Your rant was entirely useless, being based on something I don't actually do: sifting through forums all day just to say 'learn to search'.Draitheryn said:I don't have any strong opinion on the matter. I am, however, sick of people like this who expect people to sift through forums like they do all day, just in case someone posted it previously. It's not so much this instance I cant stand, because the topic really doesnt matter, my bitterness stems from doing google searches for a problem I am having and every single post is the exact problem I'm looking for, but a bunch of "Vergials" saying "OMG its already been posted, L2Search" without providing the answer or link. Especially after finding the so called original post of the issue (like having multiple sources of info is the bane of the internet) and it's 404'd or something to the effect. /endrantVergial said:My only gripe thus far is the lack of use of a search function. This thread already exists under a different name, conveniently linked at the bottom of page 1.
This SHOULDN'T be news. Yes, it has gay marriage as an option. Most people don't go ape when they learn Anti-aliasing is an option, so why all the fuss about this?
Can we please move on to things that actually matter now?
Sidenote: Nothing against you, OP, really. Only advice I have for you is to use the search function before posting.
The post was linked. Bottom of page one. On top of that, the ticker on the right had that particular post at the top every time I went to watch a new video.
You need to check sources before whining about something that didn't happen.
If you'd have been whining like a petulant child about my single line, that'd be fine. However, you attribute traits to me that simply don't exist, making your rant little more than a moot point.
If you REALLY desire that link, you can go to where I mentioned it was. If you're too bloody lazy to click twice, then you don't DESERVE a link.
