So this happened at my high school..
- Thread starter nunqual
- Start date
Recommended Videos
"Two guys say they saw a guy pick up two girls who gave him a blowjob in the back of a car in the parking lot and they have no proof of it."
What did you expect to happen?
Unless you have cameras, this isn't something the principal could have done anything about. Stupid whores, yes, they were. Stupid guy, yes, he was. But nothing can be done about it.
What did you expect to happen?
Unless you have cameras, this isn't something the principal could have done anything about. Stupid whores, yes, they were. Stupid guy, yes, he was. But nothing can be done about it.
ick
and my H.S. that i just graduated from earlier this year got some stupid freshmen from last year and that whole school is kinda getting dumb, there have been like 1 or 2 people killed and several fights and gang-related stuff thats been spewing gun threats and all that great stuff.
glad im outta the dumb place and away from the anuses that make it not-so-cool anymore.
and my H.S. that i just graduated from earlier this year got some stupid freshmen from last year and that whole school is kinda getting dumb, there have been like 1 or 2 people killed and several fights and gang-related stuff thats been spewing gun threats and all that great stuff.
glad im outta the dumb place and away from the anuses that make it not-so-cool anymore.
This guy speaks the truth! And it just seems really creepy in the first place to have a 20-something guy picking up high school freshmen. This raises some questions with me. Are we SURE that the girls consented to this? If they did, why? Was there money involved? (If there was, the girls wouldn't likely admit it, as they would be booked for prostitution.) Why was a 20-something year old guy even picking up underage girls in the first place? Why weren't the parents and authorities notified at all? It's way too fishy to be just let go.vato_loco said:
My school had stories about kids who got trapped in the basement and had to spend the night down there, about how a kid died in a fire in the old section of the school (which was made in the early 1900s with few real exits), how a gargoyle fell off a corner of the building and crushed a principal's car...Teh Ty said:
Sex stories continued too. You're talking about the age group of people who feel the most sexual hormones than any other stage of human existence, in an age where sex is being forced on kids earlier and earlier and kids want to grow up faster and faster.
Not that stories like that didn't exist in some form or another 20, 30 or 40 years ago, but still. Stories about girls who had sex in the bathrooms, on the toilets, for money. About seeing two people shagging in the pool. Hell, we had condom wrappers lying about the dressing rooms.
Our school dressing rooms were pretty useless for anything besides the activity of sex, anyway. They had one entrance, and therefore one exit, and no windows. The doors opened into the room, which meant you could wedge a chair against the door and wall and not worry about anybody getting in, if you did it right. It also had cushioned benches for some reason, and was originally supposed to be next to the gym. They discovered the soil on that side of the school was too soft to build a gym and pool on, so they built it on the other side instead and left the dressing rooms there. The theater was near there, so I suppose they were going to be used for changing costumes during plays, but there were too many doors between the backstage and the dressing room so it made no sense to actually use them. In my years there alone I think there were at least four incidents wherein the hall monitors walked in on people in there.
Good years though. Superficial, sexually-charged years, albeit, but I had a hell of a lot of fun in that school. Never a dull moment. One day we'd have ten kids riding bicycles through the hallway, another day, there'd be marbles on the stair landings. Greased piglet in near the lockers one week and somebody's pet alligator in the pool the next.
OP: This post is too long.
TL;DR: Enjoy school and ignore people like that. Or just laugh at them.
"Sexual behaviours" don't make people pregnant. Sex makes people pregnant (sometimes). Other "sexual behaviours" are often specifically deployed for the sole purpose of satiating sexual urges in such a way that no pregnancy is forthcoming. Saying that these things lead to prengancy is a bit like saying that unloading a gun leads to shooting a gun.vato_loco said:
Crazy shit.
Back in the day we had a few crazy things go down (yup, nostalgia makes me talk like I'm in the nineties), but nothing like that.
One of the teachers was having sex with one of his pupils (all the students knew, so did the teachers, but the headteacher and such didn't. It was quite funny.), a couple of kids got caught with weed on them once.
But the greatest thing of all was our 6th form leavers day/party/drinking marathon, in which people were having sex in the toilets (apparently) and we all got very drunk on the sports field (when we weren't meant to be drinking, they set up bouncy castles and shit for us, for some reason) and had a shitload of fun with the cooler tutors. Apparently the head was not happy.
But back to the story, more should have happened to those girls.
Back in the day we had a few crazy things go down (yup, nostalgia makes me talk like I'm in the nineties), but nothing like that.
One of the teachers was having sex with one of his pupils (all the students knew, so did the teachers, but the headteacher and such didn't. It was quite funny.), a couple of kids got caught with weed on them once.
But the greatest thing of all was our 6th form leavers day/party/drinking marathon, in which people were having sex in the toilets (apparently) and we all got very drunk on the sports field (when we weren't meant to be drinking, they set up bouncy castles and shit for us, for some reason) and had a shitload of fun with the cooler tutors. Apparently the head was not happy.
But back to the story, more should have happened to those girls.
Imagine this, if you will, two adults go to a high school parking lot and starting performing oral sex, in plain sight, of all the kids. Do you think someone should get in trouble with the police?
Now imagine one of them is 14 years old (maybe even 13, it's still early in the school year) performing oral sex on an adult in the parking lot. Now the adult gets off scot-free?
Is anyone seeing any logic in this? This is at minimum indecent exposure to minors or lewd acts in front of minors or whatever.
And guess what, 14 years old is really, really young. That's a kid. Sure, sometimes they look like adults and use four-letter words. But they're children in a very real way and should be protected. Just because you can label it as "attention seeking" doesn't mean people shouldn't be very concerned. Do you ignore the 14 year old girl that comes to class with cut marks on her wrists? If she doesn't get some help now she could screw up her life a lot worse in the long term than it would in thew short term by "going public".
Also, being 20+ means you're an adult. Believe it or not, that comes with responsibilities. One of them is following a very simple law that says you can't have sex with kids. The cops definitely should be called. It seems very possible the OP doesn't know if they've actually been alerted, though. It's not like her name would be in the police report (I'm assuming the parents were).
It's clearly public already anyway (or very soon will be). The OP didn't see the oral sex first-hand (or the "meeting onine" thing). He heard it about it from someone else. These things never stay "covered up" if students know about it.
Are all you people saying that "it's not a big deal" trolling? I don't get it.
Side note - The number of truly covered up student-teacher liaisons is astounding. My father was a member of the school board and the ratio of liaisons that were successfully covered up to those that everyone found out about was at least 5:1. And it's always a student that leaks it.
Now imagine one of them is 14 years old (maybe even 13, it's still early in the school year) performing oral sex on an adult in the parking lot. Now the adult gets off scot-free?
Is anyone seeing any logic in this? This is at minimum indecent exposure to minors or lewd acts in front of minors or whatever.
And guess what, 14 years old is really, really young. That's a kid. Sure, sometimes they look like adults and use four-letter words. But they're children in a very real way and should be protected. Just because you can label it as "attention seeking" doesn't mean people shouldn't be very concerned. Do you ignore the 14 year old girl that comes to class with cut marks on her wrists? If she doesn't get some help now she could screw up her life a lot worse in the long term than it would in thew short term by "going public".
Also, being 20+ means you're an adult. Believe it or not, that comes with responsibilities. One of them is following a very simple law that says you can't have sex with kids. The cops definitely should be called. It seems very possible the OP doesn't know if they've actually been alerted, though. It's not like her name would be in the police report (I'm assuming the parents were).
It's clearly public already anyway (or very soon will be). The OP didn't see the oral sex first-hand (or the "meeting onine" thing). He heard it about it from someone else. These things never stay "covered up" if students know about it.
Are all you people saying that "it's not a big deal" trolling? I don't get it.
Side note - The number of truly covered up student-teacher liaisons is astounding. My father was a member of the school board and the ratio of liaisons that were successfully covered up to those that everyone found out about was at least 5:1. And it's always a student that leaks it.
Yeah! Vile whores, giving in to ungodly sexual urges! Women should be chaste until marriage at the age of 21, anything else is just disgusting! /snarkPeteron said:
You know what's disgusting to me? The psychological trauma many teenagers end up coping with in later life thanks to sanctimonious, puritanical tosswads judging them for engaging in an entirely natural activity of their own accord. Statutory rape laws are an unfortunate necessity thanks to the existence of predatory adults, but adults who treat girls who engage in sexual activity as pariahs are every bit as despicable as adults who manipulate them into having sex.
Take a guess as to wear we picked it up. I'm a high school kid, and I'm not the one in charge of the media.Peteron said:
OP: Rofl. If both parties gave consent, I don't see what the problem is. But they should have been on thier own property
I'd get rid of the 'legal consent to give a blowjob' thing. There isn't one. Oral sex, is very questionable and technically isn't protected by law unless you wish to prosecute. So if they chose not to prosecute, it wasn't illegal.
Anyway, that's not that bad. I'm in england and underage sex isn't that unusual, it's pretty much common. Hell, i did it, most of my friends did. Admittadly there are some who are still virgins, and i'm not giving digs because nobody really cares if youre a virgin or not.
Anyway, they should have alerted the parents and i'm guessing the only reason they didn't was because the girls probably said they gave consent. Which would be their choice, near regardless of age. (As long as sex wasn't involved)
Anyway, that's not that bad. I'm in england and underage sex isn't that unusual, it's pretty much common. Hell, i did it, most of my friends did. Admittadly there are some who are still virgins, and i'm not giving digs because nobody really cares if youre a virgin or not.
Anyway, they should have alerted the parents and i'm guessing the only reason they didn't was because the girls probably said they gave consent. Which would be their choice, near regardless of age. (As long as sex wasn't involved)
