@Fragrance: Exactly. Not a lot of people would post their notes like that but it really saved our hides this time. Good catch.
@Zero: And good that you posted it. No harm no foul in my book.
@CA: Yeah, I've had that thought too. But honestly, what else are they doing in the game? I mean, around these parts death is cheap. If I were in a position to narrow down the list I would rather take that risk and miss as opposed to just sitting around and voting.
I know we've been conditioned to think that dying is a bad thing but in this case it really isn't. A good arbiter would be one willing to make the sacrifice even without the guarantee of the win. As I see it, they're losing their normal weak votes for one extremely strong one.
This round I've been able to see that there really isn't a huge difference between playing the game and not playing it. Dying doesn't take any of the enjoyment out of the experience (well...at least for me anyways).
I doubt anyone will really agree with my stance on this but whatever. Maybe I should try and get the arbiter role sometime...
*schemes*