So, If everyone with HIV/Aids dies,there would be no more HIV/Aids.

[ElPatron]

Still not a permanent solution.

Did I say it was?

And yes, just a few years does not count as virtually permanent at all. In those "few" years without AIDS we would probably evolve some more and couldn't be affected by HIV in any way.

 

[LuckyClover95]

Did you know, something like 1% of Germans are naturally immune to HIV. Fun fact. I read it.

Not immune, resistant and it's a mutation found in 10% of Europeans not 1%. The constant plagues that finally died out in the 1600's across most of Europe and in the 1800s in Russia and Eastern Europe is probably what selected for the mutation. As it appears it was only present in 1 out of 20,000 people before.

Anyway. I googled the shit out of this, and that's what I found.

Oh, okay. What does resistant mean exactly?
I read 1% of Germans, that might still fit in with 10% of Europeans.
Also, does this count Britain as Europe?

 

[LarenzoAOG]

Still not a permanent solution.

Did I say it was?

And yes, just a few years does not count as virtually permanent at all. In those "few" years without AIDS we would probably evolve some more and couldn't be affected by HIV in any way.

Maybe, one day we might find out.

 

[crystalsnow]

Firstly , animals don't carry the same virus that affects humans. Animals can have HIV/aids but cannot give it to humans.

Secondly, aids cannot be developped, it has to be passed on by another person , if everyone who had is dead (im not saying kill them ) the chances of it comig back are slim to none , especially because it's transmissible only by blood , seman and vaginal fluid.

Finally, there are cases ( a lot even ) of hiv/ aids in first world countries , if what you say was true then AIDS should be exclusive to third world countries , which it's not. It just sprends quicker in third world countries due to lack of education , lack of proper prevention methods and lack of people caring . But it is not exclusive to these "uncivilised" countries , if it was people would care a lot less.

Also , people in "civilized" countries have methodes to prevent it from spreading, yet Kit still does, why is this? Because of ignorance and stupidity and carelessness,simple as that . Theres no reason for the virus to spread in say North america .

EDIT: also note , a good way to contract AIDS is also by sharing syringes for drug use ( although i'm not sure if this is still comon practice i sure hope not). Another reason it could get passed by in "civilized" regions.

There is clearly no point in furthering a discussion with you since you not only lack the capacity to reason but also read.