How about you don't decide whether to support it or not until you've seen some gameplay? Sound logical?
...GethBall said:oh god.... Is it just me or does this make the game look even worse?Norrdicus said:We should support Black Ops 2... because Kim Kardashian does!
![]()
Celebrity? HA!Korten12 said:...GethBall said:oh god.... Is it just me or does this make the game look even worse?Norrdicus said:We should support Black Ops 2... because Kim Kardashian does!
![]()
Really?
REALLY?
Some celebirty says a game looks good (though I will be the first to admit the graphics don't look impressive at all) and it makes it look bad?
Really?
Celebrity =/= good or smart. She is dumb as a rock and makes a shit load stupid decisions like its her primary function (though I will also admit the only thing I know about her is that whole marriage scandal thing) but with how America is, she counts as a celebrity.GethBall said:Celebrity? HA!Korten12 said:...GethBall said:oh god.... Is it just me or does this make the game look even worse?Norrdicus said:We should support Black Ops 2... because Kim Kardashian does!
![]()
Really?
REALLY?
Some celebirty says a game looks good (though I will be the first to admit the graphics don't look impressive at all) and it makes it look bad?
Really?
Many laughs were had.
I'll believe it when I see it. Most RPGs can't do choice and consequence properly, let alone a studio that's been making scripted shooters for yonks (and not even very good ones at that).Korten12 said:Because they're actually changing how the foundation of the Single-player works by adding choice and consequence where there is none. Picking between various missions to go on and based on fail or win change things. Also multiple endings.Woodsey said:It's been through several time periods already. It's gotten more and more restrictive as time has gone on. Why is this indicative of innovation?
Barely any FPSs have this, hell I don't think any recent one's do.
I actually just started to follow these games when Modern Warfare 1 came out. Before that, the COD 1, 2 and 3 always seemed like Medal of Honor clones to me and after that Medal of Honor became a clone of COD....oh the irony...it never stops...shrekfan246 said:It's Activision, not EA. An understandable mistake, since EA does the same thing with every single one of their sports franchises as well as Battlefield.Chairman Miaow said:Buy Blops2:
EA guys: "They love it when we release the same game every year, let's do it with all our franchises!"
Don't buy Blops2:
EA guys: "They hate it when we change things, let's keep making the same game every year!"
Yeah, either way, lose-lose. CoD will do fine though.
Also...
You haven't actually been following CoD very much, have you? Here:The Floating Nose said:Snip
2005 - Call of Duty 2
2006 - Call of Duty 3
2007 - Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
2008 - Call of Duty: World at War
2009 - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
2010 - Call of Duty: Black Ops
2011 - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Probably 2012 - Call of Duty: Black Ops 2
Treyarch has no affiliation with the Modern Warfare name other than it being in the Call of Duty franchise (and I think a part in the Wii port of 3, but who cares about that).
OT: Eh. I've not bought a Call of Duty title ever, and I can't really see that this will be the first one, unless they really decide to shake up the formula.
I didn't.Hazy992 said:Remember how everyone complained that Modern Warfare 3 was more of the same and that they weren't going to buy it?
You're one person, that doesn't disprove anything.xDarc said:I didn't.Hazy992 said:Remember how everyone complained that Modern Warfare 3 was more of the same and that they weren't going to buy it?
I could explain it to you but google exists.Mr.Tea said:What the fuck is this word?whinge