I dunno, I actually thought my first time was a lot of fun because neither of us really *really* knew what we were doing. Kind of hilariously awkward, and I wouldn't of had it any other way.SonicWaffle said:You know what sex ed really needs? To be useful. Instead of naming body parts and giving a clinical description of how they interact, they should teach you stuff that you need to know; how to make a woman orgasm, how to take your clothes off without tripping over and making a fool of yourself, why certain positions are a really bad idea, and most importantly, how to talk to someone when you wake up next to them for the first time. If we learnt all this stuff at school, sex would be far less awkward and embarrassing.LostTimeLady said:So what do you think folks? What is the sex-ed like where you live or went to school? Do you think that children as young as five should be taught the facts of life? Will it actually improve awareness and lower the teenage pregnacy rate or have an adverse effect? Does it really matter what age it's taught? Is it really that important to be made compulsory on the cirriculum?
We probably shouldn't teach them that at 5, though. Wait until they hit puberty, and can put the knowledge
to good use.
Pretty much this.Tharwen said:I think it should be taught when they start to take an interest in sex, or just before. Otherwise, it will be a completely alien and unimaginable concept to them.
Thanks for that.LostTimeLady said:I've fixed the link. I hadn't left a space between the end of the website address and the end of the brackets. :-SEvil the White said:We were 10/11 when we first got taught about this stuff, and then had some more detailed explanations the following year.
Mind, the link is broken so I can't see how they're planning to change it.
Mine was awkward for me, though a little less than it would have ordinarily been because I was falling-over kinda drunk. The girl, it turned out, had already slept with about 50 people by that point, so I guess she knew what she was doing.Snork Maiden said:I dunno, I actually thought my first time was a lot of fun because neither of us really *really* knew what we were doing. Kind of hilariously awkward, and I wouldn't of had it any other way.SonicWaffle said:You know what sex ed really needs? To be useful. Instead of naming body parts and giving a clinical description of how they interact, they should teach you stuff that you need to know; how to make a woman orgasm, how to take your clothes off without tripping over and making a fool of yourself, why certain positions are a really bad idea, and most importantly, how to talk to someone when you wake up next to them for the first time. If we learnt all this stuff at school, sex would be far less awkward and embarrassing.LostTimeLady said:So what do you think folks? What is the sex-ed like where you live or went to school? Do you think that children as young as five should be taught the facts of life? Will it actually improve awareness and lower the teenage pregnacy rate or have an adverse effect? Does it really matter what age it's taught? Is it really that important to be made compulsory on the cirriculum?
We probably shouldn't teach them that at 5, though. Wait until they hit puberty, and can put the knowledge
to good use.
vaderaider said:What!? That's way too young. When I was five I didn't even know women had genitalia, I used to think that they peed out of their ass.
Actually, puberty can start alot earlier than that, I was barely 9 when it started, and spent the next couple of years wondering why I was so "interested" in nudity, genitals etc until we finally did a sex ed. class in school. Looking back I realise it would have been much better for me if some sort of earlier sex ed. had been done, even if it hadn't been that specific... (but 5 definitely is too young!)HuntrRose said:5 year olds? Are they insane?
Sex Ed is important. Getting the kids to think further than 5 minutes ahead even more so. Anyway, sexed should start around 11-12 years of age, when puberty starts for the earliest.
Ahh, I must say that does explain a lot. Especially since the midia has been quite quiet about what exactly they would be taught at age five.MysteriousClark said:My other half is a primary school teacher (who teaches six/seven year olds) and the scare stories the media are pumping out are not true. They touch upon sex education at that age in the sense of the differences between boys and girls and THAT IS ALL. They do not go into any more detail than that.
Please don't get caught up in all the righteous indignation on a story that is basically good copy for public outrage.