aba1 said:
So the last issue of Amazing Spiderman will be issue 700 but the story won't actually be ending, the story will continue with issue 1 of the Superior Spiderman. So if Superior Spiderman is number 1 than that logically means that it should in fact be the start of the story with no knowledge of Spiderman needed to start but it won't be the start of the story which is incredibly misleading and really improperly labeled since it isn't really the first issue of the story it is actually the 701st. This same logic could be applied to just about all the DC's New 52 line minus a handful of titles.
Ummm another example I could use was something that came up just a few days ago when I was lending my girlfriend a few graphic novels. The problem was that the series was 4 novels long but none of them had a number on them or any indication of which came first or last or even if they were even associated at all since the base title alone in comics doesn't even guarantee that. In the end we had to start reading them at random just to figure out the order and in the end after she had read them all it turned out we missed the first one and that was why huge chunks of the story were missing for her.
"I'm trying to read Lord of the Rings, but I can't work out the order! I read the Two Towers and the Return of the King but it turned out there was one at the start that I missed and so I was missing huge chunks of the story! And don't get me started on the Narnia or Discworld series!
Why can't authors just keep the titles the same and put numbers after them so it's easy to work out?!?"
If you want to know the order of a story, look it up on Wikipedia, or another site and if a comic restarts as number 1, they're probably trying to tell you that you can start reading there without any real loss to the story. Let's face it, it's nearly impossible to start at the very beginning any more, there's just too many.