I don't know. The thing here is that we do, deal with it.Should the UK have a Royal Family?
I don't know. The thing here is that we do, deal with it.Should the UK have a Royal Family?
The MPs do as much harm as good and they have legalised their own fraudulent behaviour, allowing them to claim on second houses etc.Yosharian said:Are you kidding? At least MPs do something for our country...27CDruid said:Considering the amount MPs are paid and their ridiculous bonuses (which were legalised after controversy activities), the Royal Family are not my first target for cuts.
Oliver cromwell's measures against Ireland have been characterised as genocidal or near- genocidal and he overthrew the english monarchy. and you want the royal family to fall?Ryan Kerr said:I'm Irish and I would love to see the "Royal Family" fall. I hate them so much.
today between them members of the royal family hold approximently 3000 patronages of charitable organisationsYosharian said:Are you kidding? At least MPs do something for our country...27CDruid said:Considering the amount MPs are paid and their ridiculous bonuses (which were legalised after controversy activities), the Royal Family are not my first target for cuts.
Yeah. He was being an ass so screw all the facts!SacremPyrobolum said:One person says one thing the other says the opposite. You will believe who you want to believe.Lusty said:Except you haven't. Every time I see that bloody video I really wish someone would post the response to it. So here it is:dex-dex said:Glad to know I have contributed to someone's gains in knowledge.Daystar Clarion said:I have learned something new today.dex-dex said:you will not be able to get rid of her easily.
And now I will regurgitate those facts as if they were my own!
[HEADING=2]Huzzah![/HEADING]
And the financials aren't the point anyway! I would much rather sacrifice the money they [don't actually] make and live in a proper democracy with an elected house of Lords, separation of church and state, no more Lords Templar etc etc etc.
One person says one thing, the other person says another. Which is right, we will never know...
The tourism thing is nonsense as well. If we turfed the Royals out of Buckingham Palace and Windsor, and opened up the stunning royal collections of art that for some reason no one is allowed to see, we'd make a fortune.
Happily I think it won't take too many years of King Charles to convince everyone to get rid of them.
The guy in the second video was being unsporting and making an ass of himself so I'll go with the first video.
you like fact's lusty here are some facts just because two people can make and put two videos on youtube dose not mean either is telling the truth or knows what there talking about.Lusty said:Yeah. He was being an ass so screw all the facts!SacremPyrobolum said:One person says one thing the other says the opposite. You will believe who you want to believe.Lusty said:Except you haven't. Every time I see that bloody video I really wish someone would post the response to it. So here it is:dex-dex said:Glad to know I have contributed to someone's gains in knowledge.Daystar Clarion said:I have learned something new today.dex-dex said:you will not be able to get rid of her easily.
And now I will regurgitate those facts as if they were my own!
[HEADING=2]Huzzah![/HEADING]
And the financials aren't the point anyway! I would much rather sacrifice the money they [don't actually] make and live in a proper democracy with an elected house of Lords, separation of church and state, no more Lords Templar etc etc etc.
One person says one thing, the other person says another. Which is right, we will never know...
The tourism thing is nonsense as well. If we turfed the Royals out of Buckingham Palace and Windsor, and opened up the stunning royal collections of art that for some reason no one is allowed to see, we'd make a fortune.
Happily I think it won't take too many years of King Charles to convince everyone to get rid of them.
The guy in the second video was being unsporting and making an ass of himself so I'll go with the first video.
You really think our government knows ANYthing about money?Lukeje said:If the Royals bring in so much tourist money then why does the government need to fund them through taxpayer's money?
Bravo. Anyone on this thread who has not watched this should do so before commenting.dex-dex said:you will not be able to get rid of her easily.
No, I meant the part where everything they own are originally stolen from the British people through lies, brute force and the clever use of hedges.Thanatus1992 said:The second video whines about lack of taxes, but doesn't say what would happen if we start taxing them. The royals would probably dissolve the agreement, leaving us with significantly less money than we get from them now.Mullahgrrl said:Didnt you watch the other video? those numbers are bogus.
Also, they're immune from inheritance tax because they don't own much of what people think they do. What gets transferred from monarch to monarch tends to belong to the country but is cared for by the Royals.