Should "real" history be taught to younger students?

Recommended Videos

dragonburner

New member
Feb 21, 2009
475
0
0
SharPhoe said:
You know, maybe it's because they're only children, and either not capable of understanding touchier subjects like that, or would become very scared of the world at too young an age.
I agree with this guy. On an unrelated note, how 'bout them Red Sox?
 

stonethered

New member
Mar 3, 2009
610
0
0
Spaceman_Spiff said:
I get annoyed whenever the time period "the Dark Ages" is mentioned.
you mean the germanic feudal period? between the 300s AD and the first crusade in the 1100s AD. love that period. funny how the greek dark age is rarely mentioned.
i'll admit at first i thought this topic would be talking about the fact that sex is completly left out as a motivation for political actions.

lets see, japanese-american internment camps are not taught in order to frame the americans as 'the good guys' in WWII. any sort of womens rights, minority rights, and their respective artistic achievemnts are all added in an attempt to overturn the view of history as being about 'old white men', inspite of the fact that most of the major, non-scientific, achievements of history were actually made by middle-aged white men. that if we really want to show influential historical women, we have to teach a certain amount of sex history. and that if we want to talk about minorities we have to talk about how we, white people, persecuted even each other. or for that matter how the US was one of the last english speaking nations to abolish slavery, which is hardly a patriotic topic.

we should talk about how theoretical any history is, how religion had less of an influence on the crusades then most people believe, how instrumental christianity was in the abolishment of slavery(inspite of present views of a bigoted church), and of course how the winner writes the history book causing strong bias in any war. i feel really awful about whats happened to germany since WWII, they had a great national anthem and you can't even play it now.
 

Bigeyez

New member
Apr 26, 2009
1,135
0
0
It has less to do with teachers not wanting to teach it and more to do with

A) Not having enough time to go in depth and explain all these things correctly to children and

B) Children themselves not being able to understand a lot of the complicated concepts we learn later on.

So it's not really that we're lied to...it's just we're fed the basic of basics until we can delve deeper into the subject matter. Even then chances are you won't learn most things until college anyways. I know I never got past the second World War in my high school history classes and the only reason we even get that far is because we skip over tons of stuff, jumping from early civilizations, to greeks/romans, to the "dark" ages, to colonial America, etc, etc.

Edit: And it's certainly not some conspiracy or whatever bs some people in this thread are talking about.

stonethered said:
*snip
lets see, japanese-american internment camps are not taught in order to frame the americans as 'the good guys' in WWII.

how religion had less of an influence on the crusades then most people believe
*snip
You shouldn't go around making sweeping generalizations like that. Just because YOU weren't taught stuff by your teachers doesn't mean the entire country is in on some conspiracy to not teach these things. I learned about these two facts specifically in my 7th grade world history class, so yeah...
 

feather240

New member
Jul 16, 2009
1,921
0
0
Easy answer. Don't teach them about anything where you would have to make that choice at first, and than work your way up. Got it?
 

I Stomp on Kittens

Don't let go!
Nov 3, 2008
4,289
0
0
We go into more detail later on. Are they supposed to tell them that 'every single child and woman was raped'and say how 'Their privates were cut off and put in their mouth'? They won't get it and may be frightened
 

Spaceman_Spiff

New member
Apr 16, 2009
876
0
0
stonethered said:
Spaceman_Spiff said:
I get annoyed whenever the time period "the Dark Ages" is mentioned.
you mean the germanic feudal period? between the 300s AD and the first crusade in the 1100s AD. love that period. funny how the greek dark age is rarely mentioned.
i'll admit at first i thought this topic would be talking about the fact that sex is completly left out as a motivation for political actions.

lets see, japanese-american internment camps are not taught in order to frame the americans as 'the good guys' in WWII. any sort of womens rights, minority rights, and their respective artistic achievemnts are all added in an attempt to overturn the view of history as being about 'old white men', inspite of the fact that most of the major, non-scientific, achievements of history were actually made by middle-aged white men. that if we really want to show influential historical women, we have to teach a certain amount of sex history. and that if we want to talk about minorities we have to talk about how we, white people, persecuted even each other. or for that matter how the US was one of the last english speaking nations to abolish slavery, which is hardly a patriotic topic.

we should talk about how theoretical any history is, how religion had less of an influence on the crusades then most people believe, how instrumental christianity was in the abolishment of slavery(inspite of present views of a bigoted church), and of course how the winner writes the history book causing strong bias in any war. i feel really awful about whats happened to germany since WWII, they had a great national anthem and you can't even play it now.
It's only becuase it's refered to as the Dark Ages, as if the rest of the world became non existant when Rome "fell". I mean some of the largest leaps in medicine happened in the muslim and chinese civilisations but that is always left out in history classes in schools.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
YES!

It is ridiculous, completely, to sugar coat your own history. Let us face it, that is really what is happening here. After all people learn, for example, how bad the genocide inspired conditions where in Japanese and German internment camps at a young age. Clearly this alone shows we are not trying to 'protect the children' from disturbing history.

The things we are not teaching our young teens are things that will paint our own countries in 'negative ways.' We seem to want to teach our teens that they live in a good and noble place, and likely the 'only' good and noble place on earth. They don't want our teens to realise the truth, that every single country out there has a shameful past it must strive to over come. Much easier to give them some fairy tale about how they live in the only 'free and pure' nation on earth....

This of course leads to the inclination to view every other nation as 'less then human,' in case your wondering where those brain dead war supporters are coming from... now you know.

As an Australian I never learned about the stolen generation in school, not even classes dedicated Australian history. Hell we never even touched on Aboriginal beliefs, history or anything else that wasn't some violent clashing between the native and the immigrants. Maybe we would have less anti-aboriginal sentiments if we actually taught our kids about their ways at a earlier age.
 

CptPanda29

New member
Apr 8, 2009
112
0
0
When you're a child you have a very limited sence of scale. Nobody gives a damn about voting untill you know how the Government is effecting you, and for that you either need the news to bark it at you or an already active interest in party policy. However children would rather watch cartoons than a man in a suit talk facts for upwards of half an hour. Around 10 you can't imagine the implications of Genocide, let alone spell it. It's all about gradually building things up towards the bigger picture. Another Nazi example, everyone knew Hitler was a bad man and the Nazis were evil. But only much later can you bring in the more philosphical ideas such as the Nuremburg Trials, and they couldn't imagine the scale of 6,000,000 people being wiped out for thier choice of lifestyle.
 
Jul 11, 2008
543
0
0
more often i have found that history was poorly taught becuase the textbook was out of date and the information proven already top be inacurrate. The education system seems to not care about this setting and marking assignments without any real regard to PROVEN FACTS.
 

Styphax

New member
Jun 3, 2009
121
0
0
Good post. I think yes, kids should be taught the truth behind everything. However to expect them to comprehend it would be a difficult task. The best thing to do would be to balance it. If you're going to emphasize the evils, then the good needs to be emphasized as well. Personally I think they do this to create a sense of denial and lingering patriotism that always niggles at their brains whenever they question something. It happens to me, even when the facts point to me being right.
 

KingPiccolOwned

New member
Jan 12, 2009
1,039
0
0
Seldon2639 said:
Eh... It really depends on who gets to write what "real" history consists of. Remember, of course, that the bleeding-hearts on the other side of the debate over the awesomeness of American history are no more objectively right. To portray the internment of the Japanese as being in any way equivalent to the concentration camps (for instance) is just as manipulative of young minds as omitting it altogether.

Did the Muslim nations develop society, science, and culture, or were they simple placeholders of knowledge from the Greeks and Romans? Was the Renaissance European co-option of Moorish knowledge, or a rediscovery of writings from antiquity which the Moors had allowed to stagnate? Both conceptions are "true", based on subjective interpretation of objective facts.

Did colonization of North America bring technology and society to an otherwise wild and untamed part of the world? Or did we simply take land from an existing civilization? If we did take the land, was that a "bad" thing? Is it evil for a more powerful nation to take land from a weaker one? Is modern immigration equivalent to Europeans coming to America?

I have no problem with telling children the bare facts of what occurred, but that's largely impossible. No writer/historian (liberal, democrat, or independent) can write without injecting some measure of personal bias into it.

Side note: I read Jonathan Kozol, and I find him to be exceptionally biased and prejudiced in his reporting of facts. He begins with his conclusion, and then attempts to back-stop it with facts, rather than beginning with reality and forming a conclusion as a result. For instance, he accepts only one possible cause for the difference in test scores between suburban whites and urban blacks (that the urban schools suck), but that's bad science. There are so many confounding variables he ignores that I want to beat him over the head with a statistics textbook.
Sir Francis Bacon must be vomiting in his grave with fury.
 

Bigeyez

New member
Apr 26, 2009
1,135
0
0
Kron_the_mad said:
more often i have found that history was poorly taught becuase the textbook was out of date and the information proven already top be inacurrate. The education system seems to not care about this setting and marking assignments without any real regard to PROVEN FACTS.
You know to be fair textbooks, period, become out of date within a year. With most countries school budgets how they are getting up to date textbooks for all subjects every year is impossible; hence, we end up with 5 or 6 year old textbooks in schools that are terribly out of date, but unless budgets change it's not really the school systems fault.
 

stonethered

New member
Mar 3, 2009
610
0
0
Spaceman_Spiff said:
stonethered said:
Spaceman_Spiff said:
I get annoyed whenever the time period "the Dark Ages" is mentioned.
you mean the germanic feudal period? between the 300s AD and the first crusade in the 1100s AD. love that period. funny how the greek dark age is rarely mentioned.
i'll admit at first i thought this topic would be talking about the fact that sex is completly left out as a motivation for political actions.

lets see, japanese-american internment camps are not taught in order to frame the americans as 'the good guys' in WWII. any sort of womens rights, minority rights, and their respective artistic achievemnts are all added in an attempt to overturn the view of history as being about 'old white men', inspite of the fact that most of the major, non-scientific, achievements of history were actually made by middle-aged white men. that if we really want to show influential historical women, we have to teach a certain amount of sex history. and that if we want to talk about minorities we have to talk about how we, white people, persecuted even each other. or for that matter how the US was one of the last english speaking nations to abolish slavery, which is hardly a patriotic topic.

we should talk about how theoretical any history is, how religion had less of an influence on the crusades then most people believe, how instrumental christianity was in the abolishment of slavery(inspite of present views of a bigoted church), and of course how the winner writes the history book causing strong bias in any war. i feel really awful about whats happened to germany since WWII, they had a great national anthem and you can't even play it now.
It's only becuase it's refered to as the Dark Ages, as if the rest of the world became non existant when Rome "fell". I mean some of the largest leaps in medicine happened in the muslim and chinese civilisations but that is always left out in history classes in schools.
yea, chinese history is really neglected here in america. japan i have a limited understanding in just because i took an interest.
islamic history i know because i've pretty much written my college thesis on it. i believe the last textbook i read on the subject had three paragraphs leading up to the crusades.

since the escapist is primarily focused on video games i feel like it ought to be mentioned that age of empires 2 had one of the most historically acurate campaign series in the history of gaming, all heroes are real historical heroes, all cutscenes are historically accurate, and the main cheat code is an awesome looking though somewhat underpowered(in-game) car.
 

electric_warrior

New member
Oct 5, 2008
1,721
0
0
yes, yes you should. obviously don't go into gory details, e.g. how mengele butchered people and vivisected babies, but tell them the hard truth even if it's sad or upsetting because history can be sad and upsetting.
 

MaskedMori

New member
Aug 17, 2009
324
0
0
Monshroud said:
I think this is more of a matter of comprehension. We shouldn't expect a 6 or 7 year old to understand the political structure of Europe during the time Columbus decided to fail at finding his way to India. We shouldn't expect a 8 or 9 year old to understand the political commentary of a book like Animal Farm. At that age, children don't have the life knowledge to put the information in any perspective.
You don't have to be wise to comprehend politics, sure, you probably havn't been taught enough to understand it in a complex manor, but he's asking if we should withhold information to make history more 'cushey' for our children. I think that usually makes them insanely patriotic, which isn't good for creating an individualistic society.
 

Cakes

New member
Aug 26, 2009
1,036
0
0
It's not really about lying to them or sheltering them, they just wouldn't fucking understand these things.
 

Xvito

New member
Aug 16, 2008
2,114
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
Xvito said:
I take it you were born in both Germany and the United Kingdom then...?
Nope, I just taught myself after school. That's how I know how the other countries see it.
Phew! That's good to hear. For a minute there, I thought the Universe was going to collapse.

Edit: What with you being the Lord of Time...