Plenty of people liked it. None of them were critics.Vault101 said:well I mean you always have to know what you do and dont likeBonsaiK said:A short list of things that got universally negative critical reviews when they first appeared:Vault101 said:I trust critics, if they ALL hate somthing its a good sign to stay away
Black Sabbath
Led Zeppelin
Frank Zappa
Elvis Presley
KISS
Blade Runner
Just saying.
But unlike film (which has some leeway) I think music is simply too subjective to be "critiqued" (anyone listen to music "critcs" anyway?) as in some people see all rap as an assult on the ears where as others see it as some of the best music ever, or a bands new sound album might be a peice of artistic gold where as a former die hard fan hates it because it changes what he/she loved about the band int he first place
as for blade runner....Im surprised actually, how did that film not remain in obscurity if no one liked it?
I actually just finished watching that for the first time. It was because the directors cut got released, and ryhperior to the theatrical cut and it was one of the first movies to do letterboxing, so it looked amazing on peoples tv's (at the time they would just show the middle, or do panning and scanning, so it looked awful)Vault101 said:as for blade runner....Im surprised actually, how did that film not remain in obscurity if no one liked it?
well by "no one" I guess I was refering to how it didnt really do well as far as "mainstream" went and its not hard to see whyBonsaiK said:Plenty of people liked it. None of them were critics.Vault101 said:well I mean you always have to know what you do and dont likeBonsaiK said:A short list of things that got universally negative critical reviews when they first appeared:Vault101 said:I trust critics, if they ALL hate somthing its a good sign to stay away
Black Sabbath
Led Zeppelin
Frank Zappa
Elvis Presley
KISS
Blade Runner
Just saying.
But unlike film (which has some leeway) I think music is simply too subjective to be "critiqued" (anyone listen to music "critcs" anyway?) as in some people see all rap as an assult on the ears where as others see it as some of the best music ever, or a bands new sound album might be a peice of artistic gold where as a former die hard fan hates it because it changes what he/she loved about the band int he first place
as for blade runner....Im surprised actually, how did that film not remain in obscurity if no one liked it?
A critic is just some person who is paid to write opinions for a publication. These people are great at assessing things which fit into existing cultural currents, because that's what they do. However, when something very fresh and new appears, they often fumble the ball because critics assess new things by looking backward to see how they compare to previous things. Hence Blade Runner was critically demolished for the lack of chemistry between the two leads, because that's a key element of how a sci-fi detective/love story would normally be assessed. They all wrote the film off as "great special effects and visual design, crap story". Not one critic of the time really got the whole relevance of the 'cyberpunk' thing. Of course, they all see it nowadays in retrospect, because today there are more cultural reference points. Likewise, not one critic liked Black Sabbath either because that sort of music simply didn't exist when they came out so the critics had nothing to compare it to. These days they all love Sabbath because it's so obvious that that's where every other metal band in the past 40 years has been getting riffs from.
I definitely agree with you there, I don't see how them imagining themselves a sexy strong women makes it sexist, hell, every male character bar one is a pig and misogynist in the film but no one calls foul on that, it's because that's how they're putting them in their mind, they're the ultimate enemy of their freedom both as women and in the literal sense, the people and critics that are saying it's sexist are the shallow ones, all they are seeing is skimpy costumes on sexually 'exploited' women, I believe the term they are looking for is empowered.Marter said:<url=http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/326.273103-Marter-to-the-Movies-Sucker-Punch>I believe that you should
And it's not really objectifying in my eyes. The girls are imagining themselves like that. It's actually quite an empowering film.
You should watch it, decide for your self. This movie is controversial and open to many opinions. You'll regret not having a first hand opinion.Vault101 said:how would you rate it on the whole "sexist/objectifying" scale? I mean I know they are all dressed skimpyly but that doesnt mean its "sexist"