Vault101 said:
as far as I can gather christians "took over" what christmas (or its equivalnt) waaaay back in the day, just as comercialism/santa has taken over it now
but in the end it doesnt matter....christians are going to celebrate christmas their way...secular people celebrate it their way as well
but you cant still "claim" a holiday if pretty much ALL the western world celebrates it (unless they have another specific religion)....thats somthing you cant stop/undo
and its not like secular people go to the chrstmas mass or anything, like I said they see the family, exchange presants and get pissed
Christians did not take over Christmas, give me sources on this. If I'm coming across as grouchy it's because I have a pain in the ass headache lol.
But no, the Christmas that is mostly celebrated now is a corporate thing and probably what was stolen from Pagan celebrations if we're talking about that.
Also yes Secular people do go to Christmas Mass, Catholics in particular are most nobtable for doing so. That's a pretty sweeping statement that you just brushed over every religious group right there.
As for the claiming, sure you can as to not allow it is completely double standard.
Look at the previous examples, if we turned Diwali into a night where corporations wanted to sell fireworks or hell even light fixtures. Do you think Hindu's would suddenly accept this loss of value?
Why should any other religious group accept it or is this just bashing on Christians for having the balls to say so?
Everyone will celebrate the holiday all the same, but they have every right to make their claim to it.
Zachary Amaranth said:
What I'm getting from this is "it's alright for Christians to complain that someone has co-opted their holiday to make it about something else, but if you say the holiday they co-opted from others is not theirs, READ A BOOK!"
Come now, it reads as a double standard.
What you're getting from it is what you're inferring.
I never made any claim it was ok for
any group to steal others holidays.
However what you're getting at is how historians think Christmas was originally observed on the Solistice and is infact calling the Sun the lord, right?
That's fine and dandy but the gift giving was in the bible, Baby JC was given three gifts by the wise men who visted him at birth. The "Pagan elements" of the festival was just converting peoples beliefs that it wasn't the sun and was in fact JC/God.
When Christians "stole" Christmas they were just snubbing out Paganism itself but that was probably around the time Christianity was arriving in the West.
SenseOfTumour said:
I'd have to take issue here, as at least in the UK, it's seen that non christians are out to destroy and bury the whole idea of xmas. Yet wherever you are , it seems that they're trying to do their own thing during Christmas and generally let Christians do what they want? If it's just that they're using the word Christmas, words change their meaning over time, and Christmas really does mean 'that time of year around the second half of december, generally considered a holiday period.'
I agree that it's pretty crappy that it's so much about the money now, but I don't think there's any harm in letting other people celebrate Christmas, I think if non Christians had to have a seperate 'Winterval' at the same time, Christmas would be a far smaller event. I'd suggest, that if anything, sharing the word may mean that young people want to find out about the Christian side of it.
I'm in the UK, you can just click my profile.
I was with you right up until you said "words change their meaning", utter none sense. Christmas doesn't mean "that time of year around the second half of December" and frankly it's a poor argument to even bring up.
Christmas hasn't changed at all, it's still the same spiritual holiday it was for Christians but the none religious folks are just latching onto the commercialism pushed out by companies and now it's accepted that on the 25th of December, Presents!
I'm just here because the OP said Christmas wasn't a Christian holiday and I thought the notion hilarious.
Also side point; I'm atheist, I just prefer to tolerate everyones right to their own beliefs. Personally I think it's wrong that Christmas was ever associated with corporate greed like this.
Yes, I do give gifts out to people and I do recieve them myself, I don't observe any religious aspect of the Holiday. Good cheer is all well and good and it's an idea I can totally get behind, but I am very aware that there is a religious group who have been bastardized for it.