Completely agree with this. Unfortunate that people have to put a damper on their freedoms to protect themselves but that's how it is. Alternately if you're going to dress "provocatively" you should damn sure be carrying every personal protector it's legal to have in your purse (mace etc.). Although I don't think the protest is really doing that much for them, I think they're missing the forest for the trees, essentially flipping out over some guy's provocative comment on the subject when in reality they seem to overlook that in most rape cases, "She led me on/provoked me/dressed provocatively" is a flimsy excuse and that oftentimes the girl was dressing and acting in a reasonable and appropriate manner. Either way the guy's not going to be able to excuse what he did whether she was wearing jeans and a t shirt or short shorts and a bikini top, so the whole issue seems almost immaterial to me.Baby Tea said:Looks like they've missed the point too.sethzard said:I think you've totally missed the point of the article, I support them on this. They should be able to choose how they dress without the worry of being raped.
There was a thread on a similar topic recently, so I'll just re-post what I put there for my thoughts on the topic:
A guy is walking through a rough neighbourhood waving a wad of cash around, and he gets mugged.
Now, obviously the one who mugged the guy is in the wrong 100%. That was illegal, and he should be punished.
And the guy should have the right to wave around money as much as he wants without fear of being attacked and robbed. But it's a naive and dangerous game to play. Ideally, I should be able to leave my doors unlocked, my keys in my car, and my money on my counter. But it's asking for trouble if I do any of those things.
Again, not my fault if someone robs me. I have the right to leave my door unlocked, my money out, and my keys in my car. But, at the risk of sounding redundant, it's dangerously naive to do any of those things.
The other thing that really takes all the seriousness out of this protest is that people still honestly believe they can "reappropriate/reclaim" any word that was pretty much invented to be harmful or negative. Plenty of African American cultural subgroups use the N-word as a colloquialism but that doesn't mean they've reclaimed it, at best they've created an alternate use for it. Any racist can still use that word to do damage with a simple change of intent, and anyone can call someone a slut and have it be hurtful if they intend it to be. "Slut" is never going to have positive connotations, just like "queer" won't as long as it continues to come out of the mouths of homophobes. Felt kind of irked by that whole side of the protest.