Should I get a 360 or a PS3?

Recommended Videos

Someone Depressing

New member
Jan 16, 2011
2,417
0
0
The XBOX has more of a Casual Gamer-Kinda thing going on for it. Therfore it has manly and tough games so casual gamers know what they'll expect. Gunfights and cover-based-shooting.

The PS3 ont he other hand is trying to reach fanbases from older/Core games.

With a Remake of Monkey Island, and Backwards compatability for older PS2 titles.

If neither of these suit you, fuck it. Wii's good enough.
 

Danceofmasks

New member
Jul 16, 2010
1,512
0
0
It's getting close to the end of this generation of console's lifespan.
Therefore, there are dozens of amazing games to play on each.

I'd say PS3, though .. 'cos it also doubles as a blu-ray player.
(Although, if you don't have a HDTV, it's a bit pointless)
 

nipsen

New member
Sep 20, 2008
521
0
0
Bah. You should buy an Amiga (and read my Speedball 2 review [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.270229-One-hit-wonder-Speedball-2-Brutal-Deluxe-for-Amiga-OCS] :p
 

sean360h

New member
Jun 2, 2010
207
0
0
I you want a media player get a ps3 a console a 360 i own a 360 and i can tell you that making a 360 play .avi or .mkv get ready for some work
 

Tjoubou

New member
Apr 14, 2009
71
0
0
A PS3, lot's o' great exclusives.
And now when there is Mass Effect 2 for PS3 there is no reason to only own a 360
 

V8 Ninja

New member
May 15, 2010
1,903
0
0
Gaming PC. [/pcelitism]

No, really, it depends on what you're looking for. If you're one of those people that heavily invests into the multiplayer mode of a game, I would recommend the Xbox 360. However, if you could care less about playing games with anonymous people, then I would recommend the PS3. The PS3 has a lot more variety of games and you get free internet compatibility.

On a whole, I would recommend the PS3, but it's all about whatever floats your boat.
 

Popadoo

New member
May 17, 2010
1,025
0
0
Well, if you like story, PS3.
If you like Multiplayer (And don't mind little kids making racist comments), 360.
 

wammnebu

New member
Sep 25, 2010
628
0
0
Arkley said:
Dear God. There's a ton of misinformation on this thread already and it isn't even on its second page yet (as of writing this). Why is it that no one can actually be impartial on this topic?

Okay, guys. I have a 360 and a PS3, and for christ's sake, they both have good aspects and flaws in measures so equal I literally couldn't pick a favourite if I had to. I don't think two machines have been so evenly matched since the Genesis/Mega Drive and SNES duked it out.

But, you know what? For the sake of people out there who genuinely want to know this sort of thing, I'm going to compare aspects of the two systems. The OP can read this and decide for himself. Plus, who knows? Maybe someone, somewhere, will have an epiphany and realise that neither console is drastically superior based simply on the fact that it's the console they own.

BluRay vs DVD:
The PS3 uses 25 gb single layer blu ray discs as standard. A handful of games (like FF XIII) come on 50gb dual-layered blu rays. The Xbox 360 uses dual-layered (8.5gb) DVDs. Both storage forms have their advantages. Much more content can be packed onto a single blu ray disc - negating the need for disc swapping - while DVDs can be read significantly faster. This leads to less discs (and occasionally extra content, as in Dead Space 2) for the PS3, and fewer/faster load times for the 360.

Game catalogue
When it comes to full retail releases, the PS3 generally has more quality exclusives, whereas the 360 tends to get the better versions of multi-platform games. The difference between most multi-plat games is usually indiscernible, and occasionally the PS3 gets the better version (as with FF XIII), but if you look at comparisons between the different console versions (available on many gaming websites), you'll usually find the 360 edges out the PS3 version with slightly superior graphics and faster load times.

Online services
This is an age-old argument. It's inarguable that Xbox Live is a superior service, but whether or not that service is worth the extra cost is purely subjective. XBLA has many more quality exclusives than PSN, but PSN has a large catalogue of the PS1 games we already know and love.
Xbox Live has more features, but they're almost universally Gold only, and the PS3 packs a web browser.

The winner here really depends on your level of online usage and consumption of DLC. If you're a big fan of online multiplayer, you'll probably find the extra cash for XBL Gold money well spent. If you only dabble in online play from time to time, you'll find PSN more than sufficient to meet your needs. If you like to play new, small-budget indie titles, you'll find more of them on XBLA. If you prefer to relive 32bit classics, PSN is the way to go. XBL gets a lot of timed exclusive DLC first, but they usually end up on PSN eventually.
XBL also has a tremendous amount of indie games in XBLI.

Controller
Again, largely subjective. It's all but inarguable that the 360's D-Pad blows and the PS3's triggers are inferior, but that's were reasonable comparison ends. Do you prefer a smaller and lighter controller, or something a little bigger with more weight? Do you prefer the positioning of the PS3's analogue sticks, or the 360's? It's worth noting that the 360 wireless controller requires either AA batteries or a play & charge kit.

Hardware & Additional Features
The old 360s crap out and die a lot. There's no arguing this. They also come without built-in wireless. Is it still worth bringing this up, though? The only point in comparing the consoles is to either make yourself feel better about the purchase you made - in which case you get to shut up - or to try to decide which console to purchase. Since the new 360s have been rolled out and they don't have either of those problems, and this thread is about which console the OP should purchase, the old 360's hardware troubles are a non-issue unless you're buying a pre-owned system.

As for additional features, this area is, again, purely subjective. I do feel the PS3 has the upper hand, with Blu Ray playback and the potential for 3D gaming edging out things like XBL's features and Avatars, but for someone who doesn't care about playing Blu Ray or has an SDTV, the 360 might be a better choice.

In Closing:

With the consoles so evenly matched, there are only two really important things you need to consider before making a choice. The first is: which exclusives do you prefer? Does Little Big Planet 2's level creator look like the best thing ever, or are you itching to get behind a gun in Halo: Reach?

But most importantly: Which system do most of your friends have? If your friends are all playing on PSN, you don't want to be the only one sitting on XBL looking at an empty friend list. Likewise, if your friends all have 360s, you'll find that while your PS3 will read Blu Rays, it certainly won't read any 360 games you borrow from your friends.
this man has said all that needs be said, the thread goes to him
 

baddude1337

Taffer
Jun 9, 2010
1,856
0
0
I personally have both, but I have had the 360 for 2 years longer than my PS3. My personal choice would have to be the 360, I basically got the PS3 with the mindset of the exclusive games and blu-ray. 360 seems to have the better version of multi platform, online is better (although you do have to pay) and it is much easier to get into a game or talk to your friends. I find its main problems are the less superior graphics (although this only matters on the exclusive titles) and that fact you pay for the online.
 

jpoon

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1,995
0
0
I've been more than happy with the PS3 after the hassle i've dealt with the other guy. Free online too, and it's really pretty damn good considering you're not paying. Top it off with an excellent bluray player, this should be an easy choice.
 

Kevin Biehler

New member
Apr 7, 2010
3
0
0
pc
you have to get steam on it though then it will be the best gaming experience btw thats what i did from wii to pc
 

Popido

New member
Oct 21, 2010
716
0
0
Arqus_Zed said:
Well... With that kind of mindset, I'd go for a PS2 if I were you o_O
..Thats not actually a bad idea.

If you're thinking of getting gaming PC at some point in the future, you can recycle the PS2's bios on to the PS2 emulation program for PC.
 

Medallish

New member
Jan 12, 2009
25
0
0
This is a rather hard question, to me it was the controller that made me go Xbox, and yeah the D-pad isn't great, but the ergonomics are great! MS generally have a good feel when it comes to building peripherals ergonomic(I also happen to own the MS Natural 4000 keyboard :p)

Another issue I've focused on is design wise the Xbox is more of a console, were the Ps3 is a HPC with a decent Graphics chip, there's a lot more effort put into designing the Graphics part of the Xbox as well as the CPU, this might sound strange considering the 8(1 core and 7 SPE's) core monster that is the PS3's CPU, but the idea behind the Xbox's 3 core, 6 Threaded Xenon is based on the most effecient design when it came to games, this is some wierd details to go into, but these are deciding factors to me, who puts more effort into it? The old Xbox's had bad HW, mainly because MS thought they had to rush to push it out and skipped important tests on the HW, and also didn't use the suggested cooling. This isn't all of them, and was mainly in the first revision, the later Jasper Revision isn't supposed to have any of these issues, and my guess is the Valhalla(the new black one) doesn't either, mine certainly don't.

I know it should be about the games, but I work on rewarding the one making the best effort and also certain other things, if you're into the whole shopping based on Moral or Ethics, a thing that might put you off Sony is a ongoing case they have with a guy called Geohot, (Google Sony Vs Geohot), MS isn't holy here either though.

Well this is long and wierd, I generally agree with everyone else, base your purchase on the games, And definitely what you're friends have, if you're like me and most of your friends play on PC, I suggest getting a game that will earn you some online buddies, like L4D.

Both systems seems to do the job though, so even if you feel you made the wrong choice you should still be able to get a lot of entertainment out of your system.
 

Porecomesis

New member
Jul 10, 2010
322
0
0
Arkley said:
Thank you. We finally have someone worth his salt.

I have a PS3, and not an Xbox 360. I don't plan on getting one, because I'd only ever get three games for it (Tales of Vesperia), Crackdown and Kameo). I could get Halo games for it, but I'm still not getting a 360.

It really depends on what games you want to play, because that's what a gaming console is. Do a bit of research on the games, and make your choice.
 

Coldster

New member
Oct 29, 2010
541
0
0
Get what most of your friends have (I assume you have some gamer friends yes?). This is the reason I got a 360 and I love it. It has the best multiplayer support and you DON'T have to pay for a gold membership unless you want to play certain multiplayer games like the Halo series. But if your more into single player games then I would suggest the PS3 because it graphics are a little better and their lineup of awesome single-player games is huge.

Hope this recommendation helped =)
 

beer_nuts

New member
Dec 27, 2010
28
0
0
flip a coin seriously...while they have different pros and cons...they match up very evenly.

i mean the only reason i bought a 360 over a ps3 is cos the controller of the ps3 is too small for me..i keep dropping it.

also whoever said there'll be a replacement for the 360 soon is talking rubbish...
it'll be 2 and a half years at least if not 3 before microsoft release another console.
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,851
0
0
funguy2121 said:
Okay escapists, I've finally tired of just owning a Wii. I've just started my medical career which will have me on call at least 7 days out of the month and Imma need some serious quality video games to fill my time with. I am hoping for backwards compatibility. I could care less about most of the Metal Gear games and, Zelda aside, I hate RPGs.

So I was thinking I'd either get a used system or a new one with a decent hard drive. I know that ever since Sony made the PS3 affordable they also snatched away backwards compatibility, so I'm leaning towards a used PS3 or else a 360, buuuttt...

What about the failure rate of the early models? It's not like I can warranty a used console, and both systems had a greater-than-50% failure rate for nearly a year.

So, what do you think?

I love the Splinter Cell games and anything with stealth, FPSs, retro games, I loved the Sands of Time games and I love games with 4-player split-screen support.

Thanks in advance.
Honestly the only real thing that you should worry about is what do your friends/people you play with have?

If most people you know play on Xbox live then get xbox if most people you know play PSN then get PS3.

Because both systems are good this is really all that should matter imo.
 

Eggsnham

New member
Apr 29, 2009
4,054
0
0
LewHammer said:
Definately 360 as it has better games but for the love of god buy a new one cos old ones WILL fail.
Welp, I'm going to try and hold back my fanboyism, but we'll see how that goes.

PS3 and Xbox 360 have almost the exact same game library, save for a few exclusives which aren't multi-platform.

You don't have to pay to play games online with PS3 (and there is NOT, and never will be, conclusive proof that PS3 users are "easymode", and I rarely have connection issues with my PS3).

PS3 has better looking graphics on average, although you need an HDTV to really notice any difference.

PS3 is more expensive by about fifty dollars, but like I said, you don't need to pay $50+ per year to be called a "noob ******" by a child who is likely three or more years younger than you.

The new 360's still fail (although a lot less than their predecessors). I've never heard of anybody I know who owns a PS3 experiencing a console killing issue.

PS3 comes with an internet browser, so if I really wanted to, I could use it like a makeshift desktop PC.

Really, the only thing I could think of that I don't love about my PS3, is the not as comfortable controller design.

So, it's really all about personal preference, but I would take a PS3 over an Xbox any day.