So how about that Devil May Cry 4: Special Edition huh?

Recommended Videos

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
Benpasko said:
A money grab that more than doubles the amount of playable characters in the game? It would be a money grab if it was just some hd textures. Even a single new playable character is a huge amount of content in DMC, and there are 3 in this game.
Vergil is pretty much just an HD upgrade from his time in DMC3: SE, but he does have a lot of new tricks like the concentration gauge. I'm wondering how Lady will play since CAPCOM has said she'll be a long-ranged fighter in contrast to the hack and slash of everyone else.
 

teh_Canape

New member
May 18, 2010
2,665
0
0
Infernai said:
Cette said:
Seems random to update it now but I'm into what they're adding here.

Of course the games biggest problem is the flow of the levels. Is that something they've talked about tweaking?
My theory is they're testing the waters of which direction they should take the series
maybe they're giving out both options to gauge the interest in each? I mean sure DMC4 will be way more liked due to the reputation of DmC, but who knows, maybe they set a parallel type deal having both franchises (or timelines, as it were) going on for those who prefer one over the other

I just hope they fix the fucking gross platforming parts of 4, that tower of blades still gives me nightmares
 

Infernai

New member
Apr 14, 2009
2,605
0
0
Beautiful End said:
Me: oh hey! A DMC4 special edition!! I never finished my original game so this is a great chance for me to fi--

*only on next gen consoles lol*

Me: oh...okay then. :|
Actually, it is going to get a PC release on Steam.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
teh_Canape said:
maybe they're giving out both options to gauge the interest in each? I mean sure DMC4 will be way more liked due to the reputation of DmC, but who knows, maybe they set a parallel type deal having both franchises (or timelines, as it were) going on for those who prefer one over the other
Not likely; the attempted reboot was a failure in every aspect. It didn't get better reviews than its predecessors, its sales were miserable, it was hated by the fanbase, it failed to get any new fans on board, and the game was just terrible to the point where even the Definitive Edition could not make it fun or interesting. If anything the release of DMC4: SE is the death knell of trying to sell NT's shlock.
 

Cette

Member
Legacy
Dec 16, 2011
177
0
1
Country
US
Aiddon said:
teh_Canape said:
maybe they're giving out both options to gauge the interest in each? I mean sure DMC4 will be way more liked due to the reputation of DmC, but who knows, maybe they set a parallel type deal having both franchises (or timelines, as it were) going on for those who prefer one over the other
Not likely; the attempted reboot was a failure in every aspect. It didn't get better reviews than its predecessors, its sales were miserable, it was hated by the fanbase, it failed to get any new fans on board, and the game was just terrible to the point where even the Definitive Edition could not make it fun or interesting. If anything the release of DMC4: SE is the death knell of trying to sell NT's shlock.
You are seriously overselling how bad DMC was. Now mind you they could have sold the exact same game with a few slight aesthetic redesigns to the main characters and renaming everyone and it wouldn't have even been close enough to be called a Devil May Cry knockoff. But when judged purely on it's own merits it's a pretty damn solid action game with stronger character development than the others in the series. Admittedly the banter was shit and the lead developer was unnecessarily antagonistic to the fanbase.

Still I'd rather see a new game in the original series. But I'd they could swing it I wouldn't mind seeing both continue in parallel.
 

Maximum Bert

New member
Feb 3, 2013
2,149
0
0
Infernai said:
Trish, who made her playable character debut in 2, is going to be along for the ride as an optional choice to go through Dantes missions. Meanwhile Lady is going to be an option for playing through Nero's missions. Both of these characters have their own unique move-sets, weapons and abilities that can be leveled up just like in 4 proper.
Are you sure your not confusing Trish with Lucia or is there some story im missing because admittedly I did not finish DMC2? (is Trish unlockable?) But Lucia was definitely a playable character I actually found her more fun than Dante to use in that game although that wasnt that hard.

As for the game I really dont care, playing as Trish could be fun but I hate Vergil and am indifferent about Lady. For me DMC died from DMC 2 onwards 2 and 4 left a particularly bad taste and 3 was kinda meh same with the reboot so yeah wont be getting this. Tbh Bayonetta has replaced my DMC fix and I still to this day do not know why they took the game off the team that made the first one because those guys were the only ones who knew what they were doing it seems. Then again Capcom have made some very strange decisions.
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
Cette said:
You are seriously overselling how bad DMC was. Now mind you they could have sold the exact same game with a few slight aesthetic redesigns to the main characters and renaming everyone and it wouldn't have even been close enough to be called a Devil May Cry knockoff. But when judged purely on it's own merits it's a pretty damn solid action game with stronger character development than the others in the series. Admittedly the banter was shit and the lead developer was unnecessarily antagonistic to the fanbase.

Still I'd rather see a new game in the original series. But I'd they could swing it I wouldn't mind seeing both continue in parallel.
Not even close; it was just boring which means it was a failure, only matched by the forgotten DMC2. There is no point in trying to play Devil's Advocate for something that bad . Being nice to crap does not magically turn it good. It will always be crap.

Maximum Bert said:
As for the game I really dont care, playing as Trish could be fun but I hate Vergil and am indifferent about Lady. For me DMC died from DMC 2 onwards 2 and 4 left a particularly bad taste and 3 was kinda meh same with the reboot so yeah wont be getting this. Tbh Bayonetta has replaced my DMC fix and I still to this day do not know why they took the game off the team that made the first one because those guys were the only ones who knew what they were doing it seems. Then again Capcom have made some very strange decisions.
Because they DIDN'T know what they were doing; Kamiya is a great ideas man, but when it comes to execution his games are always flawed, bringing with them irritating bullshit that was better left on the cutting room floor. Such as the underwater sections in DMC1, the CONSTANT, boring rail shooter sections and stupid QTEs in Bayonetta, and the attempts to vary up the gameplay in the Wonderful 101. It was only with the follow ups like DMC3 and Bayonetta 2 refining ideas that the series really became what they were supposed to be.
 

Maximum Bert

New member
Feb 3, 2013
2,149
0
0
Aiddon said:
Because they DIDN'T know what they were doing; Kamiya is a great ideas man, but when it comes to execution his games are always flawed, bringing with them irritating bullshit that was better left on the cutting room floor. Such as the underwater sections in DMC1, the CONSTANT, boring rail shooter sections and stupid QTEs in Bayonetta, and the attempts to vary up the gameplay in the Wonderful 101. It was only with the follow ups like DMC3 and Bayonetta 2 refining ideas that the series really became what they were supposed to be.
Bayonetta and DMC were definitely not perfect ill agree and I am also of the opinion that Bayonetta 2 is a refinement of the first but its clear that he and his team had more idea than the new one I mean look what we got with DMC2.

They went on to refine it with DMC3 ofc which was good but still lacked the flair and spirit that made the original so special and there is also no reason to think that Kamiya and his team could not have made DMC2 amazing if they had been left in control. I dont why he puts stupid annoying bits in so many of his games but the execution of the combat in DMC1 and later evolved in Bayonetta is the best in the business at what it does something which DMC2 - 4 lacked to lesser and greater degrees.

Also why the series was given to another team is a mystery if he didnt know what he was doing the game would have flopped but it didnt it built the foundation for a series imagine if the series had launched with DMC2 it would have been dead in the water. At the very least it looks like he knew more of what he was doing than the ones who took over and Capcom in general who had to reboot it (and failed at that).
 

Cette

Member
Legacy
Dec 16, 2011
177
0
1
Country
US
Aiddon said:
Not even close; it was just boring which means it was a failure, only matched by the forgotten DMC2. There is no point in trying to play Devil's Advocate for something that bad . Being nice to crap does not magically turn it good. It will always be crap.
You don't even have to play devil's advocate. It was a fine action game just a bad Devil May Cry. Hell I like it about as well as I do 4 though far less than 3.

You're a strident little thing aren't you?
 

Aiddon_v1legacy

New member
Nov 19, 2009
3,672
0
0
Cette said:
You don't even have to play devil's advocate. It was a fine action game just a bad Devil May Cry. Hell I like it about as well as I do 4 though far less than 3.

You're a strident little thing aren't you?
No, I'm just remembering things properly and realizing that there is no point to being "fair" when trying to do so is illogical. The game did nothing to match 1, 3, or 4, let alone surpassing them. Level design was rote, boring, and devoid of any sense of challenge. Combat had a low skill ceiling and quickly grew repetitive, mostly due to the abysmal enemy and weapon design which were uncreative, lacked variety, and somehow had less moves over more buttons.

And the ultimate sign that the game was a failure: it was forgotten, save for when NT tries to remind us of it in a desperate plea for relevance. The game BOMBED, not even reaching half of DMC4's numbers and was reviled by consumers for a good reason. It was forgotten in a month, quickly shoved aside for the far-superior Metal Gear Rising and then when The Wonderful 101 and Bayonetta 2 came along it was pushed further away. The release of DMC4: SE is the final nail in the coffin for the attempted reboot and thus we can leave behind a boring piece of tripe and move on to the series that is loved by millions.

Maximum Bert said:
Bayonetta and DMC were definitely not perfect ill agree and I am also of the opinion that Bayonetta 2 is a refinement of the first but its clear that he and his team had more idea than the new one I mean look what we got with DMC2.

They went on to refine it with DMC3 ofc which was good but still lacked the flair and spirit that made the original so special and there is also no reason to think that Kamiya and his team could not have made DMC2 amazing if they had been left in control. I dont why he puts stupid annoying bits in so many of his games but the execution of the combat in DMC1 and later evolved in Bayonetta is the best in the business at what it does something which DMC2 - 4 lacked to lesser and greater degrees.
And ideas don't mean a thing without execution. The original DMC and Bayonetta have not aged well; in fact, all of Kamiya's games are the same save for one: Okami. That is the ONLY game of his that does not have arbitrary crap shoved in that gets in the way of what matters. And he's never fixed his flaws, which is a problem. It's not wonder DMC became better when taken out of his hands, same for Bayonetta. Trying to play their original iterations after playing their far superior and refined sequels is going back severely.

Also why the series was given to another team is a mystery if he didnt know what he was doing the game would have flopped but it didnt it built the foundation for a series imagine if the series had launched with DMC2 it would have been dead in the water.
Because he has the attention span of a caffeinated magpie. The man makes something that could be a series goes "Bored now!" and moves on to something else, never learning from his flaws.

At the very least it looks like he knew more of what he was doing than the ones who took over and Capcom in general who had to reboot it (and failed at that).
That's on Inafune and his insecure, self-xenophobic crusade to pander to the West. And he's no longer there so I don't see that repeating any time soon, especially with DMC4: SE.