1) I came to the site for Yahtzee and joined the forums so I could vote in polls. I mostly lurk, but occasionally post when my opinion hasn't already been represented by someone else.
2) I like the focus on actual discussion, rather than the single sentence back and forth that a lot of sites have. I also enjoy the fact that most people attempt proper capitalization and grammar.
I dislike that it's quite common to see dismissal of criticism. I'm not saying actual counter arguments against criticism. Canned phrases like "Don't like it, Don't buy it", "corporations exist to make money", "vote with your wallet", "it's target demographic is kids/women/casuals not you", "your just entitled", etc. that are just used in an attempt to dismiss a person's argument out of hand rather than to actually refute any of the points that have been made.
3) The forums have definitely changed, since I came here. Countless frequent posters have either been banned or just stop posting. With the amount of regulars that have been switched out for new ones it's impossible for the discussion to have not changed. Other than the changes from having a different group of people, there have been several major events that have left permanent marks on the forum. Anita Sarkeesian, and Gamergate in particular have pretty much engraved themselves as permanent topics on the forums.
4) Moderation is far too harsh. If I were to attempt to list [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.404382-Lament-For-The-Fallen-Banned?page=1] all the good, energetic posters that have been banned I would be here for a very long time. The moderation is set up in such a way that it's very easy to get banned for a gradual build-up of very minor offenses. In particular I feel that low content should not be a bannable offense. Different offenses should carry different punishments. Low content posts should earn a 2 week suspension at most, or posters that only just barely cross the line in the heat of an argument should only get a temporary ban for a month or two for repeated offences. Permabans should be only be reserved for the most drastic cases.
Additionally there are certain rules that effectively censor discussion. The rule about piracy, which is particularly relevant to gaming, means that only one side of the argument can be represented on the forums.
5) No and no.
6) No, and I have the Facebook comments turned off.
7) Yes, implement a more nuanced system of moderation.
2) I like the focus on actual discussion, rather than the single sentence back and forth that a lot of sites have. I also enjoy the fact that most people attempt proper capitalization and grammar.
I dislike that it's quite common to see dismissal of criticism. I'm not saying actual counter arguments against criticism. Canned phrases like "Don't like it, Don't buy it", "corporations exist to make money", "vote with your wallet", "it's target demographic is kids/women/casuals not you", "your just entitled", etc. that are just used in an attempt to dismiss a person's argument out of hand rather than to actually refute any of the points that have been made.
3) The forums have definitely changed, since I came here. Countless frequent posters have either been banned or just stop posting. With the amount of regulars that have been switched out for new ones it's impossible for the discussion to have not changed. Other than the changes from having a different group of people, there have been several major events that have left permanent marks on the forum. Anita Sarkeesian, and Gamergate in particular have pretty much engraved themselves as permanent topics on the forums.
4) Moderation is far too harsh. If I were to attempt to list [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.404382-Lament-For-The-Fallen-Banned?page=1] all the good, energetic posters that have been banned I would be here for a very long time. The moderation is set up in such a way that it's very easy to get banned for a gradual build-up of very minor offenses. In particular I feel that low content should not be a bannable offense. Different offenses should carry different punishments. Low content posts should earn a 2 week suspension at most, or posters that only just barely cross the line in the heat of an argument should only get a temporary ban for a month or two for repeated offences. Permabans should be only be reserved for the most drastic cases.
Additionally there are certain rules that effectively censor discussion. The rule about piracy, which is particularly relevant to gaming, means that only one side of the argument can be represented on the forums.
5) No and no.
6) No, and I have the Facebook comments turned off.
7) Yes, implement a more nuanced system of moderation.