Or, at least my nephew.
(BTW if this is TL/DR, my main question is at the bottom)
My nephew is 16 and smart. Not smart in the straight A's honor role smart, but smart as in he can see the world for what it is. Now, I was that kind of smart when I was a kid, and no it wasnt the "know it all" sort of smart kids tend to be. I am talking about the kind of smart that children shouldnt be at that age. The kind where you can see and understand the world and BS that goes on behind the scenes and in plain view. That kind of smart can really leave you discontent at a young age and let me tell, it is not a good thing and can lead to misanthropy and other generally anti-social attitudes and viewpoints.
So knowing this my sister asked me to talk to him. It seems he isnt really applying himself in school like she knows he can and his grades have pretty much leveled out at the C range(american grading system). Now being where he was those many years ago I can understand my sister's concern. So I agreed to talk to him seeing as how for some reason he relates to me more than his dad(a fact that aggrevates him to no end).
Now, I went in there thinking I knew exactly how to steer him into being a nice little cog in the great machine we call this bowl swirling excuse for a society. That is not how it went however. I listened to his point of view and realized that it was wrong of me to try and change him into being some braindead materialistic consumer driven zombie, even if it was for my big sister. Instead I simply steered him into making an effort so he could do what I do, which is make a decent enough living to be able to tell the world to fuck off and leave it to it's own devices.
Apparently that wasnt good enough. My brother-in-law is upset that I only seemed to "encourage" his anti-social behavior instead of convincing him to "be like everyone else" and fit in. Of course my big sis is only "disapointed" that I couldnt do more so that he would have an easier time of things and not end up like myself.
I simply informed them that there is little else I could do and I wouldnt be a party to "lobotomizing" him just so he could have more friends. Its not like he gets beat up or bullied, in fact if he was more like they want him to be it would be more likely he would be the bully in such a situation.
So what do the escapists think in this situation? Would it be better if I had been able to convince him to "be like everyone else" and be a good little cog in the machine? Or do you think that its best to let him discover his own path as he is no matter the outcome?
Do you think "fitting in" is really that important or do you only see it as a mechanism to keep kid's form being teased or "standing out" in a bad way? if so, do you think it is more of a negative commentary on society that it would rather force people to conform through the threat of consequenses(bullying/being a social outcaste) rather than be themselves no matter how popular they may be? If you think this only applies to highschool then you obviously havent had an office job or worked in corporate america.
(BTW if this is TL/DR, my main question is at the bottom)
My nephew is 16 and smart. Not smart in the straight A's honor role smart, but smart as in he can see the world for what it is. Now, I was that kind of smart when I was a kid, and no it wasnt the "know it all" sort of smart kids tend to be. I am talking about the kind of smart that children shouldnt be at that age. The kind where you can see and understand the world and BS that goes on behind the scenes and in plain view. That kind of smart can really leave you discontent at a young age and let me tell, it is not a good thing and can lead to misanthropy and other generally anti-social attitudes and viewpoints.
So knowing this my sister asked me to talk to him. It seems he isnt really applying himself in school like she knows he can and his grades have pretty much leveled out at the C range(american grading system). Now being where he was those many years ago I can understand my sister's concern. So I agreed to talk to him seeing as how for some reason he relates to me more than his dad(a fact that aggrevates him to no end).
Now, I went in there thinking I knew exactly how to steer him into being a nice little cog in the great machine we call this bowl swirling excuse for a society. That is not how it went however. I listened to his point of view and realized that it was wrong of me to try and change him into being some braindead materialistic consumer driven zombie, even if it was for my big sister. Instead I simply steered him into making an effort so he could do what I do, which is make a decent enough living to be able to tell the world to fuck off and leave it to it's own devices.
Apparently that wasnt good enough. My brother-in-law is upset that I only seemed to "encourage" his anti-social behavior instead of convincing him to "be like everyone else" and fit in. Of course my big sis is only "disapointed" that I couldnt do more so that he would have an easier time of things and not end up like myself.
I simply informed them that there is little else I could do and I wouldnt be a party to "lobotomizing" him just so he could have more friends. Its not like he gets beat up or bullied, in fact if he was more like they want him to be it would be more likely he would be the bully in such a situation.
So what do the escapists think in this situation? Would it be better if I had been able to convince him to "be like everyone else" and be a good little cog in the machine? Or do you think that its best to let him discover his own path as he is no matter the outcome?
Do you think "fitting in" is really that important or do you only see it as a mechanism to keep kid's form being teased or "standing out" in a bad way? if so, do you think it is more of a negative commentary on society that it would rather force people to conform through the threat of consequenses(bullying/being a social outcaste) rather than be themselves no matter how popular they may be? If you think this only applies to highschool then you obviously havent had an office job or worked in corporate america.