Not necessarily. If a school is using them to know where every student is at every time, then you'd have an argument. However, if the cameras are there, but only looked at in case something serious happens (more serious than a few kids skipping class), then they do have value. For example, one year at my school, there were two bomb threats, and the school didn't have any security cameras, and they weren't able to figure out who did it either time. Had they had security cameras, they could have figured out who did it right away. So security cameras in schools actually do have legitimate value.
Now, this is a bit of a pre-emptive point, but please don't pull the privacy argument. A school is a public place, and in a public place, you have no right to privacy, at least in the sense of knowing where you are and what you're doing, which is all cameras would be able to know anyway.