Squilookle said:
More like the worst, you mean. At least the original trilogy treated lightsaber fights as merely an extension of the ideological conflict between characters. In the prequels it's turned into a ballet of fanservice wankfest.
Nope, the best part of Star Wars has always been the wars, among the stars. Ditching the plodding slow sci-fi of the 1950's-70's and replacing it with a healthy dose of faster, in your face WW2 style mayhem on a more personal, individual level.
That's why A New Hope is still regarded as way better than any of the prequels, despite having the least lightsaber porn of the lot.
These are personal opinions, and I get them. They are what make you you. So I honor that. I'm merely putting my views against it for a different perspective of the ideas.
To your first point, it makes sense that the first lightsaber fights would have more of an ideological tete a tete than any other fight we've seen. In the Prequels, the Jedi did not know the Sith existed. In the Sequels, The Sith/First Order were thought destroyed and the only Jedi left hasn't picked up his weapon for possibly decades. Then you mix the concept of Sith only fighting with Rage and Jedi taught to fight merely to defend... there isn't much for emotional release there. Especially when you have a group of people specifically taught to suppress their emotions lest they literally become what they are fighting against.
Now, I won't stay the lightsaber battles in the Prequels were that... realistic. Nor will I say they are practical. But I actually get it, spending most of my life in one form of martial arts or another. You attack what's attacking you via the threat presented conjoined with how you've learned to fight.
As an example, as a Tae Kwon Do student (as Most US Martial Artists started at during their youth...), if I saw Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, I would size him up and think that my kicks are not getting through all muscle. My only acceptable targets are his head, his knees, his hips, his feet and his neck.
Yet, the point is moot because as a professional wrestler, he's going to probably try to close the distance and use his overwhelming strength to slam me into the floor. If I have that knowledge, I'm probably not going to throw any kicks to the head as all he'd have to do is parry or sidestep and grab me as I try to rechamber (if my kicks aren't fast enough).
What's all this mean? When you have a weapon that when it merely touches you, it can melt through you with just the ease of natural gravity, you're going to keep the hell away. You're going to always be on your feet. They deflected blaster bolts with ease and did simple strikes to bring down regular foes, but with Sith they have enemies just as fast as they are with weapons just as dangerous. You're going to get the hell out of the way for those things. You might not know who this person is, or why rage emanates from them constantly, but you're going to get he's trying to kill you and you're going to use every tactic in your book to control the distance and pace while looking for an opening.
I get the idea of Fanservice Wank. They did hire martial artist and stunt people who could fight, so of course there's a spectacle aspect to it. But it's a movie. There's a spectacle aspect to everything about it. From the clothes to the lighting. It has to be somewhat flashy, but yeah, with a weapon that can melt you in seconds, I get why people would be hopping about.
Although if I had a lightsaber, I think I would brush up on Rapier work. Wide swings are a bad idea.
This isn't to you Squilookle, but I fail to understand why people will not get why Jedi train themselves to suppress their emotion. Brightburn couldn't have come out at a better time for this point. If you have the power of what is tantamount to a God and you get angry, who can stop you? As we saw with The Force Awakens, The Force is simply a naturally occurring phenomenon in this galaxy. A Force Sensitive can develop their powers on their own. And the... well, expunged lore is rife of how bad that goes most of the time.
Hawki said:
Don't care.
No, sorry, I don't care. If the three trilogies we've had so far deal with Jedi vs. Sith in some form or another, why on God's green Earth would you make your trilogy about Jedi vs. Sith again, other than to have more Jedi and Sith than usual?
Course I know why from a production standpoint, but sheesh.
Same caveat that I expressed with Squilookle. I understand your viewpoint comes from your perspective, so I'm merely asking questions.
This is something that also I have trouble understanding. If J.K. Rowling wrote a book about normal cops who deal with normal crimes that just happened to be in the Harry Potterverse without any bit of magic, people would wonder what's the point. If the next movie in the X-men universe was about the dangers of Fracking without any spandex, it might have real life parallels but then the question would remain why put it in such a universe?
Yes, there are many interesting parts of the Lore like the Night Sisters, Jensaarai, and others that are even Force Sensitive as well. But those are deep dives into a Lore that I'm pretty sure doesn't exist any more.