You'll have to forgive me as I've not played ME3 yet (I give no shit for spoilers though). But from what I understand you get a bad outcome.Caramel Frappe said:Skyrim's ending was disappointing of course but... Mass Effect 3'd ending was the worst I had even experienced in all my gaming history. Let me tell you why in my opinion- Mass Effect's ending is much worse since i've played and beaten both games:Soopy said:Snip
- Mass Effect had three games total which is really one long story.
- You worked so hard, doing all those missions and side missions including getting your war asset to over 5,000 in ME3 which isn't required but the highest you need for a grand fleet to aid you.
- Throughout all three games, you really developed a bond and friendship with every crew mate and got attached to the series. You actually care about these characters.
Everything you've done.... ... is tossed out the window. Everything, you did, was for nothing. The ending screws Shepard over, has more plot holes then a vortex could swallow, and worst of all does not even give us a closure. Nope, it just ... ugh. Horrible, horrible ending.
Only issue in Skyrim's ending was the boss fight. Yeah it could of been improved but everything else in Skyrim makes up for the ending. In Mass Effect 3 though... all we worked for comes down to a big middle finger to the face, which drives into the face so hard blood is spurting out. Sorry for the graphic imagery i've given you but yeah that's how I felt. Not as upset now but the way Mass Effect ended made me feel such pain and some despair even.
Does a bad outcome mean bad ending? (If you follow).
As for plot holes/inconsistencies.
Skyrims has a massive one too, the whole point behind the Dovakhin. He can absorb the souls of the Dragons. That's why he's the only one who can kill them properly. Yet he does absorb Alduin. So Alduin isn't dead. WTF was the point?