Serial Killer Round 68: - Cylon Invasion - Cycle 9 - Game Over! The Killer has Won!
- Thread starter Demagogue
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Honestly I don't think there's much to discuss. What happens now happens. There's absolutely no information and little chance of us ever getting anymore. I'm more upset by this round then when I got executed first round as the Lawyer. At least then I played and lost because I didn't play well enough. Here I just feel like we fell upon this situation. It's frustrating.Fat_Hippo said:
Can we throw the airlock out the airlock? I mean no-one is even discussing the chance of a sentient airlock being the cylon.Fat_Hippo said:
Well we do want people to vote together. If we don't that gives more power to the lawyer and killer since they will vote together if they're smart.gritch said:
If the Cylon is the airlock, I want to know how it kills so many people. Or is everyone just casually leaning on the airlock, expecting nothing to happen? Because if that's the case, this problem could be solved very easily with some kind "CAUTION: Do not lean on the airlock!" sign. What if there was no Cylon all along, and this is all just a case of poor workplace safety? I should sue. I mean, if I wasn't dead.Dr. Crawver said:
Scratch that, it's gritch I'm voting for.
Hmmm, I think I'm going to keep my eyes on the airlock from now on. In fact I'm going to put a "suspected cylon" sign over it. Can't risk anything else.Fat_Hippo said:
Well I'd say it needs to list the airlock, since that thing is clearly shifty to some degree. I'd also say I'm innocent because I'm a doctor dammit.Zeconte said:
Close, but not quite. A quack is an incompetent doctor. I'm not evil, I just have a high mortality rate because I can't hold scaples very well.Zeconte said:
Have to pay the bills somehow. And if all they need is some pills, then I'm your walrus. Just a little harder when someones appendix has burst or something.Zeconte said:
Found a little time. I would certainly not have expected CrimsonPheonix to be killed off. For one I had some suspicions of the guy and more importantly, it wasn't who I'd have attacked if I were the killer.
I also still suspect Armadox. Besides my earlier suspicions. Most of his arguments make very little sense to me. One explanation is that he is pretending to be a good guy by trying to formulate suspicions but isn't pretending well which is why his arguments seem off. Another explanion could be that he and I form our suspicions in very different ways for whatever reason which would be why his arguments make no sense to me. My gut tells me he sounds honest but my brain tells me something is wrong there.
I am also apparently used to different suspicion games than the rest of you. While our start has so far been awful, we still outnumber the baddies 3/1 to 4/1. I'm used to having very low powered good guys and 3-4 bad guys in a game of 20 players so this situation shouldn't be as dire as people are making it out to be. Of course if we all don't coordinate and vote anonymously and fractured whilst mostly joking around and not responding to eachothers accusations it is all very hard. I would have gone more in dept but I sadly don't have the time. I'm voting for Armadox and if you all have nobody better to vote for I request that you follow the vote of somebody (me or anyone else) who has already made up their mind. That way the baddies have less sway over who gets killed by popular vote.
Well, I don't find this a bad lead. Secondhand Revenant also said something about sending a PM about his role to him.altnameJag said:
I also still suspect Armadox. Besides my earlier suspicions. Most of his arguments make very little sense to me. One explanation is that he is pretending to be a good guy by trying to formulate suspicions but isn't pretending well which is why his arguments seem off. Another explanion could be that he and I form our suspicions in very different ways for whatever reason which would be why his arguments make no sense to me. My gut tells me he sounds honest but my brain tells me something is wrong there.
I am also apparently used to different suspicion games than the rest of you. While our start has so far been awful, we still outnumber the baddies 3/1 to 4/1. I'm used to having very low powered good guys and 3-4 bad guys in a game of 20 players so this situation shouldn't be as dire as people are making it out to be. Of course if we all don't coordinate and vote anonymously and fractured whilst mostly joking around and not responding to eachothers accusations it is all very hard. I would have gone more in dept but I sadly don't have the time. I'm voting for Armadox and if you all have nobody better to vote for I request that you follow the vote of somebody (me or anyone else) who has already made up their mind. That way the baddies have less sway over who gets killed by popular vote.