True.Helmholtz Watson said:If I recall correctly, Bond is described in the book as having blue eyes. I'm pretty sure that means he is White.
Wikipedia said:Looks
Fleming compares Bond's appearance to Hoagy Carmichael.
Facially, Bond resembles the composer, singer and actor Hoagy Carmichael. In Casino Royale Vesper Lynd remarks, "Bond reminds me rather of Hoagy Carmichael, but there is something cold and ruthless." Likewise, in Moonraker, Special Branch Officer Gala Brand thinks that Bond is "certainly good-looking ... Rather like Hoagy Carmichael in a way. That black hair falling down over the right eyebrow. Much the same bones. But there was something a bit cruel in the mouth, and the eyes were cold." Others, such as journalist Ben Macintyre, identify aspects of Fleming's own looks in his description of Bond. General references in the novels describe Bond as having "dark, rather cruel good looks".
In the novels (notably From Russia, with Love), Bond's physical description has generally been consistent: slim build; a three-inch long, thin vertical scar on his right cheek; blue-grey eyes; a "cruel" mouth; short, black hair, a comma of which falls on his forehead. Physically he is described as 183 centimetres (6 feet) in height and 76 kilograms (167 lb) in weight. After Casino Royale, Bond also had the faint scar of the Russian cyrillic letter "Ш" (SH) (for Shpion: "Spy") on the back of one of his hands, carved by a SMERSH agent.
No not really. I feel that's over thinking it. Bond is British that's about it.PhiMed said:So, acting as the best, most murderific agent of the secret service of the country that stood as the sterling example of the epitome of European Imperialism for more than a century wouldn't be a "racial" role?
Really?
As he is English that should be fine. See Luther.rbstewart7263 said:long as he can pull a british accent and makes him feel like bond and not every trite hero on bet network(which I know edris wouldnt do hes far too talented) Than its cool.
Commerford said:Doesn't bother me at all that there could be a black bond, in fact i'm more pissed about the new Quartermaster.
Intrigued.Torrasque said:If Idris Elba actually does turn out to be the next Bond, how would you feel?
No.Torrasque said:Do you think James Bond is a role that only white guys should play?
My first thought was an action-comedy starring Jackie Chan.Torrasque said:How would you feel about an asian James Bond?
It depends, I think.Torrasque said:Do you think there are certain roles that shouldn't be open to everyone? (certain races, certain genders, etc.)
My analogies were just basics. Would you have a woman play Superman or Batman? If so, why? My point was that a casting director would say no simply because that doesn't fit the part. This isn't to say women can't play male parts, obviously. There have been some fantastic male roles played by women. But it's a casual thing, like saying "Oh, you don't fit the part because of this and this" and nobody says a thing except "oh, yeah, that's fair."1blackone said:First, let me say I agreed with the majority of your post except for this segment. The problem with the first is that your Analogies don't exactly apply. SuperMAN shouldn't be a woman? Makes sense, since there is an intrinsic value that Superman holds (being a man) that making the character a woman would actively counter-act. HOWEVER, there's nothing intrinsically CAUCASIAN about the character of James Bond, only BRITISH! Last time I checked, black people HAVE actually been birthed within the borders of GB.ninjaRiv said:I'm on the side of "White actors for white characters." Now hear me out. Idris was fantastic in Thor and Jackson is a great Fury but those characters were originally white. And it's nothing to do with racism. It SHOULD be the same as telling a woman they can't play Superman because of their gender, telling a dwarf he can't play the tallest man in the world or just telling someone they can't play a character because they don't have the right nose or something. It should be just... One of those things! A simple requirement for playing an established character.
Now many people say it's OK for black people to play white characters but not the other way around and that's BS.
Even to say "oh, Bond's backstory puts him in a Scottish orphanage" holds little weight: I'm pretty sure if a resident parents who just happened to be black (just like Craig's parents HAPPENED to be white) died in a Scottish neighborhood, they wouldn't ship him off just because he's black: they'd put the kid in a Scottish orphanage(he's not a special needs patient that Scotland can't handle, his skin is darker!).
Again, not arguing whether or not Elba should be Bond or not. Only illuminating how your arguments are flawed =
The 2nd part is just simple debunking. Trust me, it goes both ways. For example, no black actress has EVER played the Cleopatra in a main-stream "Big Studio" production. First it was Claudine Colbert, Then Liz Taylor, Then a Chilean actress (forget her name). Even now, in 2000 and freakin' 12. Whose gonna play Cleo ? Zoey Zaldana? Violet Davis? Taraji P. Henson? Halle Berry?
Nope. Angelina Jolie.
But, playing the victim is tacky, so lets both stop doing it...
In the books he's described as looking like Hoagy Carmichael.StBishop said:Although Bond is a book adaptation I personally have no knowledge of the Bond books, I don't know how he's described. I think any adaptation should be visually accurate.
Hahaha my first thought of that was this.Woodsey said:Wouldn't have a problem with it, although they'll be faced with a reboot again. Bit of a stretch to say that a black guy grew up in the Scotland wilderness as a boy in the 70s.
Yeah that theory's been debunked.SpectacularWebHead said:I've always had a theory about James Bond. There isn't any one man named James Bond. When you attain the rank of 00, the government asigns you a number AND A NAME. James Bond is simply the pseudonym attached to 007. Every 006 might be called Jack Branley, every 009 John Birch, and so on. It would also explain why you can have such different actors playing james bond. He isn't one man, he is simply a name and a number. And by that logic, Idris Elba as James Bond works fine.
(I know the books would probably not conscibe to this theory, and it's not official or even a rumour in any way, but I think It would A: make sense and B: be pretty cool)