buddee1 said:
For psycho analysis I did a break down of team fortress 2 characters, for mental disorders I talked about Twisted Metal Black drivers, for an experiment on courage I wrote 3 pages front and back about Abe and Munch and their journey to save the Gabbits.
I can easily discuss the subtext in splatterhouse between man and mask for hours, but ask me to explain citizen cane and I couldn't do it.
.. Really..? You actually came up with psychological profiles for non-existent characters?
Are real people too difficult? Though frankly a part of me is glad you didn't test this kinda nonsense out on people.
I dealt with a guy who claimed to take psychology too. He pulled out the line "I take Psych!" during an argument and started to
analyze me and my reactions. Arguing with some-one like that is a case of the "unstoppable force meeting the immovable object" but still..
Wouldn't it make more sense to try and analyse the creators of the characters?
Did any of your conclusions come to, at all, "these characters were just designed because
What the hell, why not?" Because it could easily have been the more correct analysis.
Does anybody think this is strange?
Taking into account everything you've said and my own thoughts on it.. I really dont know.. I'm not a very intelligent guy, I cant claim to be, I'm not studying Psychology either so I couldn't give you an accurate analysis on that count either
It becomes a paradox, a man who analyses others questioning himself. You should be asking some-one more qualified, if not qualified, some-one more experienced, or wiser.