It's not splitting hairs at all. (I do mean the fact that it is a PC game.) Coca Cola does not make money off of TV sales, because in order to drink a can of Coke you don't need to buy a TV. In order to play Left for Dead, however, you do need to buy a PC-- so Microsoft makes money off of every Left for Dead sale, whereas Coke certainly does not make money off of every TV purchse. There's a world of difference there.chase211 said:First of all, Game for Windows in a marketing campaign by microsoft, Left4Dead is not a part of this, it has nothing to do with Game 4 windows, so I will assume you just mean the fact that it is a PC game, in that regard I have no comment because your splitting hairs to the extent that you could probably successfully argue that The Coca Cola company makes money off each individual TV sale because TV watchers drink coke...the mac gamer doesnt exist so yes, pc gaming occures on windows.KSarty said:But you don't need Games for Windows to play any games on your PC. Chances are you already have some form of Windows installed on your pc, so Microsoft is not making money when you buy a game for PC unless they published/developed it.ranger19 said:How did Microsoft NOT make money on Left 4 Dead? I don't mean in royalties per se, but I mean that if you want to play a game that is released only on the 360 or for Games for Windows, you're going to have to pay money to get yourself a Microsoft machine. Either you have one (and thus have already paid for one) or you're going to buy one. Either way, Microsoft makes money, if indirectly, off you buying the game.chase211 said:But thats not true, is the thing. Microsoft did not make money on, for example, Left for Dead on PC.ranger19 said:What I meant there is that if a game is released for PC, it's still released as a microsoft product, so it's still essentially 'exclusive' to Microsoft.
I agree with you in part then, it is technicaly considered an exclusive if the PC realese was AFTER the console realese, but not with reguard to same time realese.