So far I am getting the impression that the problem with this movie is that its just another Superhero movie? Nothing that truly brakes the mold?
Samtemdo8 said:So far I am getting the impression that the problem with this movie is that its just another Superhero movie? Nothing that truly brakes the mold?
wizzy555 said:Yep it's pretty good. It falls over on the ending in my opinion but that shouldn't stop you from enjoying the rest of it.
They wrote themselves into a corner, everyone expects Ares but they establish they don't need Ares, but what the heck Ares anyway
Yesssss.BloatedGuppy said:snip
Yes but this is a weakness in the story, because if Ares isn't driving the wars then the motivation against him is undermined. It makes it out that she realised that men are complicated and capable of evil themselves but she should just kill Ares anyway because he's kind of an arsehole. Some good dialogue could have saved it but it wasn't great.Kolby Jack said:Also, I heard people thought the finale was weak, but other than a bit of dodgy CGI, I thought it was fine. I assume the people who thought it was weak weren't expecting Ares to actually show up and fight and keep this a very human story. I mean, that's an artsy route I guess but Ares is one of Wonder Woman's main enemies in the comics, OF COURSE he'd show up.
Not at all. I thought they were both different takes on what is (surprisingly, given the medium) a refreshingly offbeat character. Earnest, forthright, driven to do the right thing. Wonder Woman's appeal came through her innocence and completely unvarnished emotion and desire to help. There was a purity of purpose and warmth of character that is very beguiling. Character arc insists she'll have lost that post Episode 1, and you wonder how the actress will be able to handle that paradigm shift (as her appearance in BvS wasn't anywhere near as involving).Kolby Jack said:I loved the movie. Also, am I the only one who feels like Wonder Woman's unbelievably kind and warm character kind of makes Captain America's character less likable? Not a LOT, but just a bit. Like Wonder Woman finding solace and positivity in the clusterfuck that was World War 1 somehow makes Captain America's earnest "don't like bullies" attitude in already-heavily-romanticized World War 2 feel cheap by comparison.
I got the impression that Ares was just feeding her some shit with that line. I mean he was clearly manipulating events on all of the sides of the conflict. For him to manipulate all the major players, and then try and step back and say "hey, I didn't have anything to do with this" is just silly. Our own real world legal system would still consider that type of behavior criminal, so he's far from innocent in the events. And also, there was that bit after she kills him, where the German soldiers all take off their masks and helmets and look around, as if they just woke from some dream. So I think they were implying that he in fact, WAS manipulating them directly. I mean, if the war was simply due to "the evil in mens' hearts", then why would the Germans suddenly stop all conflict with the 5 people who attacked their base.wizzy555 said:Yes but this is a weakness in the story, because if Ares isn't driving the wars then the motivation against him is undermined. It makes it out that she realised that men are complicated and capable of evil themselves but she should just kill Ares anyway because he's kind of an arsehole. Some good dialogue could have saved it but it wasn't great.Kolby Jack said:Also, I heard people thought the finale was weak, but other than a bit of dodgy CGI, I thought it was fine. I assume the people who thought it was weak weren't expecting Ares to actually show up and fight and keep this a very human story. I mean, that's an artsy route I guess but Ares is one of Wonder Woman's main enemies in the comics, OF COURSE he'd show up.
That scene was pretty confusing.Happyninja42 said:I got the impression that Ares was just feeding her some shit with that line. I mean he was clearly manipulating events on all of the sides of the conflict. For him to manipulate all the major players, and then try and step back and say "hey, I didn't have anything to do with this" is just silly. Our own real world legal system would still consider that type of behavior criminal, so he's far from innocent in the events. And also, there was that bit after she kills him, where the German soldiers all take off their masks and helmets and look around, as if they just woke from some dream. So I think they were implying that he in fact, WAS manipulating them directly. I mean, if the war was simply due to "the evil in mens' hearts", then why would the Germans suddenly stop all conflict with the 5 people who attacked their base.
Remember, when she killed the red herring, she looked around, expecting to see the soldiers snap out of their state, as if waking from a dream. But that's exactly what DOES happen when she kills the real Ares. It's very apparent, as they cut between like 5 scenes of the soldiers doing the "whoa, where am I? What's going on?" kind of reaction. Even to the point of hugging the guy they were just fighting a minute ago? Sorry but if the true evil was all in their hearts, this wouldn't have happened. So some of it had to be Ares' influence.
Did you miss the part where as soon as she turned down Ares' offer he decided to kill her? She killed him by directing his own attack back onto him. He was the aggressor in their fight entirely.wizzy555 said:Yes but this is a weakness in the story, because if Ares isn't driving the wars then the motivation against him is undermined. It makes it out that she realised that men are complicated and capable of evil themselves but she should just kill Ares anyway because he's kind of an arsehole. Some good dialogue could have saved it but it wasn't great.Kolby Jack said:Also, I heard people thought the finale was weak, but other than a bit of dodgy CGI, I thought it was fine. I assume the people who thought it was weak weren't expecting Ares to actually show up and fight and keep this a very human story. I mean, that's an artsy route I guess but Ares is one of Wonder Woman's main enemies in the comics, OF COURSE he'd show up.
I'm not really referring to Cap's later movies, those are fine. I just feel like First Avenger Cap never really earned his earnestness and good guy nature. We never really see WHY he is as nice as he is. He's basically Captain America from the first moment he's on screen, just without the enhancements. Yes, we see him getting beat up by a bully, but speaking from experience that doesn't turn most people into a brave boy scout; quite the opposite, in fact. Wonder Woman's naivety and goodness are readily apparent from her isolated, peaceful upbringing.BloatedGuppy said:Not at all. I thought they were both different takes on what is (surprisingly, given the medium) a refreshingly offbeat character. Earnest, forthright, driven to do the right thing. Wonder Woman's appeal came through her innocence and completely unvarnished emotion and desire to help. There was a purity of purpose and warmth of character that is very beguiling. Character arc insists she'll have lost that post Episode 1, and you wonder how the actress will be able to handle that paradigm shift (as her appearance in BvS wasn't anywhere near as involving).Kolby Jack said:I loved the movie. Also, am I the only one who feels like Wonder Woman's unbelievably kind and warm character kind of makes Captain America's character less likable? Not a LOT, but just a bit. Like Wonder Woman finding solace and positivity in the clusterfuck that was World War 1 somehow makes Captain America's earnest "don't like bullies" attitude in already-heavily-romanticized World War 2 feel cheap by comparison.
Evans' Captain America, on the other hand, seems very beaten down. There's still a fundamental iron bar of conviction at the heart of him, but he's wrapped it up in layers of disillusionment and sadness. I actually find his performance in that role to be one of the 3-4 best of the entire modern era of superhero films. He managed to make an entirely uninteresting character fascinating. In the hands of a less nuanced actor Captain America could have been a boring Boy Scout, always piping about freedom and the American Way while biffing baddies on the chin.
I see no reason that he wouldn't lie. I mean, he said at one point "I'm not the God of War, I'm the God of Truth", which you know, if that's not true, and seeing as Ares is the god of WAR, that means he was lying.Bob_McMillan said:That scene was pretty confusing.
You could take it as Ares controlling them, but then that would mean that Ares was lying,
Which major theme of the film would be bullshit if Ares was lying? The fact that humans are willing to fight each other doesn't exclude the idea that Ares might be directly manipulating their baser urges to cause conflict where their might not have been before. Sort of like how being really drunk might compel someone to actually start a fist fight, when normally they would never do such a thing. Think of it as him breathing on the embers of their own anger, until it becomes a fire. Sure, the ember was already there, but that doesn't mean he didn't help it along.Bob_McMillan said:and that one of the major themes of the movie was bullshit. Which is just dumbass writing. If they really intended to do that, then my opinion of this movie would turn sour real quick.
Never saw that scene, but I still think it's an indication that those troops at least, were directly under his control. I mean, it's such a marked difference in behavior. Fighting tooth and nail while Ares lives, then when he dies, they all look around like they just woke up from a dream, shocked and surprised, and hugging each other (including the people they were shooting at 5 seconds before). That's just too sharp of a contrast in behavior for me to think it's "we're just glad to be alive" reaction, and more "wow, my head is suddenly clear of this anger, why the fuck am I shooting guns at people?" kind of thing. Sure it might not be, but that's what I take from it.Bob_McMillan said:I like to take it as the Germans just being glad to be alive. Like that scene in Battlefield 1's prologue, except not as well done.
Not that I saw. It was well structured, evenly paced, if a little rushed at times. The plot and personal motivations of the characters made sense, and were believable. Their interactions felt realistic to how actual humans would speak to each other in such a situation.Samtemdo8 said:Was there anything of this movie that confirms all those rumors that the movie is a mess?
Gordon_4 said:Like I said, the movie is by no means perfect. Ludendorff would probably have ended up a hero of the Nazi party in the DCEU. As for her motivation to side with Entente, the first contact she had with the Germans wasDragonlayer said:Gordon_4 said:Dragonlayer said:I have one very important question that will determine whether or not I will give this film a chance.
Are the German soldiers portrayed as a competent and legitimate threat, or as cackling yet utterly ineffectual proto-Nazis who are going to use radioactive moon-rock super-weapons to blow up the world and exist only to be effortlessly beaten up by Wonder Woman?The main German villain, General Ludendorff, does seem to come across as someone who desperately wants to be the Red Skull - even going so far as to kill one of his captains who makes a perfectly legitimate observation - an act I'm fairly confident in the German Army of the Kaiser's time would have been a one way trip to the gallows by way of a swift court martial. However he and Dr. Poison are outliers (seriously; one weak scene is the pair of them doing this evil laugh thing that's straight out of the Boris and Natasha Badinov playbook) and while it is cathartic to see them fight to liberate a village in France I personally never got the impression that the poor bastards in the other trench were mustache twirlers.
Again, that's only my impression based on my first showing. I'm going again and perhaps with a more critical eye I'll pick up more but I like the idea that the movie closes on.
Hmmm, I suppose they *have* to have the evil German villain and throw in some idiot executions of his own troops for good measure....wait wait wait, hang on! Why do they have to do that!? Why is Wonder Woman fighting against the Germans when, I assume that as an Amazon, she shouldn't have any cultural/political affinity with the Entente whatsoever? Aren't they supposed to be sealing themselves off from the rest of the world?them storming her island to kill Steve Trevor as a spy (which is fair enough on its own) but they act with no caution whatsoever coming ashore on an island that they have literally passed through a magic fog to reach. So in short; they kill dozens of people Diana has known for five thousand years including Antiope; her aunt, the general of the army and the one who trained her in secret until Hippolyta allowed her to train formally.
For what its worth, while she does basically hand the German's their arses in the fight scenes, she's NOT dropping quips like Buffy the Vampire Slayer while she's doing it and there is little to visually distinguish the British and German troops other than their uniform. They all look haggard, tired and confused: they fight as well as they can but fact is Diana is a massive force multiplier. It would be like giving the British at Rorke's Drift the equipment of a modern infantry regiment.
Hmmmm! Interesting: see, I was already aware of the real source of inspiration for Tavington, *and* that he was one of the more ruthless British officers during the war, so I wouldn't have minded the odd butchery here and there (nor am I naive enough to believe that criminal behaviour doesn't happen in every war). But it was the church burning scene that was an atrocity too far from my willing suspension of disbelief to handle, since they'd blatantly stolen it from an entirely different conflict, and had already framed the war in fairly black and white terms (granted, it's essentially the story of Mel Gibson's revenge against Jason Isaacs rather than a nuanced look at war, and as much as I rag on it here, I actually do quite enjoy the film).davidmc1158 said:Not wanting to derail the thread but as a historian I was compelled to add this small bit:Dragonlayer said:For example, see SS Oberstgruppenfuhrer Tavington of His Majesty's Redcoats casually shooting unarmed wounded, innocent civilians and then locking entire villages inside churches and burning them alive in The Patriot, because apparently America in 1776 was actually the Eastern Front, 1944.
Tavington's character was based (loosely) on Banastre Tarleton, cavalry officer and all around asshat. Among the accusations made against him were 1) ordering his men to bayonet the bodies of the enemy for 15 minutes after a battle to ensure no survivors, 2) ordering an 8 year old's throat to be slit because the kid might reveal his cavalry's movements to the colonials, and 3) when at a British officer's soiree he was heard to claim that he had "lain more women in America than any other British Army officer." To which another officer was heard to say "Don't you mean raped more women?"
As an aside note:
Hey Rom, when did you come back to 21st century Earth and make an account? (please tell me that was actually the character you were referencing)I had to go looking through the forum manually, like some sort of pre-industrial crazy person!
Dragonlayer said:Gordon_4 said:Like I said, the movie is by no means perfect. Ludendorff would probably have ended up a hero of the Nazi party in the DCEU. As for her motivation to side with Entente, the first contact she had with the Germans wasDragonlayer said:Gordon_4 said:Dragonlayer said:I have one very important question that will determine whether or not I will give this film a chance.
Are the German soldiers portrayed as a competent and legitimate threat, or as cackling yet utterly ineffectual proto-Nazis who are going to use radioactive moon-rock super-weapons to blow up the world and exist only to be effortlessly beaten up by Wonder Woman?The main German villain, General Ludendorff, does seem to come across as someone who desperately wants to be the Red Skull - even going so far as to kill one of his captains who makes a perfectly legitimate observation - an act I'm fairly confident in the German Army of the Kaiser's time would have been a one way trip to the gallows by way of a swift court martial. However he and Dr. Poison are outliers (seriously; one weak scene is the pair of them doing this evil laugh thing that's straight out of the Boris and Natasha Badinov playbook) and while it is cathartic to see them fight to liberate a village in France I personally never got the impression that the poor bastards in the other trench were mustache twirlers.
Again, that's only my impression based on my first showing. I'm going again and perhaps with a more critical eye I'll pick up more but I like the idea that the movie closes on.
Hmmm, I suppose they *have* to have the evil German villain and throw in some idiot executions of his own troops for good measure....wait wait wait, hang on! Why do they have to do that!? Why is Wonder Woman fighting against the Germans when, I assume that as an Amazon, she shouldn't have any cultural/political affinity with the Entente whatsoever? Aren't they supposed to be sealing themselves off from the rest of the world?them storming her island to kill Steve Trevor as a spy (which is fair enough on its own) but they act with no caution whatsoever coming ashore on an island that they have literally passed through a magic fog to reach. So in short; they kill dozens of people Diana has known for five thousand years including Antiope; her aunt, the general of the army and the one who trained her in secret until Hippolyta allowed her to train formally.
For what its worth, while she does basically hand the German's their arses in the fight scenes, she's NOT dropping quips like Buffy the Vampire Slayer while she's doing it and there is little to visually distinguish the British and German troops other than their uniform. They all look haggard, tired and confused: they fight as well as they can but fact is Diana is a massive force multiplier. It would be like giving the British at Rorke's Drift the equipment of a modern infantry regiment.Ah fair enough then, I suppose I can put aside my rampant Germanophilia in that case and give the movie a mostly snark-free viewing. Thanks for the posts, you've been very helpful!
Oh wait, just remembered one more thing! You mentioned the diabolical Ludendorff and the obviously totally friendly DR POISON: does this turn out to be like the first Captain America movie where there's an evil subfaction hiding inside the ranks of the historical enemy? And when you say "Ludendorff",
do you mean the actual Erich Ludendorff?
You also forgot that he takes magic Ancient Greek crack to get shitty super powers. That was just so pointless. They didn't go anywhere with that. He lasted a full 2 seconds against Wonder Woman. If they wanted him to seem to be Ares they should have just made him glorify war and be an asshole period.Kolby Jack said:Yes, it's Erich Ludendorff, actual real life WW1 general. Although he's not so much the head of an evil subfaction as he is just the only German general willing to go to any lengths to win the war. He's more just a rogue element in the German army. It's not quite a sharp and in some ways troubling divide as between the Nazis and Hydra.
That said, while the name is the same and their attitudes and philosophies towards war are the pretty much the same, there are some key differences between WW Ludendorff and real Ludendorff, chief among them WW Ludendorff lacking a sweet 'stache.