I see no problem with this. I wasn't even aware that the marriage option existed in Skyrim at all.
Seconded.Skullkid4187 said:My thoughts exactly.Custard_Angel said:I'm just annoyed that Bethesda considered this a worthy feature to include in a medieval type fantasy adventure game.
I agree with not wanting to make the gay NPCs massive stereotypes, but I'm not so sure about it never coming up. Prejudices make fake worlds seem more real. I'm not suggesting some kind of Skyrim KKK or the townspeople chasing a gay protagonist out of town with pitchforks, just that I think it'd add a lot of depth if, I dunno, all the shopkeepers in a town don't much like to deal with Harbargle theRidgemo said:The only thought i have on this is that it's annoying this is even considered news. I mean, it hardly matters (would just like to say, this is not aimed at you, more at sites like Kotaku that feel the need to report this).
I'll be honest, i'm not a big fan of homosexuals, i don't mind them but i have no intrest in what they get up to. For a game to handle homosexuality correctly, it should not even come up if you play it as a hetrosexual. Likewise, if you would like to play as a homosexual, there should be no reprecussions, or indeed any prejudice against it.
On the subject of another game (Mass Effect 3), i'm slightly worried that Shepard has all of a sudden decided he likes abit of bratwurst. It just seems so out of character for a character that hasn't shown any homosexual tendacies to this point (unless you count blue alien's as lesbians of course).
But that's a topic for another thread.
Basically, just make sure it's natural, rather than having overly flamboyant boys prancing around like twats.
It's an Elder Scrolls Game, the entire point of them is to play however you want, as any character. They've never been just about being a hero who fights the big bad (I think I've only done that once in both morrowind and oblivion out of countless characters made).Skullkid4187 said:Why should sexuality even matter in a game in the first place? Especially when the particular has you fight dragons, storm dungeons, stop a civil war....and be a hero???
It will unravel the moral fabric of Skyrim....Or something.xXxJessicaxXx said:I'd say to anyone upset by this Whats the problem?
I think the Vampires and Necromancers already took all the moral fabric and made smart but casual attire out of it.Zachary Amaranth said:It will unravel the moral fabric of Skyrim....Or something.xXxJessicaxXx said:I'd say to anyone upset by this Whats the problem?
Remember, the people who are most likely to get offended by this are also the ones who spend their time policing others' morals.
Bah. Vampires and necromancers are nothing compared to the threat of homosexuality!!!!xXxJessicaxXx said:I think the Vampires and Necromancers already took all the moral fabric and made smart but casual attire out of it.
Just sayin![]()
We should ask them which would they prefer to be locked in a room with.Zachary Amaranth said:Bah. Vampires and necromancers are nothing compared to the threat of homosexuality!!!!xXxJessicaxXx said:I think the Vampires and Necromancers already took all the moral fabric and made smart but casual attire out of it.
Just sayin![]()
...Or something.
Plus, vampires are now allegory for Mormon Supermen.
Anyway, joking aside, I've never noticed other impropriety get in the way of a good rant about homosexuality.
Well, "good" is a loose term.
chaosyoshimage said:POKEMON OBSESSIONS ARE NEVER STUPIDdarron13 said:I have a PS2, but it's at my mom's and I hate to lug it back and forth. But, I still want to get Persona 4 for it if I find it. It's kind of costly for a PS2 game. I know, Persona 3 Portable eludes me as well, I bought Persona 1 instead since it was $10 less and I needed the money to put towards something else. Stupid, Pokemon obsession...chaosyoshimage said:*Points to Persona 3 Portable*darron13 said:Stop reminding me that I don't have Persona 4, I only have the first one and found it hard to get into. Atlus, make a portable version of your apparent magnum opus and I will buy it.chaosyoshimage said:Yeah, I hate it when they do that. It really makes it feel like they just put it in there for the option, when instead they could use it for good character development. Developers usually throw it in but then just leave it there, so much so that characters never even comment on it. While yeah, on one hand they're trying to say "oh, its a perfectly accepting society" on the other hand it also says they don't want to get their hands into the social issue of it. To this date Persona 4 is the only one that I've seen that really did that.darron13 said:I wish New Vegas would have let me pursue a relationship with Arcade Gannon...NinjaDuckie said:Agreed. I'm gay too and I actually have more straight male friends than gay friends if only because I can't stand the flaming.Ridgemo said:Basically, just make sure it's natural, rather than having overly flamboyant boys prancing around like twats.
...that and most gay guys don't play videogames or watch anime and the such.
So its not to say they don't exist, but by only showing the flaming stereotype suddenly everyone will assume ALL gay people are like that...i.e. walking dick jokes with a limp wrist.
*sigh*
Persona 4 and Fallout New Vegas are probably the only games that looked at it more realistically that come to mind.
Of course, this game will most likely go the route of Dragon Age II and just make everyone bi or pansexual, but I'll take what I can get, especially if that means that gay character won't mean annoying stereotype...
Not as good as 4, but similar and still amazing.
Also the newer Personas are FAR easier to get into that 1, they're less archaic.
And come now, a PS2 is like $60 nowadays NEW xD
*ahem*
Yes, it IS kind of expensive, but it came out (fairly) recent-ish and well, its a good 60 hours long. So worth the price personally :/
I think P3P is like $30 on the PSN though.
ehh... You just reminded me of that orc blacksmith in the Shivering Isles. "That's a big chest you've got there... you mind if I help you get this thing on?"Wayneguard said:Just so long as I'm not constantly being hit on by burly orcs and nords in the street...
I don't have any strong opinion on the matter. I am, however, sick of people like this who expect people to sift through forums like they do all day, just in case someone posted it previously. It's not so much this instance I cant stand, because the topic really doesnt matter, my bitterness stems from doing google searches for a problem I am having and every single post is the exact problem I'm looking for, but a bunch of "Vergials" saying "OMG its already been posted, L2Search" without providing the answer or link. Especially after finding the so called original post of the issue (like having multiple sources of info is the bane of the internet) and it's 404'd or something to the effect. /endrantVergial said:My only gripe thus far is the lack of use of a search function. This thread already exists under a different name, conveniently linked at the bottom of page 1.
This SHOULDN'T be news. Yes, it has gay marriage as an option. Most people don't go ape when they learn Anti-aliasing is an option, so why all the fuss about this?
Can we please move on to things that actually matter now?
Sidenote: Nothing against you, OP, really. Only advice I have for you is to use the search function before posting.![]()
he didn't stereotype. he said he's hoping that bethesda doesn't stereotype.retyopy said:It should barely be news. What is news is your awful stereotyping. Really?