I second that. What the hell are they talking about?werewolfsfury said:I don't even understand what this thread is about but probably something bad
I second that. What the hell are they talking about?werewolfsfury said:I don't even understand what this thread is about but probably something bad
1) Can'tMacgyvercas said:My plan to balance the federal budget:
1) Eliminate corporate welfare. All of it.
2) Cut the salaries of all senators, congressmen, representatives, the president, etc. by 50%.
3) Pull out of Iraq and Afghanastan (sp?).
4) Cut the defense budget by 15%.
It is free, you can vote for anyone you want, you can even write in.SaneAmongInsane said:I haven't gotten a clear answer from anyone, it ranges from "It won't be so bad" to "Apocalyptic" can someone explain exactly what's gonna happen?
ugh... I really hate our Dumb and Dumber two party system... Free election my ass.
I'm sorry. You're saying "amen" to the 'media's fear-mongering bullshit', and then advising people to go watch Zeitgeist Addendum? That is some messed up backwards shit.Khada said:amen!Staskala said:First world nations can't default. Stop listening to the fear-mongering bullshit that a certain part of your media likes to propagate.
If the USA was even close to defaulting, they'd raise taxes, cut spending or, you know, just move out of Iraq.
EDIT... better extend that else i'll cop the ban hammer again... =.=..
The debt ceiling is an arbitrary number that can be changed whenever it's needed. Go watch Zeitgeist Addendum for a clearer understanding of how the monetary system works.
Damn! There's still a chance something could go wrong, and then my fuck people with missiles and bullets plan could be put to work. /sarcasm stillSaucycardog said:We've done it! We can all breath a sigh of relief.....for now.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43949638/ns/politics-capitol_hill/?gt1=43001
Not really, it's just a declaration of affirmation. Yes it's been largely adopted by religious groups but they don't own it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AmenEvilPicnic said:I'm sorry. You're saying "amen" to the 'media's fear-mongering bullshit', and then advising people to go watch Zeitgeist Addendum? That is some messed up backwards shit.Khada said:amen!Staskala said:First world nations can't default. Stop listening to the fear-mongering bullshit that a certain part of your media likes to propagate.
If the USA was even close to defaulting, they'd raise taxes, cut spending or, you know, just move out of Iraq.
EDIT... better extend that else i'll cop the ban hammer again... =.=..
The debt ceiling is an arbitrary number that can be changed whenever it's needed. Go watch Zeitgeist Addendum for a clearer understanding of how the monetary system works.
It's obscene that the US is sleep-walking into an avoidable default when the Eurozone is battling so hard (and failing) to stay afloat. This affects us all, globally. The politicians should be fucking ashamed.
That was the past. The Bundeswehr (today's German army) is a completely defensive army. Tactics, strategies and equipment, all have the only goal of entrenchment. That was one of the conditions of rearming Germany after WWII.harmonic said:We've all seen what determined German armies can do. I for one would be more comfortable with them on my team.
Not sure why being worth more than NZ is news, since it was always like that.[sub]One day we'll beat you damn it xD[/sub] Aaah well, it has been improving for us Kiwis.Radelaide said:Australia maybe. The Australian dollar is worth more than the NZ and US both.Nouw said:People will come to New Zealand >![]()
![]()
I was nine when Harper was opposition leader, so I've only really seen actions from Paul Martin and Jean Cretien during that period; I've never really seen what Harper did. But then, the only thing I've seen from Harper during his tenure as opposition leader that would have fucked us over was his push to participate in the Iraq invasion. When he was elected by the newly formed Conservative party it was on top of a platform to move the party further to the center. I'd also just briefly like to say that while I can't talk about OL Harper from 2002/03 with any kind of confidence, modern Harper is definately not a Republican. Hell I think Jon Stewart even said after harper was elected "Congradulations to Canada's Stephen Harper and his Conservative party for their revent election win. Of course conservative there means Ultra-Pinko-Commie-Gay-Liberal party here, but hey conservative is conservative!"s69-5 said:All due to the financial policies adopted by the previous (ie Liberal) governemtn. During that time, if Harper had his way, Canada would surely be in the same mess as the U.S.A. Or did you not follow his plans while he was leader of opposition?MoNKeyYy said:NOTE:The rules of the internet state that every post in a thread decreases in relevance to the original topics69-5 said:Let's just hope Canada wakes up and boots Harper sooner than later as he seems to read from the same playbook as the Republiscans.
I'd just like to point out that during the 2008 budget debate Harper was getting tonnes of flak from every other party for "Not using the surplus money for the benefit of Canadians". Layton in particular was critisizing him using the money to pay off debt instead of putting it into other projects. When the global recession hit that year Harper was holding a big WHO'S IRRESPONSIBLE NOW BITCHES Sign over his head while Canada sat securely on top of the 'Most Stable Economy' list.
I meant we should keep buying those $50,000 toilet seats instead of having a billion multiples of the same govt-funded program.UrKnightErrant said:Besides which, you're not cutting enough to balance the budget. We borrow 40% of our total annual operating budget. That's 1.5 trillion dollars. The wars cost a little less than 200 billion. 15% of the military budget is less than 150 billion. Now corporate welfare is tricky because it's disguised as tax cuts and exemptions. What you're really talking about is an increase in corporate taxes, and I'm with you on that. Let's double it. That'll increase revenues almost 350 billion. I like the way you're thinking, but cutting the salaries of elected officials isn't really going to save even 1 billion, so for our purposes it's a negligible cut. McNinja, sorry. We can't stop buying those $50,000 toilet seats. That's not government waste. That's how we hide expenditures to stuff we don't want people to know about like the CIA and Area 51. Besides, we've already addressed military spending.McNinja said:-snip-
So... ad it all together... You've cut 700 billion. Actually less. I tended to estimate expenditures high. But even so, you didn't quite get us halfway there. Any other suggestions?