So, 2 people got fired at my work today

Recommended Videos

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Mekado said:
Strazdas said:
december is not special in any way. if he was going to fire them he fired them, christmas has nothing to do with it.
I suppose not, i just find that a little cold.

Guess it's a good thing i don't own a business hehe...
firing a hard working guy is cold regardless of season. just because you have a personal celebration (christmas) that it seems to be marketed way too much does not mean everyone should magically abide by stupid traditions.
 

Dimitriov

The end is nigh.
May 24, 2010
1,215
0
0
Does it seem heartless? Maybe.

But!



It was in a Monty Python skit... it must be true! D:
 

Andy of Comix Inc

New member
Apr 2, 2010
2,234
0
0
I feel like, without knowing the whole of the information that informed the decision, it would be hard to make a snap-judgement about it. Maybe that's a little heartless, but I think its probably correct to assume there's more to it than we know right now. Maybe he was stealing pencils. And got fired cos otherwise he'd steal more pencils. ...we don't know. Well, maybe you do. But I don't think you

Also:

PLEASE DO NOT ENGAGE THE CAPTCHA IN CONVERSION
 

Killclaw Kilrathi

Crocuta Crocuta
Dec 28, 2010
263
0
0
Nerexor said:
and they were the ones who did the least work and were assholes to everyone else
Full time workers can be the absolute bane to temps. One practice I find infuriating is when they pull temps off of their assigned tasks to help them with some trivial matter they could have done themselves, you either help them and get in trouble for not meeting your own quotas or you refuse and get in trouble for not being a "team player".
 

Doclector

New member
Aug 22, 2009
5,010
0
0
He was a complete fucking bastard to fire the second guy. Seriously, I don't know how you all witnessed that and managed to resist the urge to tear the asshole's limbs off one by one. Better people than me, I suppose.

And the first guy...he's still a bit of a dick. This is just the kind of shit you don't do. Hell, it's been going on for that long, why couldn't the first guy have been fired earlier? Give him a chance to find another job before the festive season?

People can say what they want about business being business and it being nothing personal, but look at the situation we're in globally. This is what that approach of never thinking of your employees and your customers as people gets us. These heartless bastards have had their turn in control, and fucked it up royally. Time for people to start taking some responsibility, or face being forced to.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
That Hyena Bloke said:
Nerexor said:
and they were the ones who did the least work and were assholes to everyone else
Full time workers can be the absolute bane to temps. One practice I find infuriating is when they pull temps off of their assigned tasks to help them with some trivial matter they could have done themselves, you either help them and get in trouble for not meeting your own quotas or you refuse and get in trouble for not being a "team player".
or help them and get your own quotas and the guy at the top notices you. cha :D
 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,665
0
0
Strazdas said:
december is not special in any way. if he was going to fire them he fired them, christmas has nothing to do with it.
Then again, Christmas is sort of a hard time to go looking for a job. Not that it can't be done, but many people take days off. You, know, like people looking at CVs, doing interviews, making decisions who to hire and so on. And the kicker is, that it's likely they get different days off, so it takes even longer to process an applicant.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
Mekado said:
The reason we got was "This dept is losing money, we need to cut the spending on it." And since the hardware and all is already bought and paid for, the only significant cut he could make was cutting salaries/employees.
Which is a risky maneuver. Cut the staff too much, you end up with people who are overworked, overstessed, thus the quality of work and customer satisfaction take a hit, and that usually means even less money coming in...
 

fix-the-spade

New member
Feb 25, 2008
8,639
0
0
Mekado said:
My boss is actually the owner of the company, he dosen't answer to anyone (well, inside the company anyways hehe)
He answers to the accountant.

It really doesn't matter how senior you are or what time of year it is, if the accountant says two people have to go, two people have to go. Fat lot of good being a nice guy is if it runs you out of business and all fifty people end up without a job.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Mekado said:
My boss is actually the owner of the company, he dosen't answer to anyone (well, inside the company anyways hehe)
He answers to the accountant.

It really doesn't matter how senior you are or what time of year it is, if the accountant says two people have to go, two people have to go. Fat lot of good being a nice guy is if it runs you out of business and all fifty people end up without a job.
The problem with accountants is that sometimes they forget that while letting two people off might balance the bottom line, it may still cause the remaining staff to have to be at two places at the same time since work still needs to be done.

The paper can take everything, but looking at a business purely through numbers is recipe for disaster without the understanding why and how those numbers roll in.
 

IckleMissMayhem

New member
Oct 18, 2009
939
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Fat lot of good being a nice guy is if it runs you out of business and all fifty people end up without a job.
This. Also, "last one in, first one out" is usually standard in this sort of situation. Lazy guy got all he deserved though.
 

supermanNBC

New member
Nov 21, 2007
15
0
0
Were I work, people get laid off in November, or i should say end of November, I though it was company policy but apparently its a law in Canada were as a company cannot lay off anyone during December. You can still be fired if you don't do your job or steal. Personally was unaware of that fact, usually been fired or quit my jobs, have yet to been laid off yet. And so far survived several company lay offs in the 4 years I've been with the company.
 

Raggedstar

New member
Jul 5, 2011
753
0
0
Last year, I was still in school, so my boss was counting down the days when I would be unleashed for winter "vacation" (vacation...LOL. I worked all that time for as many as 10 hours per day those weeks). He told me one of my co-workers would be out the door as soon as I'm able to work typical days. He got mad at her for a lot of things, like talking to her mom when she was supposed to be monitoring surgery, not keeping up on inventories, and ruining an entire box of x-ray film. Still, it seemed kinda back-handed to do it a week (or a few days, can't remember when it was) before Christmas. He also expected me to keep it a secret for about 2 weeks (really shitty) until I was finally out and he did it at the end of her shift.
 
Aug 31, 2012
1,774
0
0
Mekado said:
Didn't stop our boss from buying a brand spanking new SL Mercedes 2 months ago but he works harder than any of us so i guess it's a bit unfair to frown on him buying cool stuff...
Also, depending on where you live that can be claimed as a business expense against tax. i.e. the money would have gone to the taxman if it hadn't been spent on that, or some other business "necessity".
 

Alandoril

New member
Jul 19, 2010
532
0
0
Mekado said:
renegade7 said:
I know some people who have worked in management. It is not easy letting people go at all, especially at this time of year. It's not easy to just tell them they no longer have a job. The first guy clearly deserved it. The second guy didn't but if they can't afford to keep him then that's just how life is sometimes.

Just wanted to put my thoughts in.
True enough, sometimes the "right" choice for the company isn't the "good guy" choice i suppose. At least he signed a letter of recommendation for the second guy...

We were growing 75-100% per year the last 6 years or so, this year though we've taken a bit of a beating on our main product and the other new products failed to meet even 50% of expectations. I suppose some kind of cutbacks were inevitable and since salaries are our biggest expense...

Didn't stop our boss from buying a brand spanking new SL Mercedes 2 months ago but he works harder than any of us so i guess it's a bit unfair to frown on him buying cool stuff...
That's the thing though, hard times almost never effect the guys at the "top." Funny that...

There's always enough money for their perks, but if a lower scale employee asks for anything there's never any budget for it.
 

Bertylicious

New member
Apr 10, 2012
1,400
0
0
Alandoril said:
Mekado said:
renegade7 said:
I know some people who have worked in management. It is not easy letting people go at all, especially at this time of year. It's not easy to just tell them they no longer have a job. The first guy clearly deserved it. The second guy didn't but if they can't afford to keep him then that's just how life is sometimes.

Just wanted to put my thoughts in.
True enough, sometimes the "right" choice for the company isn't the "good guy" choice i suppose. At least he signed a letter of recommendation for the second guy...

We were growing 75-100% per year the last 6 years or so, this year though we've taken a bit of a beating on our main product and the other new products failed to meet even 50% of expectations. I suppose some kind of cutbacks were inevitable and since salaries are our biggest expense...

Didn't stop our boss from buying a brand spanking new SL Mercedes 2 months ago but he works harder than any of us so i guess it's a bit unfair to frown on him buying cool stuff...
That's the thing though, hard times almost never effect the guys at the "top." Funny that...

There's always enough money for their perks, but if a lower scale employee asks for anything there's never any budget for it.
Whilst I have always thought that a companies pay structure ought to be dictated by a multiple (say x20) of the lowest paid person in the business, I think that attitude is a bit much.

A person in a unique position in an organisation has more scope for negotiation than someone in a not unique position. Like, lets say you work in a call centre and the person next to you is a balshy little shit. Lets say he makes a lot of bad noise and you've got a weak manager so they give him a pay rise, wouldn't you feel agreived if they didn't give you a pay rise as well?

What if he was balshy and better than you though? What if he worked harder? That would be his argument, after all.

It's never as straightforward as we thing or would like it to be.
 

Killclaw Kilrathi

Crocuta Crocuta
Dec 28, 2010
263
0
0
Strazdas said:
That Hyena Bloke said:
Nerexor said:
and they were the ones who did the least work and were assholes to everyone else
Full time workers can be the absolute bane to temps. One practice I find infuriating is when they pull temps off of their assigned tasks to help them with some trivial matter they could have done themselves, you either help them and get in trouble for not meeting your own quotas or you refuse and get in trouble for not being a "team player".
or help them and get your own quotas and the guy at the top notices you. cha :D
I hope you're joking, either that or you've never done temp work before. Temp quotas are specifically designed to be pretty much exactly what you can possibly achieve if you spend every minute of the work day on a single task. And that's if you're fortunate, if not it will always be deliberately just a little bit more than you can do so the supervisor can constantly get on your case and guilt you into working during your breaks. As for being noticed by the top, temps are completely invisible to the executive level.
 

Psykoma

New member
Nov 29, 2010
481
0
0
Mekado said:
The reason we got was "This dept is losing money, we need to cut the spending on it."
To be honest from my experience working, the reasons that the staff hear for a firing is at best 10-20% of the entire reason, and at worst a total lie to either protect A. The company or B. The departing employees reputation.


Vegosiux said:
The problem with accountants is that sometimes they forget that while letting two people off might balance the bottom line, it may still cause the remaining staff to have to be at two places at the same time since work still needs to be done.
I don't know where the accountants you know were trained, I went through accounting degree at McGill university, and am currently about 3/4 of the way through professional accounting designation program, and since our very first class it's been pounded into our heads that qualitative have to be weighed proportionally against quantitative results.

supermanNBC said:
Were I work, people get laid off in November, or i should say end of November, I though it was company policy but apparently its a law in Canada were as a company cannot lay off anyone during December. You can still be fired if you don't do your job or steal. Personally was unaware of that fact, usually been fired or quit my jobs, have yet to been laid off yet. And so far survived several company lay offs in the 4 years I've been with the company.
That may be policy at your company, or an obscure provincial law I don't know about, but there's no national law saying you can't be fired in December like you could be in any other month.
 

Vegosiux

New member
May 18, 2011
4,381
0
0
Psykoma said:
I don't know where the accountants you know were trained, I went through accounting degree at McGill university, and am currently about 3/4 of the way through professional accounting designation program, and since our very first class it's been pounded into our heads that qualitative have to be weighed proportionally against quantitative results.
Well your credentials notwithstanding, "qualitative results have to be weighed proportionally against quantitative results" sounds just vague enough to me that it seems like a cop-out that has so much room for interpretation it might as well have not been said at all.

I'm not saying accountants are a bunch of callous codgers sweeping toy soldiers (or workers) into the waste basket for lulz, but I am saying that they can and some of them do lose perspective. Absorbing information at the university is one thing, but the world out there doesn't always play nice with our rules.