Smithnikov said:
runic knight said:
Usually in how some people like to try to do just that to distract from, if not outright in defense of, the elephant in the room.
So where's Dumbo in this case?
The entirety of the channel awesome situation. You know, the topic of the thread itself? The topic being ignored by you to instead ask about why it is not a good thing to post with the sole purpose of attacking the character of one of the messengers. That whole elephant in the thread that the thread was made to discuss?
I would have thought that was very clearly what was meant by my remarks.
------------
Back to that topic though.
So, what is the collected story thus far? I've heard there are now multiple accounts of sexual predation known and covered up, and then you had people like Olson saying they valued their position in an internet flamewar more than actually revealing what they knew about such things, suggesting they both knew of it and knew it was covered up by management, but did nothing to prevent future victims because, hey, don't want gamergate to mock them.
As for fallout of the controversy, Mike Michaud seems to be the greatest problem time and again, including being the management that was aware of and covering up things. From all I saw in the document though, Doug actually just comes as a bit of an inexperienced buffoon who didn't know how to manager and left that to mike while preferring to be more talent himself. He might skate out of this controversy just fine if he throws some fresh dirt on Michaud himself, or pushes a story about being over a barrel by the guy.