Colour-Scientist said:
A few years ago, they changed it recently, you needed a prescription here to get it. A friend of mine needed to take it when she was 16 and the person she was on the phone to noted that she'd already taken it once before and basically called her a slut until she hung up the phone. She ended up just risking it because she didn't want to go through that again. It was ridiculous.
They can refuse to sell it to you, but it's available without prescription. You're not talking about something that's changed.
Except now they're trying to pass conscience clauses that will protect a pharmacist's job for refusing to sell it. Except that goes even further, because they want to be able to not fill a doctor's prescription for bc/ec.
Rachel Maddow uses the Amish bus driver analogy for this:
But I digress.
Thing is, you can still walk into a pharmacy and ask for it. It's not truly OTC, but it is available for non-prescription purpose.
The other thing is, birth control and ec are serious business. Even progestin versions of the morning after pill can have deleterious effects on the body if used multiple times in a short period (no pun intended), even if progestin is safer than estrogen. I saw you make mention of your friend using it multiple times and possible OD effect previously, and the thing is, it really is still potentially dangerous, and not in just the "anything is dangerous if overdosed." It can screw with your body chemistry, your blood pressure and specifically your heart. Estrogen is worse.
This is why I really support the prescription model for birth control, though I don't support the "morality clause."
And hell, this is against my own interests. I'm a transsexual. I'd love to self-medicate and not have to worry about the morality of the doctors in this town. It's also not smart.