Science Hopes "Invisibility Wetsuits" Might Deter Sharks

Recommended Videos

Earnest Cavalli

New member
Jun 19, 2008
5,352
0
0
Science Hopes "Invisibility Wetsuits" Might Deter Sharks



Having found that sharks are color-blind, Australian scientists have deployed two new wetsuits which they believe will keep the toothy beasts at bay.

Despite their fearsome reputation, sharks are like any other animal. They eat, swim and reproduce according to instinct, and have very little in the way of reasoning skills. This is a lucky break for us humans, as it allows science to create wetsuits that either render a person effectively invisible or actively frighten the shark into avoiding the wearer. Wetsuits like the newly-revealed "Elude" and "Diverter."

The Elude, as you'd expect, is the so-called "invisibility wetsuit." It relies on a camouflage pattern to hide a person among the waves. The Diverter, by contrast, utilizes bright white and dark blue stripes to send a message to sharks that this particular creature is, at best, unappetizing (and at worst, full of poison). "Many animals in biology are repelled by noxious animals - prey that provide a signal that somehow says 'Don't eat me' - and that has been manifest in a striped pattern," states Professor Shaun Collin of the University of Western Australia's Ocean Institute. "We are using a lot of nature's technology, based on high-contrast-based banding patterns. The wearer will be obvious, and the idea is the shark will see that as an unpalatable food item and swim right by."

These new suits are a joint effort between researchers at the University of Western Australia, and designers at Shark Attack Mitigation Systems. Western Australia has been a hotbed of shark activity of late - 5 fatal attacks have occurred in a recent 12-month span - and the team behind these suits hopes that they might save a few lives.

"The idea is to reduce the risk of the wearer in certain conditions," says Collin.

Testing of these suits is ongoing, but the team claims that both suits have already been successfully tested against notoriously aggressive tiger sharks. They weren't being worn by humans during that test, but the researchers remain confident.

"We now know what these big predatory sharks can see, and what we have done is convert that science into a marketable technology," says Hamish Jolly, a designer with Shark Attack Mitigation Systems. "We have converted that into patents that we know will hide [wearers] or present wearers as not shark food."

Source: Guardian [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/18/invisibility-suit-protect-shark-australia]


Permalink
 

Jadak

New member
Nov 4, 2008
2,136
0
0
Testing of these suits is ongoing, but the team claims that both suits have already been successfully tested against notoriously aggressive tiger sharks. They weren't being worn by humans during that test, but the researchers remain confident.
lol, was anything wearing them, at least? I wish them the best of luck with the project overall, but proving that a tiger shark has little interest in attacking/eating a non-occupied piece of rubber does not make a valid test.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
Well, there are but a few issues.

1. Sharks have four other ways of sensing you. Not only can they feel your movement in the water, smell your blood, and hear your splashes, but they can also sense the electric impulses of your muscles.
 

Ishigami

New member
Sep 1, 2011
830
0
0
With roundabout 100 shark attacks a year of which only 10 to 20 are usually fatal this is a fucking waste of time.
And you wish I was joking. If you google some of the amazingly bizarre death statistics you see some crazy stuff like 400 ? 600 people per year being killed in the US from falling out of their beds while sleeping...

Leave the sharks alone.
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
Ishigami said:
With roundabout 100 shark attacks a year of which only 10 to 20 are usually fatal this is a fucking waste of time.
And you wish I was joking. If you google some of the amazingly bizarre death statistics you see some crazy stuff like 400 ? 600 people per year being killed in the US from falling out of their beds while sleeping...

Leave the sharks alone.
One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic huh?

Saving a few people from death is still a big thing. Even so, there are other factors other than death like PTSD to consider. Stop being so apathetic.
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Jadak said:
but proving that a tiger shark has little interest in attacking/eating a non-occupied piece of rubber does not make a valid test.
It does partially prove the point, Tiger Sharks will attack and eat anything whether it's living or not. They're near legendary for turning up with stuff you'd never expect in them, like tins of paint, bits of cars, whole guns, road signs and so on.

If Tiger sharks don't even take an exploratory bite out of an object, it's a solid indicator you've made the object somehow undesirable to them, visually at least. It's hardly proof, but it's enough to progress your testing.

Having said that, given that sharks can also smell, hear, feel and sense the electrical field of living creatures, it's hard to see what difference being invisible makes to them.
 

Mossberg Shotty

New member
Jan 12, 2013
649
0
0
Ishigami said:
With roundabout 100 shark attacks a year of which only 10 to 20 are usually fatal this is a fucking waste of time.
And you wish I was joking. If you google some of the amazingly bizarre death statistics you see some crazy stuff like 400 ? 600 people per year being killed in the US from falling out of their beds while sleeping...

Leave the sharks alone.
Now we just need to make a suit that makes you invisible to... gravity. Seriously, that's why I sleep on a futon, it's less than a foot off the ground, and after reading this statistic, I can only question how many times it's saved my life. Anyways, good to know we're making progress in the war against sharks, even if they still have other means of sensing you.

Off topic though, I saw Sharknado last night. That shit was crazy.
 

Ishigami

New member
Sep 1, 2011
830
0
0
mad825 said:
One death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic huh?
Excuse me what do you mean?

mad825 said:
Saving a few people from death is still a big thing. Even so, there are other factors other than death like PTSD to consider. Stop being so apathetic.
The odds of being the victim of a deadly shark attack is what? 1 to 3 700 000? It is way more likely to be hit by lightning.
Not to mention you can lower the odds even further by a great deal by simply not swimming where man-eater live.
There you have the very best way to protect yourself.

Mossberg Shotty said:
Anyways, good to know we're making progress in the war against sharks


Looks like asymmetrical warfare to me...
 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Invisibility, you say? Ummm...you're better off making better cages for shark-infested waters. Or make something that's just bite-proof.
 

LordLundar

New member
Apr 6, 2004
962
0
0
Yeah I read this and think "so fthe four means that sharks can detect prey in the water (sight, pressure, smell, bioelectric) they choose the worst one to fight against." Sharks of all breeds have TERRIBLE eyesight in the water and is very insignificant in spotting prey. Odds are good if a shark detected you it wasn't because you were seen.
 

PunkRex

New member
Feb 19, 2010
2,533
0
0
I know im just some spak on the internet and these fellas are proberly some of the best in their fields but don't sharks sense via ectrical fields? Colours don't mean shit, proberly why they're colour blind, they didn't need it!
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
Now I'm no marine biologist, but I have seen Shark Week on the Discovery Channel a few times.

That said.......don't sharks hunt mainly by smell and not by sight? For that matter, can't they actually sense the electrical impulses running through their prey's nervous systems and that's another powerful sense they use over their actual sight?

Just saying I'm almost certain that eyesight isn't a shark's greatest hunting tool. Hell, the reason they attack surfers is because they think the surf board looks like a seal.
 

Mossberg Shotty

New member
Jan 12, 2013
649
0
0
Ishigami said:
Mossberg Shotty said:
Anyways, good to know we're making progress in the war against sharks


Looks like asymmetrical warfare to me...
I guess that's a failure to communicate on my part, I don't really harbor the belief that we're engaged in some kind of open conflict with sharks. If the rest of my post wasn't a good indicator, the whole statement should be taken with a massive grain of salt. To be fair, they haven't really been given a good shake, what with the fin/teeth harvesting, and the whole systematic genocide thing. That might be a bit of an exaggeration, but not too far off.

They aren't the most sympathetic creatures, but I don't think they deserve such a bad rap.

http://s23.postimg.org/q79p0g4gr/untitled213251.png

Except these guys. They can die in a fire.
 

TheCaptain

A Guy In A Hat
Feb 7, 2012
391
0
0
Hope they don't hunt by the smell or warmth of urine in the water. Of which there's be plenty if a fuckin' shark just "swam right by" me.
 

Kyoh

New member
Oct 12, 2010
72
0
0
Read the article folks. The suit doesn't make you undetectable by the sharks. It creates a false warning, implying that you are not good meat to eat, like poisonous fish.

Essentially, it makes you seem about as appetizing as glass shards in a vial of bloody semen.
 

idarkphoenixi

New member
May 2, 2011
1,492
0
0
Unless you colour the surfboards too, I can still imagine them mistaking those things for seals. For a shark looking up at a surfer, it's not going to see what kind of wetsuit that person has on.