So I got a Manga late last month and I feel kinda weird about it...

[RaikuFA]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

 

[RaikuFA]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

 

[RaikuFA]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

 

[RaikuFA]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

If you didn't know how to ask a girl out would you ask another girl on how to or a guy?

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

If you didn't know how to ask a girl out would you ask another girl on how to or a guy?

I'd not be a git and therefore ask someone closer to the person I want to ask out.

 

[sageoftruth]

I have the exact opposite view of what one ought do due to this being the internet.

Instead of being overly-cautious, one ought be overly-tolerant and try the most to read everything while always giving the benefit of the doubt and trying to not find offense. The internet is really good at letting people be rude when they want to in no uncertain terms you see, if someone wants to be offensive they have no reason to be roundabout with it. That being so, if you aren't sure if you should mind something or not, because it's the internet, better not mind it until you absolutely feel like you must.

Well, one could always be both cautious and tolerant. As much as I respect your idea of internet etiquette, I can't force others to follow it. Merely expecting tolerance from others online will often lead to disappointment. Internet interactions are often between strangers and everyone's guard is up. Respectful and open dialogue is often the ticket to cracking their shell and turning a standoff into a constructive discussion.

 

[Dreiko_v1legacy]

I have the exact opposite view of what one ought do due to this being the internet.

Instead of being overly-cautious, one ought be overly-tolerant and try the most to read everything while always giving the benefit of the doubt and trying to not find offense. The internet is really good at letting people be rude when they want to in no uncertain terms you see, if someone wants to be offensive they have no reason to be roundabout with it. That being so, if you aren't sure if you should mind something or not, because it's the internet, better not mind it until you absolutely feel like you must.

Well, one could always be both cautious and tolerant. As much as I respect your idea of internet etiquette, I can't force others to follow it. Merely expecting tolerance from others online will often lead to disappointment. Internet interactions are often between strangers and everyone's guard is up. Respectful and open dialogue is often the ticket to cracking their shell and turning a standoff into a constructive discussion.

The one who needs to be tolerant isn't the one you suggest ought be cautious, which puts the onus on the people expressing themselves and not the ones interpreting the expression. The problem with that is that you can feasibly interpret just about anything in an overly negative way so if one tries to absolutely ensure no offense is taken, they would have to starve their words of any interesting elements, resulting in a low quality communication, sanitized as though they are lawyers.

I prefer to have an easygoing style instead and expect people to use their common sense and realize that and I view as dishonest actors those who clearly see something being said in a lighthearted way but choose to interpret it negatively anyways such that they have something to fault-find about and make reasons up for complaining. These individuals do not warrant the cost of such a sanitized communication approach.

Oh and of course I don't want to force anyone to follow anything, I am content with simply calling the ones who don't dense or dishonest, that's good enough for me.

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

I have the exact opposite view of what one ought do due to this being the internet.

Instead of being overly-cautious, one ought be overly-tolerant and try the most to read everything while always giving the benefit of the doubt and trying to not find offense. The internet is really good at letting people be rude when they want to in no uncertain terms you see, if someone wants to be offensive they have no reason to be roundabout with it. That being so, if you aren't sure if you should mind something or not, because it's the internet, better not mind it until you absolutely feel like you must.

Well, one could always be both cautious and tolerant. As much as I respect your idea of internet etiquette, I can't force others to follow it. Merely expecting tolerance from others online will often lead to disappointment. Internet interactions are often between strangers and everyone's guard is up. Respectful and open dialogue is often the ticket to cracking their shell and turning a standoff into a constructive discussion.

The one who needs to be tolerant isn't the one you suggest ought be cautious, which puts the onus on the people expressing themselves and not the ones interpreting the expression. The problem with that is that you can feasibly interpret just about anything in an overly negative way so if one tries to absolutely ensure no offense is taken, they would have to starve their words of any interesting elements, resulting in a low quality communication, sanitized as though they are lawyers.

The mentality that just because you can't eradicate something that's somehow supposed to be a reason not to even try is just ridiculous. Like this mentality doesn't even ask itself if there's a reasonable line.

 

[Dreiko_v1legacy]

I have the exact opposite view of what one ought do due to this being the internet.

Instead of being overly-cautious, one ought be overly-tolerant and try the most to read everything while always giving the benefit of the doubt and trying to not find offense. The internet is really good at letting people be rude when they want to in no uncertain terms you see, if someone wants to be offensive they have no reason to be roundabout with it. That being so, if you aren't sure if you should mind something or not, because it's the internet, better not mind it until you absolutely feel like you must.

Well, one could always be both cautious and tolerant. As much as I respect your idea of internet etiquette, I can't force others to follow it. Merely expecting tolerance from others online will often lead to disappointment. Internet interactions are often between strangers and everyone's guard is up. Respectful and open dialogue is often the ticket to cracking their shell and turning a standoff into a constructive discussion.

The one who needs to be tolerant isn't the one you suggest ought be cautious, which puts the onus on the people expressing themselves and not the ones interpreting the expression. The problem with that is that you can feasibly interpret just about anything in an overly negative way so if one tries to absolutely ensure no offense is taken, they would have to starve their words of any interesting elements, resulting in a low quality communication, sanitized as though they are lawyers.

The mentality that just because you can't eradicate something that's somehow supposed to be a reason not to even try is just ridiculous. Like this mentality doesn't even ask itself if there's a reasonable line.

It's not even about eradicating it, you can't at all combat it in any shape or form because it's all based on subjective interpretation which is infallible and uncorrectable. You can't say "you shouldn't feel offended by this" to someone, if they feel offended that's their reality no matter what you say or do or what the facts are.

You kinda have to just "agree to disagree" and move on. There's literally no other way of solving that impasse. That being so, I just accept their reality and judge them for their perception of it.

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

I have the exact opposite view of what one ought do due to this being the internet.

Instead of being overly-cautious, one ought be overly-tolerant and try the most to read everything while always giving the benefit of the doubt and trying to not find offense. The internet is really good at letting people be rude when they want to in no uncertain terms you see, if someone wants to be offensive they have no reason to be roundabout with it. That being so, if you aren't sure if you should mind something or not, because it's the internet, better not mind it until you absolutely feel like you must.

Well, one could always be both cautious and tolerant. As much as I respect your idea of internet etiquette, I can't force others to follow it. Merely expecting tolerance from others online will often lead to disappointment. Internet interactions are often between strangers and everyone's guard is up. Respectful and open dialogue is often the ticket to cracking their shell and turning a standoff into a constructive discussion.

The one who needs to be tolerant isn't the one you suggest ought be cautious, which puts the onus on the people expressing themselves and not the ones interpreting the expression. The problem with that is that you can feasibly interpret just about anything in an overly negative way so if one tries to absolutely ensure no offense is taken, they would have to starve their words of any interesting elements, resulting in a low quality communication, sanitized as though they are lawyers.

The mentality that just because you can't eradicate something that's somehow supposed to be a reason not to even try is just ridiculous. Like this mentality doesn't even ask itself if there's a reasonable line.

It's not even about eradicating it, you can't at all combat it in any shape or form because it's all based on subjective interpretation which is infallible and uncorrectable. You can't say "you shouldn't feel offended by this" to someone, if they feel offended that's their reality no matter what you say or do or what the facts are.

You kinda have to just "agree to disagree" and move on. There's literally no other way of solving that impasse. That being so, I just accept their reality and judge them for their perception of it.

Just because something is subjective doesn't mean that you can't possibly ever affect how people perceive it. It is easily possible to convey one's opinion in a way that's more easily interpret able to most people. And quite frankly it's easily possible that someone just says something that's sexist or some shit and gets flack for it, no matter how they fluff it. But when it's not then just conveying the meaning more clearly should reduce negative responses. How people react and interpret things is not not some mystical and unknowable thing that you have utterly no input into.

 

[Dreiko_v1legacy]

I have the exact opposite view of what one ought do due to this being the internet.

Instead of being overly-cautious, one ought be overly-tolerant and try the most to read everything while always giving the benefit of the doubt and trying to not find offense. The internet is really good at letting people be rude when they want to in no uncertain terms you see, if someone wants to be offensive they have no reason to be roundabout with it. That being so, if you aren't sure if you should mind something or not, because it's the internet, better not mind it until you absolutely feel like you must.

Well, one could always be both cautious and tolerant. As much as I respect your idea of internet etiquette, I can't force others to follow it. Merely expecting tolerance from others online will often lead to disappointment. Internet interactions are often between strangers and everyone's guard is up. Respectful and open dialogue is often the ticket to cracking their shell and turning a standoff into a constructive discussion.

The one who needs to be tolerant isn't the one you suggest ought be cautious, which puts the onus on the people expressing themselves and not the ones interpreting the expression. The problem with that is that you can feasibly interpret just about anything in an overly negative way so if one tries to absolutely ensure no offense is taken, they would have to starve their words of any interesting elements, resulting in a low quality communication, sanitized as though they are lawyers.

The mentality that just because you can't eradicate something that's somehow supposed to be a reason not to even try is just ridiculous. Like this mentality doesn't even ask itself if there's a reasonable line.

It's not even about eradicating it, you can't at all combat it in any shape or form because it's all based on subjective interpretation which is infallible and uncorrectable. You can't say "you shouldn't feel offended by this" to someone, if they feel offended that's their reality no matter what you say or do or what the facts are.

You kinda have to just "agree to disagree" and move on. There's literally no other way of solving that impasse. That being so, I just accept their reality and judge them for their perception of it.

Just because something is subjective doesn't mean that you can't possibly ever affect how people perceive it. It is easily possible to convey one's opinion in a way that's more easily interpret able to most people. And quite frankly it's easily possible that someone just says something that's sexist or some shit and gets flack for it, no matter how they fluff it. But when it's not then just conveying the meaning more clearly should reduce negative responses. How people react and interpret things is not not some mystical and unknowable thing that you have utterly no input into.

This is under the described scenario of a normally easygoing and actually not at all sexist statement being misinterpreted through borderline dishonesty and fault-finding tendencies. Of course you will do what you can within reason to avoid such issues in the first place, that is inherent in the confines of natural easygoing comments, but the thing is that there's a limit to what is doable from that and when that fails it isn't because of a simple miscommunication.

And yeah, I agree, most people won't be offended by such statements, but the ones who will be are the ones who will usually respond so their side will be over-represented. They're the ones you just agree to disagree with.

 

[Kae]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

Actually as someone has watched the anime[footnote]I haven't read the manga only watched the Anime that has episodes that are like 7 minutes long.[/footnote] he probably means of women's physiology as the anime does a lot of jokes regarding women's bodies, there's an episode about menstruation and so on, the jokes themselves do not feel mean-spirited either they feel as the kind of jokes girls would make to make their other more prudish girl-friends cringe, for me it was nothing that felt particularly weird but I can see how that would leave a person as breast-obsessed as Paragon wanting answers, since there are a lot of skits about boobs and such, I believe there's an episode about the size of areola's depending on the size of the breast ad so on, forgive him, he's a bit too immature about these things.

 

[RaikuFA]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

If you didn't know how to ask a girl out would you ask another girl on how to or a guy?

I'd not be a git and therefore ask someone closer to the person I want to ask out.

But then that person can just warn her friend about me and do their best to sabotage it.

OT: I picked this up last night. The questions are more health class related.

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

If you didn't know how to ask a girl out would you ask another girl on how to or a guy?

I'd not be a git and therefore ask someone closer to the person I want to ask out.

But then that person can just warn her friend about me and do their best to sabotage it.

OT: I picked this up last night. The questions are more health class related.

Sounds like a you problem if everyone you meet doesn't want their friends to go out with you. Or a matter of paranoia on your part if you're just imagining that's people's automatic reactions.

 

[RaikuFA]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

If you didn't know how to ask a girl out would you ask another girl on how to or a guy?

I'd not be a git and therefore ask someone closer to the person I want to ask out.

But then that person can just warn her friend about me and do their best to sabotage it.

OT: I picked this up last night. The questions are more health class related.

Sounds like a you problem if everyone you meet doesn't want their friends to go out with you. Or a matter of paranoia on your part if you're just imagining that's people's automatic reactions.

It was an experience in high school. I doubt it'd happen again but you never know with people.

 

[Secondhand Revenant]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

If you didn't know how to ask a girl out would you ask another girl on how to or a guy?

I'd not be a git and therefore ask someone closer to the person I want to ask out.

But then that person can just warn her friend about me and do their best to sabotage it.

OT: I picked this up last night. The questions are more health class related.

Sounds like a you problem if everyone you meet doesn't want their friends to go out with you. Or a matter of paranoia on your part if you're just imagining that's people's automatic reactions.

It was an experience in high school. I doubt it'd happen again but you never know with people.

Then a paranoia problem if you take that to mean that's the standard reaction.

Also you do tend to know with people if you get to know them.

 

[RaikuFA]

And I also have a shitton more questions about women now, that would be super awkward to ever have to ask. All this comic has done is give me unanswerable questions.

If your question is "Do all women-" and doesn't end in "-have their own individual opinions and thoughts?" then the answer is no.
The unanswerable, answered.

At least he's trying to learn how the opposite gender thinks.

This assumes a gender thinks a particular way, which is probably not the most helpful way to actually understand how people think

Better than him assuming every girl is trying to emulate the Kardashians. Instead of them being human. Though I can personally say I can read what every girl thinks of me. Like the one that just rang me up at the store thought I was Bigfoot. Maybe a muscular wookie.

If your standard for a good idea is 'it could be worse' then you really should rethink your standards.

Also was more your idea than his. I've not seen him say it the way you did.

Not everyone's a psychic.

And you need to be a psychic to... what? Not assume a gender thinks alike?

Just knowing what someones thinking.

What exactly is the reason for pointing this out? Like what is the relevance you think pointing it out has?

Just trying to say guys arent psychic and have to ask about women.

Okay and I never said people shouldn't ask others questions. But you seem to have a bizarre idea that you could ask a woman how their gender thinks as if any of them could answer for their gender. Anyone that tells you they can answer how their gender thinks is probably way too full of themselves.

If you didn't know how to ask a girl out would you ask another girl on how to or a guy?

I'd not be a git and therefore ask someone closer to the person I want to ask out.

But then that person can just warn her friend about me and do their best to sabotage it.

OT: I picked this up last night. The questions are more health class related.

Sounds like a you problem if everyone you meet doesn't want their friends to go out with you. Or a matter of paranoia on your part if you're just imagining that's people's automatic reactions.

It was an experience in high school. I doubt it'd happen again but you never know with people.

Then a paranoia problem if you take that to mean that's the standard reaction.

Also you do tend to know with people if you get to know them.

That is true. But I've kinda given up at this point. I know it ain't gonna happen so why even try?