Thank you Amnestic, you have saved me from rambling drunkenly and others from having to read said drunken rambles. Have a cookieAmnestic said:they said the same thing about the Death Star and Darth Vader.1. reapers are just more exciting
Then KotOR came along.
So first it'll suck because it's not the game, then it'll suck because it is? As usual, no pleasing some people. It can be centred around the timeline the games are set without dealing with Shepard at all. For instance, they could have the movie focused around Garrus and his team on Omega, never mentioning Shepard's gender or specific non-canon actions (i.e. Saren's still dead of course, so they can mention that, but they can skirt around the likes of the Rachni or the Krogan).2. It might be the story from the game
Unless it's set in a different time, as you pointed out it could be. A film doesn't have to cameo every character from the game anyway - as I said above, could be set around Garrus. Could be set around Wrex rebuilding the Krogan, but that'd canonise him living. Could be set around Tali dealing with the Migrant Fleet.3. They will cut things/characters that we love
Cutting characters from screen time won't necessarily hurt the film. Writing them in and using needless cameos will.
No comment. You're basing this on speculation. You've got no idea what budget they'll use. When you're asserting it will suck, it'd pay to have some backup to your points rather than "Oh, they might not give it a big enough budget." which would cripple most every film.4. Cheapness-
They could just have Mark Vanderloo do the body and Mark Meer do the voice - Vader style. And again, that's even assuming they put Shepard in the film.5. And starring as Commander Shepard, Shia Lebouf
They care about making money. Generally to do that you need to at least make a halfway decent film. This is the information age and games are a far, far different medium than how they were back when the MK or SF films were made.6. When has Hollywood ever cared?
Besides, I think with the likes of the recent Iron Man films, it's not unreasonable to say they might be able to do something good with nerddom for once.
I have no idea what you're on about. How would having male asari give it a PG-13 rating?7. Uh... Asari are interesting-
Think you're talking a load of old bollocks, mate.At the end of the day
thisDevilSShadoW said:I see as lot of concerned folks here and for good reason. I am a long time hardcore ME fan but i have to say this: i could care less about a ME movie being good or not. Seriously, sure there's a strong chance that it will not do the ME universe justice or that it won't stay true to the story but it really doesn't matter. People that never heard about mass effect will probably enjoy it as a summer blockbuster(i'm assuming that's what it will be) and the people that do know what's what in the ME universe shouldn't go berserk over it even if it does suck. Point is we, the ME fanbase, have our games and our books/comics. We should regard a movie as a nice little addition to the collection, not something that jeopardizes it's image. If anything, this might get people that where previously unaware of ME into its fascinating universe.
I think that it has a rich enough background to do well as an independent plot. I always did love all the science that they put into it. Or at least they explain everything with just one fictional scientific property. That's what I always thought was Mass Effect's unique feature. Not the hum-drum story or the choices but the background. It's based a little off of Contact, a little off of Ender's Game, and it's all awesome sci-fi.eggy32 said:I think it'll suck because it will take out Mass Effect's unique features. those being choices and interactivity in general. Going from a story that branched off in a million ways to a story with one branch will not go well.
All the wild speculation aside that statement there cracks me up.Aiden Rebirth said:At the end of the day I will have to let the final product stand on its own, and please I am so going to see this like 8 times anyway, and hope that the Movie is good. Don?t be surprised however if the movie falls through or it sucks because guess what I warned you all?
Oh you mean the guy that took Richard Mattison's masterpiece and turned it into another dumb post apocalyptic zombie movie.....yeah I can see he'll be sticking to the source material...nice!Aiden Rebirth said:Mark Protosevich, the writer of I am legend, and the Thor movie coming next year.
well its good to see we have readers who values other peoples opinions about something enough to accept them as truth, instead of formulating thoughts and ideas based on ones own experience. Cheers.theSovietConnection said:Thank you Amnestic, you have saved me from rambling drunkenly and others from having to read said drunken rambles. Have a cookie
OR, you know, maybe he shared a similar enough opinion to mine that I felt no need to post aside from agreeing with him?Aiden Rebirth said:well its good to see we have readers who values other peoples opinions about something enough to accept them as truth, instead of formulating thoughts and ideas based on ones own experience. Cheers.theSovietConnection said:Thank you Amnestic, you have saved me from rambling drunkenly and others from having to read said drunken rambles. Have a cookie
I totally agree. Hollywood are likely to aim their attention to the fan base's desires. It's their main income idea most likely.CrafterMan said:Haha this was the best counter argument I've seen to date.Amnestic said:they said the same thing about the Death Star and Darth Vader.1. reapers are just more exciting
Then KotOR came along.
So first it'll suck because it's not the game, then it'll suck because it is? As usual, no pleasing some people. It can be centred around the timeline the games are set without dealing with Shepard at all. For instance, they could have the movie focused around Garrus and his team on Omega, never mentioning Shepard's gender or specific non-canon actions (i.e. Saren's still dead of course, so they can mention that, but they can skirt around the likes of the Rachni or the Krogan).2. It might be the story from the game
Unless it's set in a different time, as you pointed out it could be. A film doesn't have to cameo every character from the game anyway - as I said above, could be set around Garrus. Could be set around Wrex rebuilding the Krogan, but that'd canonise him living. Could be set around Tali dealing with the Migrant Fleet.3. They will cut things/characters that we love
Cutting characters from screen time won't necessarily hurt the film. Writing them in and using needless cameos will.
No comment. You're basing this on speculation. You've got no idea what budget they'll use. When you're asserting it will suck, it'd pay to have some backup to your points rather than "Oh, they might not give it a big enough budget." which would cripple most every film.4. Cheapness-
They could just have Mark Vanderloo do the body and Mark Meer do the voice - Vader style. And again, that's even assuming they put Shepard in the film.5. And starring as Commander Shepard, Shia Lebouf
They care about making money. Generally to do that you need to at least make a halfway decent film. This is the information age and games are a far, far different medium than how they were back when the MK or SF films were made.6. When has Hollywood ever cared?
Besides, I think with the likes of the recent Iron Man films, it's not unreasonable to say they might be able to do something good with nerddom for once.
I have no idea what you're on about. How would having male asari give it a PG-13 rating?7. Uh... Asari are interesting-
Think you're talking a load of old bollocks, mate.At the end of the day
Good show!
He's right you know, you are speaking bollocks. I very much look forward to this movie, put your chin up boy!