Vault101 said:
hey guys...
you remember that certain Bioware game..you know...the one that..well
anyway...
its been like a year since it came out, and unfortunatly all my hopes for that game were dashed by...well YOU (yes YOU! shame on you all) now that i think about it..its almost the aniversay of "the great DA2 freakout of '11"
since my fragile emotinal state has since recovered, (yet to be torn to peices agin by that OTHER Bioware game..Im sure youve heard of it)
Im actually curious..there is a dragon age 3 coming out at some point and I dont like to leave thease things unfinished...(I admit I never managed to kill the archdeamon in DA1...still gotta get round to that)
so...I think what Im essentially asking is...should I play it?is it still as bad in retrospect? or is DA3 going to be an eaqual waste of time
putowtin said:
Vault101 said:
hey guys...
so...I think what Im essentially asking is...should I play it?is it still as bad in retrospect? or is DA3 going to be an eaqual waste of time
I'm with you, havn't played it you but kinda want to, even though everyone claims it's the "Plague of the RPG" world!
I'd describe it as Dragon Age Origin if it never left the Alpha stage of development, from a gameplay and graphical point of view.
However, if you go in expecting the worst and you'll wonder what all the fuss was about.
But it really is pretty bad on the whole.
Even if you get it for cheap, it's 20 hours that would be better spent on something else.
They touted the game as more intimate and politically focused, but that was a load of bullshit.
It's about as political as Eragon.
The game makers have their own political opinions and the game is used as a soapbox to preach these opinions in a bias and non-nonsensical way. That's all.
You'll like it if enjoyed Twilight/Eragon/Stormbreaker and other melodramatic schlock.
It doesn't make any sense if you think about it, it's not half as deep as it thinks it is.