Lightknight said:
For a man that caters to a niche market and hasn't produced new games of "legend" status for almost two decades you'd think he'd mind his tongue.
I agree. But what do you mean by niche market?
Kids? Diehard Nintendo fans who are in their 20's/30's that buy everything they put out?
It's always fascinated me how certain fans, both Nintendo and otherwise tend to act. There's the "hardcore" gamers and the hardcore Nintendo fans. I've often heard Nintendo fans say that Ninty shouldn't cater to hardcore gamers because they're not worth it. Instead they should focus on the kids, which is a stable market.
I never really understood that. Hardcore gamer is a nebulous term, but among the many meanings that are often assigned to it, gaming enthusiast or hobbyist are usually among them. It seems to me that if a gamer is truly hardcore, then they would probably go out of their way to own multiple systems. Especially if there are enticing titles on those systems that make them worth buying. If Nintendo made another good Metroid game, that alone would make me consider picking up the console at one point or another. Does that make me a hardcore gamer? I own a 360, PS3, and will soon be acquiring a better gaming PC.
My point is, I just don't see how it's wise to write off so many people with such broad strokes. Same with the third parties and competition. There are tons of other people they could be trying to win over, and they don't even have to join the "next gen" race against Sony or Microsoft. It's just about the games and IP's. They could do it, but judging from this, they won't. Don't want to be "boring."