Funny you should mention Ghostbusters 2:Happyninja42 said:Yeah I'm aware of the toxic spewing that was being hosed around like the slime devices from Ghostbusters 2 about the trailers, just find it sad that people are hoping for something to be shit.
I have trouble caring, TBH. Like, if it's a good movie, cool, but I mean, the Australian goat is right. The movie will be good or it will be bad, and we'll be off on to the next movie. It's not like I ever expected this to be a staple in my library or a true classic, though either could technically happen. I mean, there's the possibility that this is an amazing flick, or hits that weird sweet spot that has me rewatching Eurotrip and Super Troopers, but even that seems unlikely.I'd like every movie to be awesome, because really what good is a bad movie. And not "so bad it's awesome because it's a delightful trainwreck we can have fun riffing", but the "this just sucks, no redeeming qualities" kind of bad....nobody wins with that kind of film.
TBH, if the reviews were really bad I'd probably just not see it. Or even if they hadn't come up with a trailer better than the first, because GOD was that awful.
But I have trouble seeing a "bad" movie as a failure state. Like, the Transformers movies are boring to me. I'm a fan of the Transformers brand, but the success or failure of the next movie doesn't impact me. I expect it to be awful, I expect it to be successful, and if it is, it doesn't bother me. At the same time, I won't shed tears if it fails. I can't think of a single way it really impacts me.
I think this is part of the reason I was able to enjoy the TMNT movie from 2014. I mean, it's not a movie I'd buy, or watch regularly, but I had fun with it. I wasn't crying about my ruined childhood, because the 80s comics are still there. The 80s cartoon is still there. And the Nick cartoon, which is among the best, is still running. Also, Out of the Shadows demonstrates why fanservice can be a bad thing. A lot of that 80s cartoon was lame.
But if it's bad, it really doesn't hurt me. And if it's good, then, um...good. But there's so much anger, so much entitlement, so much "how dare they not think about me specifically, even though if they'd catered to their fanbase in the 80s I wouldn't have had that cartoon!" and it's just....baffling.
I'll still talk crap about The Phantom Menace and Attack of the clones, but it's not like they impact me. It's just possible to be critical without a huge emotional investment. And in fact, the panning of BVSDOJ seems to have shifted the tone of direction of future movies, so that's a good thing, right? There's another movie I'm definitely not going to buy, and I'd probably have forgotten about it except there were so many threads specifically on here about it. It's sort of like Zoe Quinn, in that I didn't know who she was until people started complaining about her, and now she's going to be permanently lodged in my consciousness. And just so anyone reading this is on the same wavelength as me, if you try and derail this into an argument about Quinn, I'm just going to ignore it. That's not the point here.
I doubt it's a counterpoint because there haven't really been negative reviews to react to. I mean, they could be atempting it pre-emptively, but that's additional speculation.Glad to hear it's at least semi decent? Or at least some people are reporting it as such. Though I guess those reviews could potentially be just as biased the other way as the "it sucks 'cause women!" type of reviews. I've yet to see any reviews of it by the people that I normally watch for opinions on these kind of things before I spend my money on them. So we'll see in the coming weeks or whatever.
I'm curious as to what a larger body of critics says anyway. And I'm interested in what the folks I'm subbed to on YouTube will say, because I value most of their opinions more anyway.