Well, everyone's probably thinking its up to the kids so there's no mention of the parents. Which of course is rather dumb, since if gave kids the option, they'd just as well not go to school at all.Saucycardog said:You're much more observant than me. I actually missed that part.emeraldrafael said:ScarletRider said:So the kid has to voluntarily carry the tracking device<quote=Article>It's worth noting that while this anti-truancy program is very elaborate and almost invasive, it is also entirely optional. Students and their parents are offered the chance to voluntarily participate in the "monitoring as a way to avoid continuation school or prosecution with a potential stay in juvenile hall."Berethond said:It's optional.
On top of that, parents would also be avoiding the $2,000 fine that can come from turning a blind eye to truancy if a school district chooses to pursue the issue.
Bolded parts remove much of the "volunteer" aspect of it, At least I would think. If your parents have 2 grand just floating around each time you want to skip school then more power to you.
Grants mostly. If you're scores are low when you test the kids school wide the state doesnt fund the school so much after a certain point. No school funding means no abilities to buy things for the school. Which means your school eventually closes, you (as any faculty) lose your job, and its really hard to go to another school saying you couldnt keep your kids in class so they shut down your previous place of employment.Fr said:anc[is]How the hell do schools lose money when students are absent? And what's stopping these kids from just throwing those expensive GPSs into the trash? If kids are going to skip, they are going to skip, talking to a guidance counselor is just going to irritate most of the kids anyway
FOR THOSE WHO SAY THAT THIS ISNT OPTIONAL:spartan231490 said:This is an abomination. They call it optional, but if you don't say yes they threaten to fine you $2000 and put ur kid in Juvenile Hall. It's so incredibly wrong that they can get away with this. I am, once again, disgusted by society.
Sober Thal said:Kids should surrender their phones for GPS tracking as a mandatory precaution.
Keeping track of where you are is useful to prove your innocence.
Yes having an alibi is very useful. One problem with the GPS tracking of the phone to prove innocence.Nouw said:Mmhmm, having an alibi you can prove can be useful.
As T.V. and movies taught me >.>
Only if the parents are found to be "turning a blind eye" though. Having a delinquent child is probably recognized as being different than being negligent. And it requires special investigation, so it's not like you skip one class and are slapped with a $2,000 fine.XxRyanxX said:$2,000 fine?? What if the parents tried all they could to keep their child in school? That's not only unfair, but they wasted money on this rather then provide educational material like books, teachers, and more. This is tragic.. I mean seriously I thik kids ditching is the least of their worries.
So.... basically it doesn't work and its a waste of money?Plucky said:Of course, attendance rates dip a bit as soon as students stop participating in the monitoring program"
So basically, you're jealous of them? If they managed to pass the class then I'm fairly sure they studied. Staying in school should not equate with accomplishment. If they skip then they're not interessed in that particular class. Keeping them in class will not change their opinion about that class and even worse they might end up annoying other students.spartan1077 said:I personally love the idea. There are these kids at the school I go to who just skip every day and still pass. They are just wasting the money that is putting them through school. I say, we ether enforce it more and keep tabs on them, or kick them out and stop caring if they go anywhere since it's their decision.